AGENDA

 

Ordinary Council meeting

Monday, 11 December 2023

I hereby give notice that an Ordinary meeting of Council will be held on:

Date:

Monday, 11 December 2023

Time:

8.30am

Location:

Bay of Plenty Regional Council Chambers

Regional House

1 Elizabeth Street

Tauranga

Please note that this meeting will be livestreamed and the recording will be publicly available on Tauranga City Council's website: www.tauranga.govt.nz.

Marty Grenfell

Chief Executive

 


Terms of reference – Council

 

 

Membership

Chairperson

Commission Chair Anne Tolley

Members

Commissioner Shadrach Rolleston

Commissioner Stephen Selwood

Commissioner Bill Wasley

Quorum

Half of the members physically present, where the number of members (including vacancies) is even; and a majority of the members physically present, where the number of members (including vacancies) is odd.

Meeting frequency

As required

Role

·       To ensure the effective and efficient governance of the City.

·       To enable leadership of the City including advocacy and facilitation on behalf of the community.

Scope

·       Oversee the work of all committees and subcommittees.

·       Exercise all non-delegable and non-delegated functions and powers of the Council.

·       The powers Council is legally prohibited from delegating include:

        Power to make a rate.

        Power to make a bylaw.

        Power to borrow money, or purchase or dispose of assets, other than in accordance with the long-term plan.

        Power to adopt a long-term plan, annual plan, or annual report

        Power to appoint a chief executive.

        Power to adopt policies required to be adopted and consulted on under the Local Government Act 2002 in association with the long-term plan or developed for the purpose of the local governance statement.

        All final decisions required to be made by resolution of the territorial authority/Council pursuant to relevant legislation (for example: the approval of the City Plan or City Plan changes as per section 34A Resource Management Act 1991).

·       Council has chosen not to delegate the following:

        Power to compulsorily acquire land under the Public Works Act 1981.

·       Make those decisions which are required by legislation to be made by resolution of the local authority.

·       Authorise all expenditure not delegated to officers, Committees or other subordinate decision-making bodies of Council.

·       Make appointments of members to the CCO Boards of Directors/Trustees and representatives of Council to external organisations.

·       Consider any matters referred from any of the Standing or Special Committees, Joint Committees, Chief Executive or General Managers.

Procedural matters

·       Delegation of Council powers to Council’s committees and other subordinate decision-making bodies.

·       Adoption of Standing Orders.

·       Receipt of Joint Committee minutes.

·       Approval of Special Orders.

·       Employment of Chief Executive.

·       Other Delegations of Council’s powers, duties and responsibilities.

Regulatory matters

Administration, monitoring and enforcement of all regulatory matters that have not otherwise been delegated or that are referred to Council for determination (by a committee, subordinate decision-making body, Chief Executive or relevant General Manager).

 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

Order of Business

1         Opening karakia. 7

2         Apologies. 7

3         Public forum.. 7

4         Acceptance of late items. 7

5         Confidential business to be transferred into the open. 7

6         Change to the order of business. 7

7         Confirmation of minutes. 8

7.1           Minutes of the Extraordinary Council meeting held on 13 November 2023. 8

7.2           Minutes of the Council meeting held on 27 November 2023. 16

8         Declaration of conflicts of interest 59

9         Deputations, presentations, petitions. 59

Nil

10       Recommendations from other committees. 60

10.1         Appointment of Chairperson for Wastewater Management Review Committee. 60

11       Business. 61

11.1         Approval of Private Plan Change 35 (Tauriko Business Estate (Stage 4)) for Notification. 61

11.2         Te Tumu Urban Growth Areas. 66

11.3         Hull Road Intersection increased unbudgeted expenditure. 72

11.4         Cameron Road Stage 2 Detailed Business Case. 76

11.5         Accessible Streets Otumoetai Business Case Approval 84

11.6         Traffic & Parking Bylaw Amendment 48. 96

11.7         Adopt Reviewed Traffic and Parking Bylaw.. 116

11.8         Mount Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park. 147

11.9         Executive Report 209

11.10      Te Manawataki o Te Papa Ltd - Letter of Expectation for 2024-25. 247

11.11      Meetings Schedule 2024. 254

11.12      Overview Report - Memorial Park Recreation Hub Programme. 258

11.13      Memorial Park Recreation Hub - Aquatics Options Report 267

11.14      Approval of Memorial Park Site Development Plan. 323

12       Discussion of late items. 338

13       Public excluded session. 339

13.1         Strategic Property Purchase for Memorial Park Recreation Hub Project 339

13.2         Public Excluded Minutes of the Council meeting held on 27 November 2023. 339

13.3         Indoor Court Provision - Concept Design & Cost Estimate and Exemption to Open Competition. 340

13.4         Memorial Park Aquatic Centre - Procurement Strategy. 340

13.5         Tauranga Art Gallery land purchase and capital project update. 340

13.6         Progression of Procurement for Cameron Road Stage 2. 340

13.7         Transport Major Projects Governance and Oversight Arrangements. 340

13.8         Tauriko West: Strategic Considerations for Tauriko West Enabling Works Procurement 341

13.9         Te Tumu Urban Growth Area. 341

13.10      Sale of Smiths Farm - Selection of Preferred Purchaser/Developer 341

13.11      Exemption from Open Competition - New Inlet Works Mechanical Plant Procurement 341

13.12      Exemption to Open Competition - Prefabricated Public Convenience Block. 341

13.13      Direct Appointment under Exemption - Biofilter Replacement 342

13.14      Waterfront Projects Funding - Request for Budget Adjustments. 342

13.15      Te Manawataki o Te Papa Infrastructure Funding and Financing Levy. 342

14       Closing karakia. 343

 

 


1          Opening karakia

2          Apologies

3          Public forum

4          Acceptance of late items

5          Confidential business to be transferred into the open

6          Change to the order of business


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

7          Confirmation of minutes

7.1         Minutes of the Extraordinary Council meeting held on 13 November 2023

File Number:           A15335185

Author:                    Shaleen Narayan, Team Leader: Governance Services

Authoriser:              Shaleen Narayan, Team Leader: Governance Services

 

Recommendations

That the Minutes of the Extraordinary Council meeting held on 13 November 2023 be confirmed as a true and correct record.

 

 

 

Attachments

1.       Minutes of the Extraordinary Council meeting held on 13 November 2023 

 

 


UNCONFIRMEDExtraordinary Council meeting minutes

13 November 2023

 

 

MINUTES

Extraordinary Council meeting

Monday, 13 November 2023

 


 

Order of Business

Appoinment of Chairperson. 3

1         Opening karaka. 3

2         Apologies. 3

3         Acceptance of late items. 3

4         Confidential business to be transferred into the open. 4

5         Change to the order of business. 4

6         Declaration of conflicts of interest 4

7         Business. 4

7.1           2024-34 Long Term Plan – Adoption of consultation document 4

8         Discussion of late items. 7

9         Closing karakia. 7

 

 


 

 

MINUTES OF Tauranga City Council

Extraordinary Council meeting

HELD AT THE Bay of Plenty Regional Council Chambers, Regional House,

1 Elizabeth Street, Tauranga

ON Monday, 13 November 2023 AT 1pm

 

 

 

PRESENT:                 Commissioner Bill Wasley (Chairperson), Commission Chair Anne Tolley (online/virtual), Commissioner Shadrach Rolleston, Commissioner Stephen Selwood (online/virtual)

 

IN ATTENDANCE:     Marty Grenfell (Chief Executive) (online/virtual), Paul Davidson (Chief Financial Officer) (online/virtual), , Christine Jones (General Manager: Strategy, Growth & Governance) (online/virtual), Kathryn Sharplin (Manager Finance), Tracey Hughes (Financial Insights and Reporting Manager), Josh Logan (Team Leader: Corporate Planning), Coral Hair (Manager: Democracy & Governance Services), Sarah Drummond (Governance Advisor), Shaleen Narayan (Team Leader: Governance Services)

 

EXTERNAL:               Leon Pieterse (Audit New Zealand)

 

 

 

At 1.10pm the meeting adjourned due to technical difficulties with the livestreaming and recording of the meeting.

At 1.25pm the meeting reconvened.

 

 

Appoinment of Chairperson

Resolution  CO21/23/1

Moved:       Commission Chair Anne Tolley

Seconded:  Commissioner Shadrach Rolleston

That the Council:

(a)             Appoints Commissioner Bill Wasley as the Chairperson for this meeting as the Commission Chair was attending the meeting remotely.

Carried

 

1          Opening karaka

Commissioner Shadrach Rolleston opened the meeting with a karakia.

2          Apologies

Nil

3          Acceptance of late items

Nil

 

 

4          Confidential business to be transferred into the open

Nil

5          Change to the order of business

Nil

6          Declaration of conflicts of interest

Nil

7          Business

7.1         2024-34 Long Term Plan – Adoption of consultation document

Staff          Marty Grenfell, Chief Executive

Paul Davidson, Chief Financial Officer

Christine Jones, General Manager: Strategy, Growth & Governance

Josh Logan, Team Leader: Corporate Planning

Kathryn Sharplin, Manager: Finance

Tracey Hughes, Financial Insights and Reporting Manager

 

External    Leon Pieterse, Audit New Zealand

 

 

Key points

·       At the Council meeting on 6 November 2023, the supporting information for the proposed Long Term Plan (LTP) 2024-34 had been adopted, noting any additional or amended. disclosures to be required by Audit New Zealand to be tabled at the 13 November Council meeting. The Chief Executive was authorised to make minor amendments to the documentation to ensure accuracy and correct minor drafting errors.

·       During the final stages of the audit staff had been correcting the LTP documents with some minor changes and including what the Commissioners had asked for at the Council meeting on 6 November 2023.

·       There had been a few changes to the financial statements from 6 November 2023 Council meeting. A new version of the Draft Underlying Financial Statements was set out in Attachment 3 and a revised version was tabled. .Resolution (b) re-adopts the updated Financial Statements with additional changes.

·       Tabled updated pages in the consultation document since the publication of the version on the 13 November agenda.

·       Tabled new resolution (c) (i) which set out all the changes that include the additional or amended disclosures in the consultation document required by Audit New Zealand and as identified by staff review since the version considered by Council on 6 November 2023 and the version of the Consultation Document on the agenda, and Tabled (c) (ii) which set out the tabled changes with additional or amended disclosures in the consultation document as identified by staff between the version on the agenda and the final version tabled.

·       Consultation opens on 15 November 2023 and closes 15 December 2023 at 5pm.

 

In response to questions

·       None

 

 

Resolution  CO21/23/2

Moved:       Commissioner Bill Wasley

Seconded:  Commissioner Shadrach Rolleston

That the Council:

(a)     Receives the report "2024-34 Long Term Plan – Adoption of consultation document".

(b)     Adopts the updated Draft Underlying Financial Statements (Attachment 3) as supporting documentation for the proposed Long-term Plan 2024-34.

(c)     (i)      Approves the following additional or amended disclosures in the consultation document required by Audit New Zealand and as identified by staff review since the version considered by Council on 6 November 2023:

·       Page 2 – reordered list of consultation items

·       Page 3 – significant reduction in water services reform text and direction of the reader to page 84 for more details

·       Page 6 – correction of time and dates of consultation events

·       Page 7 – index updated

·       Page 15 – updated city centre text to confirm covers more than just Te Manawataki o Te Papa

·       Page 17 – include Memorial Pool disclosure previously on page 20

·       Page 18 – additional disclosure required by Audit New Zealand relating to Plan Change 33 and the National Policy Statement on Urban Development

·       Page 20 – additional disclosure required by Audit New Zealand relating to uncertainty on external funding

·       Page 20 – move Memorial Pool disclosure to page 17

·       Pages 28-53 – reordered the list of consultation items to align with the summary document

·       Pages 50-52 – added disclosures on estimated operating costs for the proposed stadium under each option

·       Pages 56-58 – added additional text, and removed duplicate benefit bullet points, relating to the SmartTrip proposal

·       Page 66 – amendments to opening two paragraphs required by Audit New Zealand to clarify message around projects that are not included in the ten years of the Long-term Plan

·       Pages 71-72 – additional disclosure required by Audit New Zealand relating to capital delivery

·       Page 72 – added a new graph showing capital investment

·       Pages 84-85 – additional disclosures required by Audit New Zealand relating to water services reform

·       Pages 89-97 – order of consultation questions changed

·       Te reo headings reintroduced to pages 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 33, 34, 37, 41, 45, 49, 54, 56, 62, 66, 68, 70, and 86

·       Minor changes to improve spelling, grammar, or formatting on pages 1, 2, 6, 11, 16, 18, 20, 22, 25, 26, 27, 45, 46, 47, 49, 50, 51, 52, 58, 59, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76, 79, 80, and 81.

(ii)     Approves the following tabled additional or amended disclosures in the consultation document as identified by staff since the publication of the version on the 13 November agenda:

 

·       Page 73 – updated debt disclosure to $1.6bn to ensure consistent with graph on page 74

·       Page 79 – revised graph to ensure colours consistent with page 73 graph

·       Pages 86-99 – re-ordered to place audit opinion before submission form

·       Page 88 – removed the ‘preferred method of contact’ tick-box for submitters

·       Page 89 – added Omanawa as a residential option

·       Pages 90-99 – re-ordered questions to match the consultation document order and to make minor typographical improvements to match changes made earlier in the document.

Carried

 

Auditor’s Opinion

·       Tauranga City was the first council to have adopted the ”waters out” consultation document.

·       Mr Pieterse tabled his auditor’s opinion and advised that he was comfortable that the consultation document provided an effective basis for public participation and fairly represented the matters proposed for inclusion in the LTP and the information and assumptions underlying the information in the consultation document were reasonable.

·       Three emphasis of matters were drawn to the Council’s attention in the audit opinion, the uncertainty over the water services reforms with the change in government, external funding of capital expenditure and uncertainty over the delivery of the capital programme.

·       Staff were acknowledged by Audit New Zealand for their hard work and effort.

 

In response to questions

None

 

Discussion points raised

·       Staff and Audit New Zealand teams were acknowledged by the Commissioners for the level of commitment and they acknowledged the additional workload created by Tauranga City being the first council to have adopted the ”waters out” consultation document. 

Resolution  CO21/23/3

Moved:       Commission Chair Anne Tolley

Seconded:  Commissioner Stephen Selwood

That the Council:

(d)     Receives the audit opinion on the consultation document for the proposed 2024-34 Long-term Plan, pursuant to s93C (4) of the Local Government Act 2002.

Carried

Resolution  CO21/23/4

Moved:       Commission Chair Anne Tolley

Seconded:  Commissioner Stephen Selwood

That the Council

(e)     Adopts the audited Consultation Document (Attachment 4) for public consultation, using the special consultative procedure pursuant to s93 and s93A of the Local Government Act 2002.

(f)      Authorises the Chief Executive to make any necessary minor drafting or presentation amendments to the consultation document or supporting documentation.

Carried

Attachments

1        CD Adoption Attachment 3

2        Audit New Zealand Report

3        Amended recommended resolutions

4        Draft Underlying Financial Statements

 

8          Discussion of late items

Nil

9          Closing karakia

Commissioner Shadrach Rolleston closed the meeting with a karakia

 

 

The meeting closed at 1.45pm.

 

 

The minutes of this meeting were confirmed at the Ordinary meeting of the Tauranga City Council held on 11 December 2023.

 

 

 

 

...................................................

CHAIRPERSON

 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

7.2         Minutes of the Council meeting held on 27 November 2023

File Number:           A15370324

Author:                    Shaleen Narayan, Team Leader: Governance Services

Authoriser:              Shaleen Narayan, Team Leader: Governance Services

 

Recommendations

That the Minutes of the Council meeting held on 27 November 2023 be confirmed as a true and correct record.

 

 

 

Attachments

1.       Council 2023-11-27 [4551] Minutes.DOCX - A15333539  

 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 






















Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

8          Declaration of conflicts of interest

9          Deputations, presentations, petitions

Nil


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

10        Recommendations from other committees

10.1       Appointment of Chairperson for Wastewater Management Review Committee

File Number:           A15371094

Author:                    Anahera Dinsdale, Governance  Advisor

Authoriser:              Shaleen Narayan, Team Leader: Governance Services

 

Purpose of the Report

1.       The purpose of this report is to bring a recommendation from the Wastewater Management Review Committee to Council for consideration. At its meeting on 22 November 2023, the Committee passed the following resolution which includes a recommendation to Council.

2.       Item 9.1 – Appointment of Chairperson of Wastewater Management Review Committee

Committee Resolution  WW3/23/1

Moved:       Commissioner Bill Wasley

Seconded:  Mr Whitiora McLeod

That the Wastewater Management Review Committee:

(a)     Receives the report "Appointment of Chairperson of Wastewater Management Review Committee".

(b)     Recommends to Council that Spencer Webster (Ngā Potiki) is appointed as the Chairperson of the Wastewater Management Review Committee.

(c)     Thanks Lara Burkhardt for her services as Chairperson of the Wastewater Management Review Committee.

Carried

 

3.       In accordance with the Committee recommendation WW3/23/3 (b) Council are now asked to appoint Mr Spencer Webster as the Chairperson to Wastewater Management Review Committee.

 

Recommendations

That the Council:

(a)     Receives the report "Appointment of Chairperson for Wastewater Management Review Committee".

(b)     Appoint Spencer Webster (Nga Potiki) as the Chairperson of Wastewater Management Review Committee.

 

 

Attachments

Nil

 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

11        Business

11.1       Approval of Private Plan Change 35 (Tauriko Business Estate (Stage 4)) for Notification

File Number:           A15296800

Author:                    Phillip Martelli, Project Leader: Urban Planning

Authoriser:              Christine Jones, General Manager: Strategy, Growth & Governance

 

Purpose of the Report

1.      The purpose of this report is to seek a recommendation from Council to accept, for the purposes of notification, proposed Private Plan Change 35 Tauriko Business Estate (Stage 4), as requested by Element IMF.

 

Recommendations

That the Council:

(a)     Receives the report "Approval of Private Plan Change 35 (Tauriko Business Estate (Stage 4)) for Notification".

(b)     Accepts, in accordance with RMA Schedule 1 cl 25, Private Plan Change 35 Tauriko Business Estate (Stage 4) to the operative Tauranga City Plan for public notification. 

(c)     Authorises the General Manager: Strategy, Growth & Governance to arrange the public notification process in accordance with the provisions of the First Schedule to the Resource Management Act 1991.

(d)     Delegates authority to the General Manager: Strategy, Growth & Governance to approve any minor and technical changes to the Proposed Private Plan Change 35 documentation and Technical Reports as required prior to public notification, and that any such changes to be within the confines of the s92 Request for Further Information.

(e)     Requires adherence to the Council’s policy of full recovery of costs associated Private Plan Change 35.

 

 

Executive Summary

2.       Element IMF are the developers of the Tauriko Business Estate and have prepared a private plan change to allow development of Stage 4 of the Business Estate. The plan change will rezone the land from Rural to Tauriko Industrial, plus related zones.

3.       Private Plan Change 35 Tauriko Business Estate (Stage 4) has been prepared to the point of notification.

4.       The acceptance of Private Plan Change 35 (PPC35) is sought by Council for public notification for submissions under Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.

Background

5.       The existing Tauriko Industry Zone land is close to reaching capacity and the developers of the Business Estate are seeking to extend the Zone. The land in question (along with other land) was transferred from Western Bay of Plenty District to Tauranga City in 2021.

6.       The area subject to the Proposed Plan Change covers some 133ha of which 110ha is proposed to be industrial. Approximately 80% is owned by Element IMF with the remainder being in the ownership of private parties.

7.       Development of the Zone is proposed to be staged, with triggers relating to State Highway 29 upgrades and wastewater capacity.

8.       A section 32 analysis is a detailed assessment required by the RMA to establish whether the proposed Private Plan Change content is the most appropriate course of action. This has been prepared by the proponents of the PPC and is included as Attachment 1.

Strategic / Statutory Context

9.       The National Policy Statement – Urban Development requires Tauranga City Council to ensure that it has sufficient capacity to meet the expected demand for business land. The “Business Capacity Assessment” of Tauranga City and Western Bay of Plenty was completed by M.E Consulting in December 2022. This revealed that the land subject to the Proposed Plan Change is identified as being required to help the City meet its short to medium term target.

STATUTORY CONTEXT / Options Analysis

10.     Private plan changes are provided for in Schedule1 of the Resource Management Act.

11.     The Proposed Plan Change was lodged with Council on 18 October 2023. It was assessed by staff and has been subject to a RMA Section 92 Further Information Request which was sent on 15 November 2023. The s92 initial response from the applicant was received on 17 November 2023 and meetings held over the subsequent week.  There has been no further request for information from staff and the Proposed Plan Change must now be considered by Council as to how it should be processed.

12.     Clause 25 of Schedule 1 requires the Council to consider the request and make a decision on one of the options available. The options are: 

·        Adopt the plan change as if it were its own plan change(25(2)(a)). This means the Council supports the plan change (subject to the hearings process), including providing all the necessary technical support for the hearing. All costs associated with the plan change rest with Council. Although the Proposed Plan Change addresses a strategic planning issue being a projected shortfall in industrial land, it is primarily to benefit a single landowner who is the applicant.

·        Accept the plan change in which case it remains a private plan change (25(2)(b)). Council proceeds to process it and all costs associated with the request (including notification and any hearing) are recoverable from the applicant. Following from the bullet point above, as the applicant is the prime benefit of the plan change, it is appropriate that they cover the costs. This includes all necessary technical support, and Council’s policy is to also recoup all processing costs including staff time. This includes engaging an independent contractor to be the reporting planner as Council will have insufficient resources through this period.

·        Reject the plan change based on limited grounds (25(4)) as follows:

a. The request or part of the request is frivolous or vexatious; or 

b. Within the last two years, the substance of the request or part of the request 

i. has been considered and given effect to, or rejected by, the local authority or the Environment Court; or 

ii. has been given effect to by regulations made under Section 360A; or 

c. The request or part of the request is not in accordance with sound resource management practice; or 

d. The request or part of the request would make the policy statement or plan inconsistent with Part 5; or 

e. In the case of a proposed change to a policy statement or plan, the policy statement or plan has been operative for less than two years.

 

None of the above five rejection options apply.

·        Process the PPC as if it were a resource consent in accordance with Part 6 of the RMA. The PPC is primarily about zoning land along with some specific rule changes to the City Plan. It still relies heavily on the existing rules in the City Plan, and this points to a resource consent being inappropriate as all the relevant rules would need to be included as conditions in the resource consent decision.

13.     Accepting the proposed plan change as a private plan change is the preferred option. It also recognises there are some competing issues with the application and thus ‘accepting’ allows Council to maintain a neutral position. It will be the hearings panel that will make the final recommendations to Council.

14.     The Private Plan Change has been subject of a s92 Request for Further Information request. A response has been received from the applicant and staff are currently assessing whether further or additional information is required (RMA Sch1 cl 23 (3)). There are several matters that are still outstanding that will need to be addressed by the applicant. Approval is sought from Council to delegate to the General Manager Strategy, Growth and Governance to approve any changes as a result of that process. Any changes will be confined to those matters raised in the s92 report.

Financial Considerations

15.     Council policy is to recover costs associated with private plan changes as provided for in the legislation (as discussed in 12 above, bullet point 2.)

16.     The applicant has raised the issue of cost recovery for the processing of the Private Plan Change. Their view is that it is a plan change that should have been undertaken by Council to provide more industrial land for the City, and therefore Council should at least cover its own costs. They have provided the following response:

“The Stage 4 extension to TBE was included in the Smartgrowth Settlement Pattern Review in 2016 with decisions that structure planning and RMA processes be commenced. (see attached SGIC Agenda and Papers from 2016*) Council did not action this and Element IMF commenced these processes in 2021 in the form of a Private Plan Change. The reasons Council had not commenced those processes was explained to be primarily a lack of resource and capacity due to focus being applied to Tauriko West and Te Tumu Growth Areas.

Our costs to date associated with the Private Plan Change are in excess of $800,000 and we expect these will exceed $1,000,000 once the process is complete. The majority of these costs would have fallen to TCC (ratepayers) had Council progressed the Plan Change itself.

We have been told that resourcing is still an issue and even the processing of our plan change is to be performed by external consultants on Councils behalf. We are also told that these processing costs will be passed on to us as the applicant.

This is extraordinarily inequitable given the significant costs in preparing the plan change have been borne by ourselves. We consider the disproportionately smaller processing costs should remain with TCC as its contribution to a process that it was to undertake as directed by Smartgrowth.”

*The wording is as follows: “Agree to structure planning/RMA processes for the extension of the Tauriko Business Estate (lower Belk Road) starting in 2016/17, likely to be required in the next 5-10 years.”

17.     Options for Council are discussed in the table below.


 

 

Option

Advantages

Disadvantages

Cost recovery

Council fully recovers all expenditure associated with the PPC

Additional expense to the applicant

Partial cost recovery: don’t charge for staff time, hearings commissioners. Charge for consultant planner for reporting to the Hearing.

Staff costs can be considered to be a given as their role is to input to such proposals. Staff costs are covered by existing budgets.

The Hearings and commissioners can be considered to be a cost of democracy.

The Consultant planner is necessary to compliment staff resources.

The PPC is diverting staff from other projects that are part of the adopted work programme.

Waiver all costs

Cost saving to the applicant

Consultant planner is not budgeted for.

 

18.     If Council were to undertake the plan change it would still be several years away because circumstances have changed since 2016, including other higher priority plan changes. Hence the decision by the applicant to not wait for Council but go down the private plan change path. As stated in paragraph 6 above, the plan change primarily benefits the applicant who owns 80% of the land involved, and therefore it is considered appropriate that they fund the plan change.

19.     On that basis, there are no financial considerations associated with this report. The cost associated with processing Private Plan Change 35 is recoverable from the applicant. Any related administration costs are within existing LTP budgets.

Legal Implications / Risks

20.     The risks associated with the PPC lie with the applicant. Council’s risk is related to the actual processing which is covered by the RMA and Council’s own Procedure and Process Manual. Council’s risk is considered low.

Consultation / Engagement

21.     Consultation and engagement is required by the RMA. This has been undertaken by the applicant as part of preparing their s32 report as required by Schedule 1 of the Act. The RMA also requires the Proposed Plan Change to be publicly notified for submissions and further submissions. This gives interested parties the opportunity to have additional input into the process.

22.     The RMA Schedule 1 clause 4A requires pre-notification with iwi authorities. This is required to occur between the Council decision on acceptance of the Private Plan Change and notification.

Significance

23.     Under the TCC Significance and Engagement Policy, this decision is of medium significance in terms of the consequences for the City in the provision of additional industrial land.

24.     Proposed Private Plan Change 35 will be publicly notified for submissions and further submissions as required under Schedule 1 of the RMA.

Next Steps

25.     Pre-notification is to occur with iwi.

26.     The final proposed Private Plan Change and the accompanying section 32 analysis will be publicly notified in accordance with the requirements of Schedule 1 of the RMA.

27.     Following the submission and further submission process, the Proposed Plan Change will proceed to a hearing and associated decision process.

28.     During the submissions and further submissions process, approval will be sought from Council for the appointment of a Hearings Panel or an Independent Hearings Commissioner(s) to hear and make recommendations on the Plan Change to Council.  This will include whether there is elected member involvement as part of a Hearings Panel.

29.     The decision to adopt the Hearing’s recommendations will rest with Council following the hearing of submissions and receipt of the Hearing Panel or Independent Hearings Commissioner(s) recommendation report.

 

Attachments

1.       S32 Report Private Plan Change 35 - A15362593 (Separate Attachments 2)  

2.       S92 Request for Further Information Table - A15371105 (Separate Attachments 2)  

3.       Full Application and all Technical Documents - A15370856 (Separate Attachments 2)   

 

 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

11.2       Te Tumu Urban Growth Areas

File Number:           A15360557

Author:                    Andy Mead, Manager: City Planning & Growth

Brad Bellamy, Project Leader: Urban Planning

Authoriser:              Christine Jones, General Manager: Strategy, Growth & Governance

 

Purpose of the Report

1.      To reconfirm Te Tumu as a priority urban growth area including Council’s commitment to progressing a Plan Change to enable urban development, and to update progress on the project.

 

Recommendations

That the Council:

(a)     Receives the report "Te Tumu Urban Growth Areas" and notes the update on key matters.

(b)     Reconfirms Te Tumu as a priority urban growth area.

(c)     Reconfirms prioritising work on the Te Tumu structure planning and rezoning project to prepare for notification of a Plan Change to rezone Te Tumu concurrent with process with Tumu Kaituna 14.

(d)     Notes that regular updates will be reported to Council through 2024 as various workstreams, including infrastructure corridor and Kaituna Overflow workstreams are further advanced.

 

 

Executive Summary

2.       Te Tumu is a long-standing component of Tauranga and the Western Bay subregion’s urban development strategy and remains a priority to unlock for urban development.

3.       This report provides a further update of key workstreams associated with the Te Tumu urban growth area plan change. 

4.       Efforts to plan and rezone Te Tumu for urban development began in 2017 with an initial goal of housing development by 2021. However, challenges such as divergent aspirations among Māori landowners, differing opinions from iwi, and changes in national policy, especially freshwater management, have led to delays. The planning process remains lengthy and uncertain, with notification of a plan change possibly not be able to occur until 2026, subject to further assessment of any options to accelerate this.  Nonetheless staff are actively progressing the project to prepare for notification concurrent with TK14 workstreams.

5.       The new government has signalled changes to the RMA and associated national direction that may alleviate some of the challenges and risks associated with the project.

Background

6.       The last report that is relevant to these matters was considered by Council on 11 September 2023. Pursuant to that report, Council noted the range of strategic issues relevant to progressing construction of infrastructure.  To manage these risks Council resolved to consult on a targeted rate through the draft 2024-34 LTP.  The proposed targeted rate is based on:

·    50% of the Te Tumu portion of the transport projects which have most of their expenditure in the first 3 years of the Long-Term Plan.

·    A flat charge per ratepayer across the city with a higher charge (double) in the wider benefit area in Papamoa East and (triple) for those in the full benefit area in Papamoa East.

·    A 20-year repayment period starting in Year 1 of the 2024-34 Long Term Plan period. 

7.       Given the overall fiscal challenges that Council is facing, the draft 2024 – 2034 LTP provides for the following with respect of Te Tumu:

·    Continuation of land use planning and rezoning.

·    Infrastructure planning (including design).

·    Securing land required for infrastructure or public amenity purposes; and

·    The Kaituna Overflow, which is critical to development commencing, not being completed until after the 2024-34 LTP period[1].

8.       The implication of this is that housing supply is unlikely to be delivered in Te Tumu until around 2040 once land development and civil works timeframes are considered.

9.       A number of submissions are expected on the draft LTP in relation to Te Tumu timing and the proposed targeted rate, and these matters will be further considered through the deliberations process in early 2024. 

PLANNING AND ZONING MATTERS

10.     Te Tumu is a long-standing component of Tauranga and the Western Bay subregion’s urban development strategy and remains a priority to unlock for urban development.

11.     The planning and rezoning efforts for Te Tumu have been in progress since 2017, initially with the goal of initiating housing development by 2021. However, the project has encountered various challenges and delays, notably:

(a)     Legal proceedings taken by some Māori landowners against TK14 Trust, impacting on the ability to progress discussions on securing land rights to enable infrastructure delivery through Māori land.

(b)     Māori Trustees needing to undertake an engagement process with beneficial owners to seek a mandate to progress conversations with Council on land access.

(c)     Differing opinions from iwi and hapu regarding the suitability of urban development within Te Tumu.

12.     The changes in national direction under the Resource Management Act (RMA), particularly concerning freshwater management, including wetlands, have further impeded progress.

13.     While there has been some advancement, ongoing challenges persist, particularly as we seek to implement national directives that impact existing technical work and crucial elements of the project. In May this year, Council sought to recommence engagement with iwi and hapu on this project.  This followed a substantial pause in engagement requested by iwi and hapu to allow time for issues between the Tumu Kaituna 14 Trust (TK14) and its landowners to be resolved. Discussions held with iwi and hapu to date have revealed some strong opposition to progressing urban development in Te Tumu, despite TK14 having secured a majority mandate for infrastructure negotiations to commence with TCC.

14.     Despite recent adjustments to the government's freshwater policy, not all of our suggested changes were adopted. Staff are carefully considering these outcomes, especially concerning the Kaituna Stormwater Overflow, which is essential for managing stormwater runoff in Te Tumu and protecting existing development in the wider Wairakei Stream catchment.

15.     Additionally, judicial review proceedings against the Minister for the Environment, seeking a return to more stringent freshwater protection as per the NPS-FM, pose potential impacts on Te Tumu's urban growth area planning.

16.     The recent enactment of the National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity, coupled with the new freshwater policy, adds complexity to key projects associated with urban development in Te Tumu. Compliance with the stringent requirements of the new policy, especially in ecological and wetland areas, present significant challenges.

17.     Considering these challenges, the planning process for rezoning Te Tumu for urban development remains lengthy, intricate, and uncertain with notification of a plan change currently assessed as possibly not able to occur until 2026, subject to further investigations of options to accelerate this.  In addition, the level of staff and consultant resourcing for the project will be increased. 

18.     A Plan Change of this scale could be expected to take two years from notification before decisions (to 2028) and may be subject to appeals which would extend timeframes further. Staff have prepared a draft timeline of the various workstreams associated with the project and will continue to refine this as further work is done. This timeline reflects the complexities and uncertainty around updates required to many of these workstreams given current national policy direction.    

19.     The new government has signalled changes to the RMA and associated national direction which may alleviate some of the challenges and risks associated with this project.  The exact nature and timing of these changes remains uncertain.

20.     There remains a risk that urban development may not proceed in Te Tumu, potentially necessitating ratepayer funding for capex costs related to this area. Continued monitoring and mitigation strategies are crucial to navigate these challenges effectively.

STRATEGIC / STATUTORY CONTEXT

21.     Te Tumu is a core component of SmartGrowth’s strategic growth strategy as agreed through the SmartGrowth Urban Form and Transport Initiative.

22.     The SmartGrowth Strategy, including the Future Development Strategy requirements of the NPS-UD are currently under review and development.  The TCC position on the timing of development in Te Tumu as per this report will flow into that process which, in summary, is that development in Te Tumu is likely to take quite some time to commence but with Council and landowner aspirations for infrastructure funding challenges to be overcome so development can commence earlier than currently anticipated by the draft LTP.

Financial Considerations

Broader Te Tumu financial consideration

23.     Over $600m of Council infrastructure investment is required to enable development of Te Tumu, of which over $300m is allocated to Te Tumu funding with the rest coming from other funding sources eg other growth areas, rates etc.  These costs largely need to be incurred before development in Te Tumu commences and the compounding impacts of interest mean that Te Tumu’s $300m+ share is projected to become around $750m if development is delayed until 2040. 

24.     These matters were addressed in the previous September Council report, and they resulted in a proposed targeted rate to fund 50% of Te Tumu related transport costs being included in the draft LTP.  These matters will be further addressed through LTP submissions, hearings, and deliberations.

25.     A large amount of expenditure is in three waters infrastructure.  These matters were left to lie on the table given uncertainty with waters reform and the statutory ability at this time for TCC to only include waters expenditure and revenues in its upcoming LTP for Years 1 and 2.

26.     There may be some ability to rescope trunk water and wastewater projects, so they are delivered in stages, with Te Tumu capacity coming at a later point.  This continues to be investigated.

27.     Financial considerations will continue to be monitored and reported back to Council as required.  This will include an overall update of the financial feasibility of the development area to take account of significant cost escalation in recent years that will affect key development costs such as internal and external infrastructure and earthworks. 

Legal Implications / Risks

28.     There are a range of risks associated with the Te Tumu project as set out in this report.  Staff are taking legal advice on these matters as appropriate.

Consultation / Engagement

29.     Further engagement has occurred with the Te Tumu landowner group ahead of this report being drafted and engagement will continue moving forward.

30.     TCC continues to inform its SmartGrowth Partners on progress with the Te Tumu urban growth area including impacts on work such as the Housing & Business Assessment, the SmartGrowth Strategy Review & the Future Development Strategy.

Significance

31.     The Local Government Act 2002 requires an assessment of the significance of matters, issues, proposals and decisions in this report against Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.  Council acknowledges that in some instances a matter, issue, proposal or decision may have a high degree of importance to individuals, groups, or agencies affected by the report.

32.     In making this assessment, consideration has been given to the likely impact, and likely consequences for:

(a)   the current and future social, economic, environmental, or cultural well-being of the district or region

(b)   any persons who are likely to be particularly affected by, or interested in, the matter.

(c)   the capacity of the local authority to perform its role, and the financial and other costs of doing so.

33.     This report provides an update on the Te Tumu urban growth area project.  In accordance with the considerations above, criteria and thresholds in the policy, it is considered that the decision is of medium significance.

ENGAGEMENT

34.     Taking into consideration the above assessment, that the matter is of medium significance, officers are of the opinion that no further engagement is required prior to Council making a decision.

Next Steps

35.     The next steps involve progressing key workstreams related to the Te Tumu plan change and reporting progress through 2024.

Attachments

1.       Te Tumu Plan Change Timeline - A15371180  

 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 



Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

11.3       Hull Road Intersection increased unbudgeted expenditure.

File Number:           A15356949

Author:                    Rebecca Rimmer, Senior Project Manager

Jenny Hill, Senior Project Manager

Authoriser:              Nic Johansson, General Manager: Infrastructure

 

Purpose of the Report

1.      The purpose of this report is to approve an updated project budget of $765,250 for the Hull Road level crossing upgrade.

 

 

Recommendations

That the Council:

(a)     Receives the report "Hull Road Intersection increased unbudgeted expenditure."

(b)     Approves an updated project budget for the construction of $765,250 (the current budget is $400,000).

 

Executive Summary

2.       On the 21st July 2023, the Chief Executive approved a request for an unbudgeted expenditure of $400,000 to design and implement safety upgrades to the Hull Road level crossing to enable the safe opening of the adjacent Destination Skate Park in Autumn 2024.

3.       The $400,000 requested was based on estimated costs. Now that the design has progressed and provisional costings have been received for both the design and construction works; the total required at completion is expected to be $765,250, including contingency. This is an additional $365,250 on the previously approved unbudgeted expenditure of $400,000.

4.       It is proposed that the additional $365,250 required to complete the project is approved from the Transportation budget.

 

Background

5.       Construction has commenced on the Destination Skate Park at 1 Hull Road and is expected to be completed by May 2024.

6.       The original $400,000 request was a rough order of cost as the extent of works were unknown. As the design has progressed we are now in a position where the physical works estimates are more detailed. There have also been additional design costs for track improvements which are required to complete the project.  We are still waiting for costings for the physical track works and have therefore put a 15% contingency in place to cover this work.

7.       It is expected that the works will most likely be able to be completed in line with a May 2024 opening of the Skate Park. Due to various design and approval iterations required and the need for the works to be completed by specialist contractors and line closures to be in place it is expected that the implementation of the interim measures will likely form or be very close to forming the critical path for the opening of the Skate Park.

8.       Immediately adjacent to the skate park on Hull Road is an existing level crossing.  A Level Crossing Safety Impact Assessment (LCSIA) was commissioned and completed by Aurecon which highlighted a series of improvements that should be made to the crossing to improve its safety.

9.       In conjunction with KiwiRail a series of interim measures have been identified that would allow the Skate Park to be opened safely (see detailed design below). These include a wider shared path, maze gates, fencing, tactile paving signage and track improvements.  These will need to be followed by the signalisation of the pedestrian/cycle gates.

10.     It is currently proposed to design the full scope of upgrade works as noted in the LCSIA and implement only those that are required to allow the safe opening of the Skate Park.

11.     Based on initial estimates it was expected that the design effort and interim measures would cost in the order of $400,000.

12.     To date $150,000 has been spent on these works.

13.     As the design has developed in conjunction with KiwiRail, it has highlighted the need for track improvements and initial costings have now been refined in line with the detailed design which has shown the expected cost to complete the project will be in the region of $765,250.

14.     The costs associated with track works are to enable safe access to the skate park across the crossing.  This is a TCC cost due to current available KiwiRail funding.  While KiwiRail would ordinarily pay for this, at this time, KiwiRail have advised that this needs to be at TCC cost due to the current schedule for delivery of this project.   The Skatepark and Mount programme requires this work to be completed for the opening of the Skate Park, currently forecast for Spring 2024. The project team are continuing to negotiate these costs with KiwiRail. 

A breakdown of the $685,000 (excludes 15% contingency) is as follows:

Design $141,000

KiwiRail (track work) $246,000

Safety audit $10,000

Construction $260,000

Internal costs $28,000

Total: $685,000

 

Strategic / Statutory Context

15.     The destination skatepark project is a key initiative that will enable us to meet our community outcomes of a city that is, “well-planned with a variety of successful and thriving compact centres, resilient infrastructure, and community amenities” and one that, “values our natural environment and outdoor lifestyle, and actively works to protect and enhance it.

16.     Due to the nature of the Destination Skate Park it is expected that there will be significant trip generation into the area, this is highly likely to increase pedestrian movements across the Hull Road Level Crossing with the current state of this crossing providing minimal safety controls for pedestrians. Encouraging this increased pedestrian movement without increasing safety controls would present a significant risk to user safety.

 

Options Analysis

17.     The LCSIA report has clearly identified the improvements required to the level crossing to make it safer for the public. These measures are being implemented in a staged approach.

 

Financial Considerations

18.     It is expected that the interim measures will cost approximately $685,000 to design and implement. Of this approximately $150,000 has been spent to date. Although cost forecasts have been reviewed, given the remaining uncertainty relating to the Kiwirail costs it is believed to be prudent to allow a contingency of 15% on the remaining costs. Contingency value = ($685,000 - $150,000) x 15% = $80,250

19.     Therefore the total required at completion is expected to be $765,250. This is an additional $365,250 on the previously approved unbudgeted expenditure of $400,000.

20.     Consideration of costs associated with the remaining improvements noted in the LCSIA would be additional to this and funding is yet to be confirmed. These costs are not included in this request.

Legal Implications / Risks

21.     A Funding Agreement is required to be put in place between KiwiRail and TCC to cover the track upgrade work as KiwiRail undertake this work. TCC’s Legal team is working with KiwiRail’s Legal team to agree the final format of this document.

Consultation / Engagement

22.     No formal public consultation has been undertaken to date. Once the design is finalised it will be circulated to interested parties including being displayed at the Mount Hub.

 

Significance

23.     The Local Government Act 2002 requires an assessment of the significance of matters, issues, proposals and decisions in this report against Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.  Council acknowledges that in some instances a matter, issue, proposal or decision may have a high degree of importance to individuals, groups, or agencies affected by the report.

24.     In making this assessment, consideration has been given to the likely impact, and likely consequences for:

(a)   the current and future social, economic, environmental, or cultural well-being of the district or region

(b)   any persons who are likely to be particularly affected by, or interested in, the decision.

(c)   the capacity of the local authority to perform its role, and the financial and other costs of doing so.

25.     In accordance with the considerations above, criteria and thresholds in the policy, it is considered that the decision is of low significance.

ENGAGEMENT

26.     Taking into consideration the above assessment, that the decision is of low significance, officers are of the opinion that no further engagement is required prior to Council making a decision.

Next Steps

27.     Once the updated project budget has been confirmed, the project team will continue preparation for construction of the level crossing upgrade commencing in March/April 2024.

 

Attachments

Nil

 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

11.4       Cameron Road Stage 2 Detailed Business Case

File Number:           A15275818

Author:                    Richard O Kane, Senior Project Manager

Authoriser:              Nic Johansson, General Manager: Infrastructure

 

Purpose of the Report

1.      To provide an overview of the Cameron Road Stage 2 Detailed Business Case and to seek Council endorsement for its submission to Waka Kotahi for their approval.

 

Recommendations

That the Council:

(a)     Receives the report "Cameron Road Stage 2 Detailed Business Case".

(b)     Endorses the Detailed Business Case for submission to Waka Kotahi Board for approval.

 

 

Executive Summary

2.     The purpose of the Cameron Road Stage 2 Detailed Business Case (CRS2 DBC) is to outline the need for investment in a long-term transport solution, within the Te Papa Peninsula of Tauranga. The study area for the CRS2 DBC is along Cameron Road between 17th Avenue and Cheyne Road.

3.       Tauranga and Cameron Road are on the cusp of significant changes in land use. The long-term ambition is to accommodate future growth, manage congestion and enable the urban transformation of the Te Papa Peninsula through providing:

(a)     Greater housing choices;

(b)     Safe and efficient transport options;

(c)     Local amenities; and

(d)     The infrastructure needed to support healthy and connected communities now and in the future.

4.       In response, the SmartGrowth endorsed Urban Form + Transport Initiative (UFTI) Connected Centres Programme was developed in 2020. The UFTI Connected Centres Programme is based on intensifying existing and enabling new growth areas, and having a transport system that supports safe, frequent, and reliable multimodal access for people and goods. The improvements investigated in this business case are a critical step in achieving the UFTI Connected Centres Programme.

5.       CRS2 is included and aligns with the Western Bay of Plenty Transport Spatial Plan (TSP) endorsed by the region by promoting alternative travel modes, increasing bus usage, and reducing car congestion, supporting the plan's goals and enhancing freight reliability. Integrated with increased housing density, the project offers diverse transportation and living options, providing residents with improved access to amenities, employment and links into vital public spaces with the aim to foster vibrant and connected communities.

6.       This DBC is a result of collaborative efforts between Tauranga City Council, tangata whenua, Bay of Plenty Regional Council, Waka Kotahi New Zealand Transport Agency (Waka Kotahi), and stakeholders.

7.       This Business Case identifies a preferred way forward for investment with project partners and stakeholders. This includes the provision of peak hour bus lanes, a two-way cycleway and places that recognise the cultural significance of parts of the corridor.

8.       The investment is proposed to be implemented from 2024 to 2027/28 and financed from a range of funding sources including Crown Funding, the National Land Transport Fund and local share from rates and developer contributions. The total project is estimated to be $164M (P50 rounded) in investment, with a discounted construction cost estimate of $143M, yielding an expected benefit of $103M (Net Present Value), and overall BCR of 0.81 or 1.05 with wider economic benefits included.

Background

9.       The Te Papa Peninsula and Cameron Road corridor constitute a vital hub for residential, employment, and amenity growth in Tauranga, serving as a primary arterial connection from the southern suburbs to the city centre. This area, home to schools, businesses, public spaces, and the hospital, is undergoing a transformative process outlined in strategic documents such as the Te Papa Spatial Plan, UFTI, Plan Change 33, and the Tauranga Moana Cultural Framework.

10.     The Business Case started in 2022 and aims to build upon Stage One, scheduled for completion in early 2024.

11.     Cameron Road is identified as a strategic public transport corridor and plays a key role in promoting increased use of public transport and active modes within Te Papa, aligning with broader urban growth plans. The significance of Cameron Road is further underscored by its inclusion in the Public Transport Reference Case, connecting the CBD, Greerton, and the Tauriko area, and its endorsement in the Tauriko Network Connections DBC, emphasizing the need for upgrades to support high-quality public transport services and accommodate urban growth in the Western Corridor.

12.     A Lessons Learnt study has been commissioned for the Stage One project, with findings being available in advance of the next (detailed design) phase of the project. The ‘Lessons Learnt’ will be considered as part of the detailed design process with construction lessons learnt incorporated within the implementation phase of CRS2.

13.     A significant period of public consultation on the Concept Design has been completed up to 12th November ‘23, with valuable feedback now being assessed in advance of the next, ‘detailed design’ stage of the project, which subject to approval of the Detailed Business Case, will commence in January 2024.

14.     A staged approach to detailed design that integrates the associated Three Waters components, along with the subsequent staged implementation process has been identified as part of the concept design phase, thus avoiding the simultaneous construction across the entire route as the city experienced during Stage 1 of the project.

Strategic / Statutory Context

15.     The Business Case aligns with the Urban Form and Transport Initiative (UFTI) and Te Papa Spatial Plan, focusing on pedestrian and cyclist safety, bus priority measures, and key land transport priorities, including climate change mitigation and safety. It supports the Vision Zero principle and aims to reduce private vehicle trips in line with the Climate Change Commission's advice.

16.     Additionally, the project aligns with the Western Bay of Plenty Transport Spatial Plan (TSP) by promoting alternative travel modes, increasing public transport usage, and reducing car congestion, supporting the plan's goals and enhancing freight reliability. Integrated with increased housing density, the project offers diverse transportation and living options, providing residents with improved access to amenities and employment.

 

Options Analysis

17.     An Investment Logic Mapping (ILM) workshop was held in May 2022 with various stakeholders with the purpose of understanding issues faced by users of Cameron Road and to justify the need for improvements.The ILM workshop identified the benefits and an Opportunity Statement centred on strengthening cultural identity, restoring the mauri of land and water and ultimately managing and realising the anticipated benefits.

18.     The long list options analysis considered various methods to address the transport problem, providing confidence to decision makers that suitable solutions were being explored.

19.     Four options were identified for progression: Do Minimum, and three Hybrid options with different focuses (Safety and Active Modes, Public Transport, and People and Place) all incorporating environmental enhancements.

20.     Following assessments and stakeholder consultation, none of the shortlisted options were deemed fully satisfactory on their own. Therefore, a hybrid option is proposed, combining high-value features of the shortlisted options to optimise project benefits while minimising potential drawbacks.

21.     The emerging Preferred Option for the corridor development proposes integrating the history and cultural identity of Cameron Road and the peninsula into the design, emphasising placemaking opportunities, including a two-way cycleway, 3.5m wide peak-hour bus lanes, and a minimum 2.5m wide footpath on both sides. The plan features signalised mid-block crossings, one lane for general traffic in each direction, measures for speed reductions, and strategically positioned bus stops, along with the use of raingardens for water quality treatment in appropriate areas, all subject to further detailed design considerations.

22.     The Business Case also covers a range of other areas which includes:

(a)     The Strategic Case which outlines the options assessed, the outcomes and objectives of the project. The primary outcome is to:

(i)      Offer a safe, culturally integrated, and vibrant environment that aligns with the Te Papa Spatial Plan's vision for the next 30 years. The investment objectives include improving safety for all users, supporting spatial plan goals through infrastructure development, reducing reliance on private vehicles, and acknowledging the historical significance of the area.

(b)     The Management Case which outlines the strategic approach to the next phases of the project, leveraging past successes and lessons learned from Stage 1 to enhance future stages. The focus is on effective governance, milestone planning, stakeholder engagement, risk management, and ultimately realising the anticipated benefits.

(c)     The Commercial Case which outlines a phased implementation strategy, with construction services procurement planned for 2024, incorporating a flexible approach that includes negotiating the inclusion of the Detailed Design phase based on performance, while noting the absence of significant consenting risks during the Design-Build-Construct phase of the multi-modal improvements on Cameron Road.

(d)     The Financial Case for the Preferred Option underscores a diverse funding approach, with contributions from Crown Funding, the National Land Transport Fund, and local sources. It assures the project's affordability, emphasises ongoing alignment with broader investments, and highlights the need for cost refinement during the detailed design phase to ensure effective implementation.

(e)     The Economic Case for the project is considered economically feasible with a BCR of 0.81 (without wider economic benefits) and 1.05 with wider economic benefits. The key benefits associated with Business Case are:

(i)      Integrate sustainable urban planning and promote remote work to reduce emissions growth.

(ii)      Facilitate public-private partnerships and involve local communities to enable the development of Stage 3.

(iii)     Establish innovation hubs and mixed-use zoning to grow access to goods and services.

(iv)     Support business diversification and develop an emergency preparedness plan to increase business resilience.

Financial Considerations

23.     The forecasted delivery costs for the project are expected to cost between $164M (P50) to $198M (P95).

24.     The proposed cost sharing arrangement between Tauranga City Council, the Crown and Waka Kotahi is tabulated below:

25.     The cost and cashflow for the implementation phase will be assessed through the detailed design phase and the total project cost is considered to be affordable and within existing budget forecasts. Ongoing alignment with broader transport and Three Waters investments will be required to maximise the expected benefits, reduce disruption and to provide cost efficiencies through the pre-implementation phase.

26.     The project has been accounted for in the draft LTP which is due to be adopted next year. We have budgeted for the full cost of the project as part of the draft LTP which is based on current cost estimates.

Legal Implications / Risks

27.     Funding availability within the National Land Transport Plan is a key uncertainty. This will be confirmed through the Waka Kotahi decision-making process and assessed alongside other projects nationally for funding assistance. To mitigate this uncertainty the focus has been on supporting the development of a strong investment case which tells a compelling story for investment and the benefits that would flow from this.

28.     Increasing costs over time (pre-implementation and implementation phase) have been raised as occurring across most transport projects in New Zealand. Contingencies have been added to the physical woks, ongoing maintenance and operational costs.

29.     Funding of parallel projects in the vicinity or within Cameron Road including bus priority measures proposed by BoPRC, the proposed grade separation of the SH29a intersection as noted in the Tauriko Connections business case and water upgrades along, across and adjacent to the corridor has noted financial risks. Mitigations include ongoing coordination through the pre-implementation/detailed design to align with parallel investments, reduce disruption and maximise the expected benefits.

30.     There are a range of project-level delivery risks for TCC to manage including maintaining the relationship with BoPRC, potential financial challenges without Waka Kotahi funding, political support changes due to the recent general election, uncertainties in ground conditions, economic appraisal concerns, and the need to maximise Stage 1 benefits. Mitigation strategies involve transparent communication, early engagement with funders, demonstrating a strong case for investment, detailed site investigations, careful economic appraisal, and incorporating lessons learned from Stage 1 into subsequent phases. The risk management approach adheres to Tauranga City Council guidelines, with the TCC Project Manager responsible for maintaining a risk register and reporting significant changes to the Project Control Group.

31.     The project also relies upon Waka Kotahi investing in the Tauriko Network Connections DBC, in particular Barkes Corner. Whilst that business case is endorsed, funding is yet to be confirmed.

Consultation / Engagement

32.     There has been considerable consultation and engagement over the 1.5-year development of the Business case. GHD has led this consultation and engagement and in a number of situations this has been supported by and with involvement of TCC staff.

33.     Engagement involves a comprehensive and multi-layered approach, including interactive workshops, public exercises, and targeted engagement with various groups, employing a robust and rigorous process that takes stakeholders and the community through a phased journey, with messaging cantered on the importance of infrastructure investment to support future land use, and providing technical overviews to foster a strong sense of ownership and understanding of decision rationale.

The development of this project prioritised community engagement, following a four-stage process, guided by principles such as putting the community first, maintaining consistent and transparent communication, using clear language, and emphasizing the broader strategic benefits for the people of Tauranga.

34.     Engagement with Mana Whenua was a key objective of the business case and focused on establishing robust partnerships with mana whenua, including recognising cultural relationships, engaging with local Māori communities, incorporating Māori aspirations through co-design, participating in consultations, facilitating learning sessions, developing cultural narratives, ensuring transparency, and carefully managing project risks in alignment with Māori values and the Treaty of Waitangi. Additionally, the use of Tauranga Moana Design Principles is highlighted to inform the assessment of interventions for the project. These principles aim to guide culturally appropriate design processes and responses that enhance appreciation of the natural, landscape, and built environment in the Tauranga Moana area.

35.     Initial Discovery Phase community and stakeholder engagement took place between May- July 2022 with the objective to understand the community’s sense of place and determine how it can be incorporated into the Business Case. Overall, 225 respondents engaged with TCC, a Vision Workshop was held on the 25 May 2022, over 90 business were visited along the corridor and three walking tours with Schools were held.

Key themes that emerged from the consultation included:

(a)     The importance of connections across the corridor;

(b)     Recognition of the significant cultural heritage;

(c)     Future-proofing the corridor for anticipated growth;

(d)     Improving safety and amenity within the corridor;

(e)     Streetscape contributing to a sense of place along the corridor;

(f)      Supporting local businesses;

Feedback and technical study findings were taken into consideration to develop a long-list of options for the corridor.

36.     Long-list workshops to seek feedback on the eight options were undertaken between August – September 2022 attended by key project partners, hapu, business and community organisations with the aim to provide updates on key findings to date, present and compare options against investment objectives and identify key features and trade-offs. Discussion around the criteria for the Multi-Criteria Assessment (MCA) was agreed with participants providing preliminary scores for each option. The MCA criteria were Safety, Place, Access and Growth.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

37.     Following the long list MCA assessment and stakeholder consultation, four short-list options were identified for progression for the corridor:

(a)     Do Minimum (included as a comparator)

(b)     Hybrid – Safety and Active Modes focus with Street Greening (environmental enhancements)

(c)     Hybrid – Public Transport focus with Street Greening (environmental enhancements)

(d)     Hybrid – People and Place focus with Street Greening (environmental enhancements)

38.     Short-list community and stakeholder engagement took place between February – April 2023 and was used to develop the preferred option. Over 400 respondents took part during this time and activities included business drop-in sessions, open day stalls at the Tauranga Farmers Market and Summer Market, three community drop-in sessions, a virtual engagement room and online survey which saw 228 responses.

39.     Key themes that emerged from the short-list engagement were:

(a)    


(a)     Traffic flow

(b)     Parking availability

(c)     The natural environment

(d)     Cultural expression

(e)     Attractive and vibrant spaces

(f)      Public transport services

(g)     Active transport

(h)     Safety and security

(i)      Economic impacts

(j)      Supports infrastructure.


Taking all feedback into consideration a hybrid option was proposed, agreed and developed which combines various high value features of the shortlisted options. This approach aims to optimise the benefits of the project while minimising any potential drawbacks.

40.     Community engagement was undertaken on the preferred option in November 2023 but this feedback has not been incorporated in the Business Case and will be used for the Detailed Design phase of the project.

Significance

41.     The Local Government Act 2002 requires an assessment of the significance of matters, issues, proposals and decisions in this report against Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.  Council acknowledges that in some instances a matter, issue, proposal or decision may have a high degree of importance to individuals, groups, or agencies affected by the report.

42.     In making this assessment, consideration has been given to the likely impact, and likely consequences for:

(a)   the current and future social, economic, environmental, or cultural well-being of the district or region

(b)   any persons who are likely to be particularly affected by, or interested in, the decision.

(c)   the capacity of the local authority to perform its role, and the financial and other costs of doing so.

(d)   the impacts of construction on residents and businesses and the staggered construction programme proposed along the corridor.

43.     In accordance with the considerations above, criteria and thresholds in the policy, it is considered that the decision is of high significance.

Next Steps

44.     Subject to Council’s decision to endorse the submission of the Business case to Waka Kotahi for their decision-making the next steps for this project include:

(a)     Waka Kotahi decision-making including:

(i)      Waka Kotahi full internal investment decision-making review – programmed from January – March 2024. This will enable Waka Kotahi to finalise the current ‘Final-draft’ business case; and

(ii)      Waka Kotahi Board decision-making – programmed for March 2024

(b)     The pre-implementation activities including Detailed Design, Service Investigation and Pavement reviews may commence prior to Waka Kotahi funding approval of the DBC. These required works can utilise IFF funding until the DBC is approved by Waka Kotahi however the Waka Kotahi funding contribution for sunk costs would be lost. This will be considered as part of the Detailed Design commencement process.

(c)     Co-ordinated integration of Three Waters component into Detailed Design phase.

Attachments

1.       Appendix A. - Cameron Road Stage 2 Detailed Business Case - Final - A15282295 (Separate Attachments 1)  

2.       Appendix B - Overall Programme - A15330117 (Separate Attachments 1)   

 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

11.5       Accessible Streets Otumoetai Business Case Approval

File Number:           A14432476

Author:                    Karen Hay, Team Leader: Cycle Plan Implementation

Authoriser:              Nic Johansson, General Manager: Infrastructure

 

Purpose of the Report

1.       This report presents the outcome of the consultation and engagement on the Accessible Streets Ōtūmoetai project, notes where community consultation has led to changes to the design,  and the preferred option for inclusion within the business case.

2.       Seeks approval from Council for the Accessible Streets for Ōtūmoetai business case.

 

Recommendations

That the Council:

(a)     Receives the report "Accessible Streets Otumoetai Business Case Approval".

(b)     It recommends that the Council approves:

(i)      The business case for Accessible Streets for Ōtūmoetai noting that any minor changes to the business case be approved by the General Manager Infrastructure.

(ii)      The revised design and the associated design changes in response to community feedback as outlined in Appendix A of this report.

(iii)     In the event that Waka Kotahi partnership funding and the business case is approved, the project proceeds to final design and implementation, noting that any substantial design changes will be consulted on with directly affected residents only.

 

 

Executive Summary

3.       Tauranga’s population is expected to grow by up to 78,000 people over the next 50 years, dramatically affecting the way our city looks, feels, and operates. Transport options will need to evolve to meet the needs of a growing population. There is a clear community desire in Ōtūmoetai to improve transport options and Council sees a clear case to proceed with work to improve the situation.

4.       If we continue at our current rate of car use, congestion across the transport network will only increase. While we recognise people will continue to drive, rebalancing how existing street space is used will provide people more options for how they get around, encouraging changes in travel habits and enabling us to prepare our city for the future. It will be vital that  we enable more people to get around safely in low-carbon ways, so we can support growing neighbourhoods, keep traffic flowing for freight and people who need to drive, and a more sustainable future for Tauranga.

5.       The Accessible Streets for Ōtūmoetai Peninsula project is in response to the growing need for safe, sustainable, and convenient travel options in the area. With easy access to schools, community hubs, shops, and the city centre, the peninsula offers an ideal location to support alternative ways of getting around such as walking, biking or using public transport.

6.       The changes being proposed in the area will be a combination of permanent changes, alongside transitional or temporary.  Whether walking, riding, or using public transport, people will have more options for how they can get to and from work, school, or tertiary study, local shops, or sports and recreation.

7.       The temporary changes enable testing of the design prior to making it permanent. This recognises some of the concerns expressed when a project is only on paper can often be resolved once interim installations are in place, providing valuable community feedback in real time  for any permanent upgrade. The temporary changes will look a little different and they will take time to get used to, however they will help to get the bike network and bus improvements in place quickly at a lower cost, so more people can benefit sooner.

8.       Community feedback in October 2022 and subsequent consultation has driven the project's development, with strong community support for the preferred options. The project focuses on retrofitting multi-modal infrastructure into existing streets, addressing challenges through a range of solutions and community input.

9.       The consultation process involved various community engagement activities, with the majority of respondents supporting the project's potential benefits. Feedback led to design changes and improvements based on community input, ensuring a more inclusive approach. Of the 589 responses received related to the design, 50% were supportive or supportive with suggestions, while 32% disagreed with specific design elements, 17% were opposed to the project, and 1% were neutral.

10.     The project's significance is marked by its critical role in the transport network and interdependencies with related projects. Accessible Streets is highly dependent on delivering cycleways, safety improvements, walking enhancements, and public transport infrastructure to enable improved travel options. A failure to deliver could prevent benefits from being fully realised and delay the realisation of interdependent projects for more than three years.

11.     Key stakeholders, including Waka Kotahi Transport Agency, various Tauranga City Council (TCC) departments, Bay of Plenty Regional Council, Mana Whenua, local schools, local businesses, and advocacy groups, have contributed to the project's development.

12.     Full project costs (implementation and business case) total $81.8 M.  The project benefit cost ratio is 2.2.

13.     A single stage business case has now been completed (Attachment D) and requires approval by both Council and Waka Kotahi

14.     Next steps would involve the approval of the project by the Waka Kotahi Board, anticipated in March/April 2024, with detailed design and implementation to follow. 

Background

15.     Ōtūmoetai Peninsula is identified as one of the priority areas to deliver safe, convenient, healthy, and environmentally friendly travel options due to its expected growth and the high number of trips that can easily be taken by foot, bus, bike, or scooter. Schools, community hubs, shops and reserves, as well as the city centre, are all within a reasonable distance, which provide an opportunity to enable active modes of transport.

16.     The consultation and engagement in October 2022 sought feedback on possible options on the primary routes within the peninsula and received strong community support. The Council endorsed the preferred options for consultation in November 2022. The report can be accessed here.

17.     The preferred option was developed into an early design with consultation and engagement on those proposals occurring in June/July 2023. The feedback has been valuable to help inform the final proposed design.

18.     Building multi-modal infrastructure for bus and people walking, biking scootering while managing the impacts on car travel has its challenges because of the need to retrofit them into established streets.

19.     A range of solutions have been developed to address different requirements and circumstances.  Wherever possible, amendments have been made to the design in response to the feedback received.

20.     A hybrid approach to cycleways is proposed.  In some areas, we propose a transitional approach (temporary) for the cycleway, in other areas, a transformational (permanent) approach.

21.     A transitional approach enables the installation of temporary improvements that invite more people to walk, bike or use public transport much sooner than if a permanent treatment was applied immediately. As well as making it possible for people to start changing the way they get around earlier, concerns can often be resolved easily once the interim installations have settled in, and it is no longer just a plan on paper.  Using temporary materials will enable the Council to gather useful community feedback, based on real-life experience of the change.

22.     A transitional approach is maintained between three and five years, after which a permanent solution is developed. 

Strategic / Statutory Context

23.     With Tauranga's rapid population growth over the last 30 years and predictions of further growth, along with the increasing dependency on private vehicles (84% of trips), investment in improving journey times for freight, improving access to key growth areas, active modes and public transport becomes crucial.

24.     The UFTI Connected Centres Programme and the Transport System Plan paves the way for a future-focused land use and transport program. Both the Council and Government agencies acknowledge the substantial role, amongst other initiatives, that active modes and public transport plays in managing congestion.

25.     The Ōtūmoetai Peninsula Spatial Plan underscores the importance of creating liveable, healthy, connected, and unique neighbourhoods, a goal that has underpinned the Accessible Streets project.

26.     The Tauranga Accessible Streets Programme, (endorsed as part of UFTI), has a key focus to increase active travel mode share and improve safety. The programmes emphasis is to provide a connected network to work and education and optimise existing infrastructure.

27.     Collectively these plans address the challenges posed by Tauranga's rapid growth, highlighting the increasing difficulty of accessing economic and social opportunities through the transportation system, especially during peak times.

Options Analysis

28.     Option analysis was completed as part of the business case process and consulted upon with the community in late 2022. This was followed by the development of an early design. Consultation on the proposed design was undertaken in June/July 2023. The preferred option has been informed by both constraints within existing street layout and community feedback.

29.     The business case for the Accessible Streets for Ōtūmoetai project also covers the range of options considered, and is attached in Attachment D.

30.     The key objectives of the project are:

a)      Improved access to employment, education and social opportunities by active modes and public transport.

b)      Improved cultural, environmental and health outcomes measured by reduction in CO2 emissions. 

c)      Improved safety for people using active travel modes measured by a reduction in death and serious injuries.

31.     Key performance indicators are attached in Attachment B.

Financial Considerations

32.     The implementation P50 cost estimate (including 30% risk allowance) of the project is $62.98M.

33.     With the additional funding risk allowance (95th percentile) the implementation cost is 78.8M. The 95th percentile is an additional financial provision to provide for uncertainty in relation to the estimate inputs and project related threats and opportunities with a potential cost impact. These costs include:

(a)     $52.1M associated with safety improvements such as pedestrian crossings, intersection upgrades, landscaping, cultural enhancements and cycle improvements.

(b)     $3.8M for Neighbourhood Streets and

(c)     $22.9M Passenger transport infrastructure improvements and bus priority.

34.     This cost estimate is $24M less than is estimated in the current draft LTP initially estimated at $103M. This reduction in cost is attributable to utilising a transitional approach in some areas of the project as well as changes to the design as a result of community feedback. 

35.     Full project costs (implementation and business case) total $81.8 M.  The project benefit cost ratio is 2.2.

  Legal Implications / Risks

36.     A summary of key risks include:

(a)     The cost of the recommended option exceeding available funding (unknowns, construction cost, inflationary / market pressures etc).  This has been mitigated with a risk allowance of 30% over the base estimate.

(b)     Cost increases associated with geotechnical conditions or service relocations:  Service identification will be undertaken prior to construction commencing.

(c)     The project does not meet the expectation of the community and key stakeholders. This has been mitigated by responding to community feedback with changes made to the design to the maximum extent possible, while utilising a transitional approach in some areas.

Consultation / Engagement

Engagement and consultation approach

37.     Feedback from the Ōtūmoetai Spatial Plan underpinned and informed the Accessible Streets project where there was strong support for providing active transport options, connected neighbourhoods both within and to the city centre. The key routes for the project were shared with the community.

38.     In October 2022, we asked our community for their views on getting to, from and around the Ōtūmoetai Peninsula and presented different options to make it safer and easier for people to bike, scooter, catch a bus or walk within the Ōtūmoetai Peninsula, as well as into the city centre. Engagement methods included a public survey, workshops, webinars, meetings, and drop-in sessions.

39.     One option was clearly preferred by the community, allowing Council to endorse an emerging preferred option, and the project team prepared an early design of this option.

40.     In June 2023, we wanted to talk specifically with people who live, work, play and go to school in the Ōtūmoetai Peninsula and talk through the early design potential outcomes and benefits.

41.     We let local media know about the consultation. 11,000 letters were  sent to residents and businesses in the Ōtūmoetai Peninsula area. The letter had a QR code people could scan with their phone to be taken to our website for more information, see the early design in detail, fill in our survey and share their thoughts.

42.     Door knocks and letter drops were undertaken to some 380 properties and business owners inviting them to provide feedback.

43.     Ōtūmoetai is a large geographic area, and ensuring the project was well known and that there were opportunities to provide feedback was critical.  The survey was designed so people could give as little or as much feedback as they liked on the areas or the route that they were interested in. The summary engagement report and associated feedback from the consultation and engagement can be found in Attachment C.

Summary of feedback

44.     534 people made submissions, of which:

(a)     153 people attended the drop-in sessions,

(b)     355 people completed the online survey, and

(c)     26 people provided feedback via email.

45.     Of the responses received online, 56% were from people living in Ōtūmoetai and Matua. Most responses (52%) related to the early design between Harington Street and the Ōtūmoetai roundabout, Maxwells Road and Bureta shops.

46.     Of the 589 responses received in relation to the design, 50% were supportive or supportive with suggestions while 32% disagreed with specific design elements, 17% were opposed to the project and 1% were neutral.

47.     Those who supported the design said it will be safer for people (particularly children) to walk and bike, while also reducing vehicle speeds, and making it easier to cross the road at intersections.

48.     Those who opposed design elements, noted  that there may be an increase in congestion and frustration for drivers. There was also some opposition to removal of parking and in-lane bus stops.

49.     Non design related opposition was due to a variety of factors. The key themes that emerged were:

(a)     A view that a low number of people currently cycle in the area,

(b)     roads should be prioritised for cars,

(c)     frustration with other transport projects in the city, including  the Cameron Road project. 

(d)     utilise alternative routes for the project . 

(e)     that the project overall is not a good use of money.

50.     We have carefully listened to the feedback provided and based on this; changes have been made to the consulted design. A summary of changes and rationale are attached in Attachment A.

51.     Changes made to the design has not compromised the objectives of the business case as outlined in item 15 above.

Public Transport priority and in-lane bus stops.

52.     There has been strong community support to make it easier and more convenient to use public transport. Some respondents raised concern about in-lane bus stops as it will cause congestion.

53.     While the preference is to provide greater bus priority, we understand the concern from the local community regarding in-lane bus stops and potential for increased congestion. In-lane bus stops have been carefully considered.

54.     Constrained road space in some locations means that indenting bus stops cannot be achieved without the potential for property purchase from adjacent landowners.

55.     Of the 34 bus stops, 8 are in-lane where passing will not be possible, 20 are indented and a further 6 are placed where drivers could pass using the adjacent lane and/or where there is sufficient space to pass when safe to do so.

HIGH LEVEL SUMMARY OF KEY CHANGES IN response to feedback.

56.     Where possible, several changes have been made in response to feedback from the community. These responses include either transitional or permanent changes. More detailed responses to feedback are attached in Attachment A.

Route section and key feedback points

High level response

Section 1 - Chapel Street (Harington St to Maxwells Rd)

 

The original proposal suggested one-way cycleways and shared paths along both sides with the removal of a traffic lane from SH2 across the Chapel Street bridge.

A lane is reallocated for a bus priority lane from Vale Street heading towards Chapel Street bridge.

Key Feedback Points

· While there was support for changes proposed, there was also strong opposition to removal of the lane from SH2 causing congestion.

· Signalisation of Maxwells intersection causes congestion.

· Concern around the safety of the current zebra crossing across Chapel Street in the vicinity of Maxwells Road.

· In-lane bus stops are of concern.

· Support for bus priority measures.

· The traffic lane between SH2 and north of Bay Central signals is reinstated.

· From the Chapel Street bridge to Maxwells Road, a transitional approach is proposed. The traffic lane is allocated for a cycle path for approximately 300m across Chapel Street bridge.  

· The transitional approach uses temporary materials such as hit sticks that enables feedback and evaluation of the impacts of the change, prior to implementation of any permanent solution.

· Maxwells Road intersection signals are removed and replaced with a pedestrian signalised crossing.

· As a result of community concerns and the urgency around safety, the zebra crossing is to be signalised in early 2024.

· All bus stops along this section have the ability for people to pass with an adjacent lane available. Limited space precludes further indentation.

Section 2 - Maxwells Road, Andrew Place and a section of Pillans Point Road – Neighbourhood Streets

 

The original proposal includes traffic calming with a number of speed humps, a 30km/h speed limit and a shared path connecting to the estuary from Chapel Street. Pedestrian crossings at Andrew Place.

Key Feedback Points

· Strong support overall for the changes but lack of support for speed humps as they create noise.

· Support for 30km/h variable speed limit during school times only.

· Path along estuary is supported.

· Investigate safety issues with parking on Andrew Place.

· Concern with location of crossings on the corner of Andrew Place being too close to the intersection.

· Speed humps removed and will no longer proceed.

· 30km/h variable speed limit during school times only.

· Path along estuary has been implemented.

· We will investigate safety issues associated with parking on Andrew Place.

· Location of crossings will be reviewed during the next phase of the project.

Section 3 - Ngatai Road between Maxwells Rd to Ōtūmoetai roundabout.

 

The consulted design included a two-way cycleway, in-lane bus stops, improvements to pedestrian crossings and traffic lights at the Bureta intersection and Ōtūmoetai roundabout.

Key Feedback Points

· Opposition to signalising Ōtūmoetai roundabout.

· Support for signals at Bureta Shops intersection although some prefer a roundabout.

· Overall support for safety improvements.

· Concern about in-lane bus stops because they create congestion.

· Parking removal is of concern.

 

· A transitional approach to the cycle way is proposed using a temporary separator. Retains cycleway within kerb lines for most of the route precluding the need to underground some overhead lines.

· Parking is important and rather than have one-way cycleways on both sides of the road, a two-way cycleway is proposed that retains most the parking on the adjacent side of the road.

· The roundabout at Ōtūmoetai Road is retained but additional dedicated pedestrian crossings on raised safety tables are provided. This also maintains the Kauri tree in the roundabout.

· The renewal of the Ōtūmoetai rail bridge will enable additional options for a crossing on the seaward side of Ōtūmoetai roundabout. Space constraints preclude any options at the present time.

· In-lane bus stops are challenging to avoid in this section due to space constraints.

· Between Ōtūmoetai Roundabout and Maxwells Road, there are 8 existing bus stops. Ten bus stops are proposed in the design.

· Four of these are in- lane where there is insufficient space to indent them, while four are indented. Two additional bus stops have been added close to Maxwells Road intersection.  One of which is in the bus lane. People are able to pass this in the adjacent traffic lane while the other can be passed using the adjacent flush median.

· Modelling has shown an average delay of 30 seconds with +- 10% variability. This means an average of 2-minute additional travel time for drivers.

Section 4 - Bureta shops and Bureta Road

The consulted design includes a 2.5m shared path along Bureta Road connecting Ngatai Road to Vale Street, signalising the Bureta and Ngatai Road intersection, upgrading bus shelters and bus stops, and building new pedestrian crossings on raised safety platforms.

Key Feedback Points

· Support for improved safety, accessibility, and landscaping

· Preference for separated cycleways as opposed to shared path.

· Parking removal and in-lane bus stops were of concern.

 

· This area has a high placemaking function. This means that our proposal includes landscaping, wider footpaths and overall, a more traffic calmed space that improves the amenity, safety and accessibility of the area. For this reason, cycle lanes are not able to be provided without significant impact on parking.

· Of the 50 carparks, 8 are removed to enable the shared path and crossing facilities.

· Safety of pedestrians are a high priority. The crossing provides better access and safety for all ages and abilities.

· There are two bus stops, one is currently in-lane and the other not. During the next stage of design, we will review one of the bus stops with a view to indent the bus stop by considering potential underground service risk and space available.

Section 5 Ōtūmoetai Road from Ōtūmoetai roundabout to Norton Road

The consulted design replaces the Ōtūmoetai roundabout with traffic lights, creates cycle lanes along Ōtūmoetai Road from the existing roundabout to Norton Road, and features new and existing pedestrian crossing upgrades. As a result of these changes, 13 carparks would be reduced to seven. No car parking changes are proposed on Cherrywood Drive within the shopping area.

Key Feedback Points

· Opposition to signalising Ōtūmoetai roundabout.

· The cycle lanes should be protected from traffic and extend further along Ōtūmoetai road.

· Overall support for safety and accessibility improvements

· Parking removal is of concern.

· A crossing opposite the stairs from Carlton Street is required to support students crossing Ōtūmoetai Road.

· Concern that Ōtūmoetai Road has not been included for students to access Ōtūmoetai Primary.

· The Ōtūmoetai roundabout and the kauri tree is retained. Please refer Section 3 above.

· A crossing for students opposite the stairs is programmed for delivery within the FY25 financial year.

· We will, through the next phase of the design investigate opportunities for additional protection from traffic for cycling, without impacting on access to parking.

· Parking needs have been carefully considered within the design, but some trade-offs are needed to provide improved accessibility and safety. 

· We agree that accessibility improvements are needed to Ōtūmoetai Primary. This will be programmed within our safety programme between 2025 and 2027.

Section 6 Windsor Road from Ngatai Road, Charles Street to Bellevue Road

A two-way cycleway on the school side of Windsor Road. To accommodate the two-way cycleway and retain parking on both sides of the road, this option removes a general traffic lane on Charles Street and Windsor Road between Ngatai Road and Anne Road to introduce a one-way circulation system.

Key Feedback Points

· Opposition to one way system extending to Anne Road. It should terminate at Princess Road.

· Some people say accessibility and pedestrian improvements have not been addressed to support Bellevue Primary School. The footpaths are narrow and in poor condition.

· Additional crossing is needed at the pools and tennis court.

· Consider opportunities for a kiss and ride to support drop off and pick up at Ōtūmoetai college.

· This section is permanent given the high volume of students accessing the area.

· The one-way system now terminates at Princess Road. The resulting impact within the design is removal of additional parking.

· The design will be reviewed to reduce the width of the shared path at the bus stop and reinstate parking to the maximum extent possible. Consultation with directly affected residents and the school to find a balanced solution at this location. 

· There is also potential to time restrict parking during school drop off and pick up times to ensure that a kiss and ride can be implemented.

· Footpath upgrades and accessibility improvements will be programmed for delivery in consultation with Bellevue Primary school.

· An additional crossing will be investigated as part of the next stage of the project.

 

Section 7 Princess Road, Queen Road, Anne Road and Margaret Road

The consulted design creates a neighbourhood safer street area with speed bumps to slow vehicles down and upgraded pedestrian crossings. Some street parking will be removed, and changes made to support the one-way traffic system proposed on Windsor Road

Key Feedback Points

· Opposition to one way system extending to Anne Road.

· Concern around speed humps, would prefer wider footpaths and increased tree planting and landscaping.

· Support for pedestrian crossing facilities but some need to be moved back from the intersection.

· Access/footpath improvements required to support Bellevue Primary School students.

· One way system terminates at Princess Road

· Speed humps are removed. Landscaping opportunities and footpath renewals will be considered as part of the next stage of design.

· Review of location of crossings undertaken at next stage of design.

· Access and footpath improvements investigations to be undertaken in consultation with Bellevue Primary school.

Section 8 Bellevue Road - from Windsor Road to 15 Bellevue Road

The consulted design includes two-way cycle facility on southern side of Bellevue Road, changing to one-way facility south of the Brookfield roundabout. A signalised crossing will be provided for cyclists to transition from one facility type to another and for pedestrians to access bus stops.  

Key Feedback Points

· Strong support around improved safety and accessibility

· Concern around the impact on trees.

· In-lane bus stops are of concern.

· Removal of parking is of concern for some.

· Lack of support for shared paths with separated cycle facilities is preferred.

 

 

 

· A transitional approach is now proposed with temporary separators for the cycleway.

· This means the removal of the flush median between Sharon Place and Waihi Road Intersection and narrower, but safe lane widths.

· The flush median is retained for pedestrian refuges, at key intersection and at access into New World carpark.

· This approach enables people to provide feedback on the changes prior to it made permanent.

· A transitional approach now enables the trees to be retained.

· The exception is two trees close to Jefferson Place will need to be removed. As a result of design changes, trees as Lees Park are also now retained.

· Where trees cannot be retained, additional planting of trees will be planted in consultation with urban foresters.

· Shared paths are isolated to absolute minimum. Within a very constrained environment, separated facilities cannot be achieved without significant impact on other road users.

Section 9 - Waihi Road and 11th Avenue

Combination of one-way cycleways / shared paths and bus priority measures. The removal of a city bound traffic lane between the slip lane exit to Takitimu Drive and Edgecumbe Road to provide space for a bus/transit lane. Conversion of citybound parking between Edgecumbe Road and Cameron Road to an AM peak bus. On-street parking would be removed here during the am peak travel times. 

Key Points

·    Concerns that the bus lane along 11th Ave will create congestion.

·    Request this be part time only or a T3 transit lane.

·    Impact of changes to access for businesses

·    Planting of trees to improve the amenity of the area.

·    In-lane bus stops is of concern.

·    Frequency of bus services to be improved.

· We agree with the proposal that the bus lane only be operational during the morning peak being 7am to 9am. This will be further evaluated should the need arise. Unfortunately, a transit lane cannot be applied in this instance due to the short distance of the bus lane.

· Staff have worked closely with business owners to discuss their concerns and address these the design. This includes:

Access is reinstated to McDonalds and 11th Avenue shops off Waihi Road.

Met with businesses in vicinity of Koromiko Street who helped inform how the design could best accommodate their needs.

· We will seek opportunities to improve the amenity of the area through the next stage of the project.

· All bus stops in this section can be passed or an adjacent traffic lane is available.

· The Bay of Plenty Regional Council is developing a business case to improve frequency of buses.

 

57.     The Automobile Association and Sustainable Bay of Plenty submission is attached in Appendix K and L.

Significance

58.     The Local Government Act 2002 requires an assessment of the significance of matters, issues, proposals and decisions in this report against Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.  Council acknowledges that in some instances a matter, issue, proposal or decision may have a high degree of importance to individuals, groups, or agencies affected by the report.

59.     In making this assessment, consideration has been given to the likely impact, and likely consequences for:

a)   the current and future social, economic, environmental, or cultural well-being of the district or region.

b)   any persons who are likely to be particularly affected by, or interested in, the matter.

c)   the capacity of the local authority to perform its role, and the financial and other costs of doing so.

d)   In accordance with the considerations above, criteria and thresholds in the policy, it is considered that the matter is of medium significance the current and future social, economic, environmental, or cultural well-being of the district or region.

e)   any persons who are likely to be particularly affected by, or interested in, the matter.

f)    the capacity of the local authority to perform its role, and the financial and other costs of doing so.

60.     In accordance with the considerations above, criteria and thresholds in the policy, it is considered that the matter is of medium significance.

ENGAGEMENT

61.     Taking into consideration the above assessment, that the matter is of medium significance, officers are of the opinion that no further engagement is required prior to Council making a decision.

Next Steps

62.     The following are key milestones for the project:

Milestone

Date

Single Stage Business Case

May 2022 - Dec 2023

Waka Kotahi Board Business Case and funding approval

Jan 2024 - Mar 2024

Detailed Design, Consenting, Procurement

May 2024 - Jan 2026

Council update report

Jul 2024 - Aug 2024

Construction

Oct 2024 - Jan 2027

 

Attachments

1.       Attachment A - Accessible Streets for Otumoetai summary of consultation feedback and response - A15340017 (Separate Attachments 2)  

2.       Attachment B - Key Performance Indicators - A15343732 (Separate Attachments 2)  

3.       Attachment C - Consultation and engagement summary report - A15343728 (Separate Attachments 2)  

4.       Attachment D -Draft Single Stage Business Case for the _t_moetai Peninsula - A15343729 (Separate Attachments 2)  

5.       Attachment E Concept Design Chapel Street between Harington and Maxwells Road - A15355383 (Separate Attachments 2)  

6.       Attachment F Concept Design  Maxwells Road, Andrew Place and a section of Pillans Point Road - A15343726 (Separate Attachments 2)  

7.       Attachment G Concept Design  Ngatai Road between Vale Street and Crescent Road including Bureta Shops - A15343725 (Separate Attachments 2)  

8.       Attachment H Concept Design Otumoetai Roundabout including Otumoetai Road - A15355419 (Separate Attachments 2)  

9.       Attachment I Concept Design Ngatai Road-Charles Street -Windsor Road-Belllevue Road-Waihi Road-Eleventh Avenue - A15355428 (Separate Attachments 2)  

10.     Attachment J Concept Design Neighbourhood Streets Princess Road and Queen Road - A15355440 (Separate Attachments 2)  

11.     Attachment K BOP AA Submission on Accesssible Streets Otumoetai 2023-07 - A15359759 (Separate Attachments 2)  

12.     Attachment L Sustainable BOP Submission on Accesssible Streets Otumoetai 2023-07 - A15359758 (Separate Attachments 2)   

 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

11.6       Traffic & Parking Bylaw Amendment 48

File Number:           A15128655

Author:                    Will Hyde, Senior Transportation Engineer

Authoriser:              Nic Johansson, General Manager: Infrastructure

 

Purpose of the Report

1.      To obtain a resolution from the Commission to introduce various traffic controls to the Traffic and Parking Bylaw (2012) Attachments.

 

Recommendations

That the Council:

(a)     Receives the report "Traffic & Parking Bylaw Amendment 48".

(b)     Resolves to adopt the proposed traffic and parking controls as per Appendix A relating to minor changes for general safety, operational or amenity purposes, to become effective on or after 12 December 2023 subject to appropriate signs and road markings being installed.

(c)     Resolves to adopt the proposed traffic and parking controls as per Appendix B relating to the Cameron Road Multi-modal Project (Stage 1), to become effective on or after 12 December 2023 subject to appropriate signs and markings being installed

 

 

Executive Summary

2.       The Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2012 includes Attachments which list various traffic and parking restrictions.  Council can amend the Attachments by Council Resolution.

3.       This report sets out amendments to the following Attachments:

(a)     Attachment 3.1: Shared Pedestrian / Cycle Paths & Cycle Paths (in Road Reserve)

(b)     Attachment 4.1:   Special Vehicle Lanes – Passenger Service Vehicle Lanes (Including Bus Lanes)

(c)     Attachment 4.3:   Special Vehicle Lanes – Cycle Lanes

(d)     Attachment 7.1:   No Parking Behind Kerb

(e)     Attachment 7.2: Prohibited Stopping and Standing of Vehicles

(f)      Attachment 7.7    Mobility Parking

(g)     Attachment 7.8:   Motorcycle Parking

(h)     Attachment 7.9:   Parking Time Restrictions

(i)      Attachment 7.12: Pay Areas

(j)      Attachment 7.15: Loading Zones

(k)     Attachment 7.21: Passenger Service and Other Vehicle Stands (Stopping Places for Buses)

4.       Appendix A sets out proposed changes for general safety and operational reasons, principally requests from the public or other stakeholders for numerous small changes to parking controls which traffic engineering staff have deemed to be appropriate.

5.       Appendix B sets out changes which are required in order to formalise and enable operation and enforcement of the various changes on Cameron Road and its immediate side roads, as part of the Cameron Road Multi-modal Project (Stage 1).

6.       All proposed amendments will become operational on 12 December 2023 or when the appropriate signs and markings are put in place, except for the bus lanes on Cameron Road which will become operational following a public awareness campaign, expected to be in March 2024.

Background

7.       The amendments set out in Appendix A are changes proposed to reflect and support operational and safety needs on the road network.

8.       The proposed amendments are minor changes to parking restrictions across the city which have arisen through requests from the public, transportation staff or other stakeholders; changes resulting from approved developments; plus other minor changes deemed necessary by the Network Safety and Sustainability team.

9.       The amendments set out in Appendix B are required in order to formalise various sections of the Cameron Road project which are recently completed or will be completed by the end of December 2023.

Strategic / Statutory Context

10.     The amendments achieve the vision and strategic transport priorities to help make our network safer and easier for people to get around the city.

Options Analysis

11.     For proposed changes for general operational reasons, the reasons for each proposal are described in Appendix A.  In each case the problem identified is expected to continue if the proposed amendment is not adopted.

12.     For proposed changes for the Cameron Road project set out in Appendix B, numerous traffic controls which form part of the project will not be able to be enforced if the proposed amendment is not adopted.

Financial Considerations

13.     Negligible – the signs and markings costs associated with general operational changes can be accommodated within existing project or operational budgets.

14.     The signs and markings associated with Cameron Rd have been implemented using approved project budget.

Legal Implications / Risks

15.     The bylaw amendment is needed to allow enforcement of changes deemed necessary for safety and amenity purposes.

Consultation / Engagement

16.     The amendments proposed in Appendix A have been assessed as being of a minor nature.

17.     Consultation is not required for minor stopping and parking amendments, or other minor amendments required to support operational or safety improvements.

18.     The amendments proposed in Appendix B have been widely consulted as part of the Cameron Road project.

Significance

19.     The Local Government Act 2002 requires an assessment of the significance of matters, issues, proposals and decisions in this report against Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.  Council acknowledges that in some instances a matter, issue, proposal or decision may have a high degree of importance to individuals, groups, or agencies affected by the report.

20.     In making this assessment, consideration has been given to the likely impact, and likely consequences for:

(a)   the current and future social, economic, environmental, or cultural well-being of the district or region

(b)   any persons who are likely to be particularly affected by, or interested in, the decision.

(c)   the capacity of the local authority to perform its role, and the financial and other costs of doing so.

In accordance with the considerations above, criteria and thresholds in the policy, it is considered that the decision is of low significance.

ENGAGEMENT

21.     Taking into consideration the above assessment, that the decision is of low significance, officers are of the opinion that no further engagement is required prior to Council making a decision.

Next Steps

22.     Once approved, no immediate action is required.  The changes will allow officers to issue permits as and when required. 

Attachments

1.       Appendix A - T&P Bylaw Amendment 48 - A15371141

2.       Appendix B - T&P Bylaw Amendment 48 - A15371142  

 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 







Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 













 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

11.7       Adopt Reviewed Traffic and Parking Bylaw

File Number:           A15314994

Author:                    Vicky Grant-Ussher, Policy Analyst

Authoriser:              Nic Johansson, General Manager: Infrastructure

 

Purpose of the Report

1.      To formally adopt the Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2023.

 

Recommendations

That the Council:

(a)     Receives the report "Adopt Reviewed Traffic and Parking Bylaw ".

(b)     Approves the recommendation of the Strategy, Finance and Risk Committee of 4 December 2023 and adopts the draft Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2023 (Attachment One), pursuant to section 145 of the Local Government Act and section 22AB of the Land Transport Act to be brought into force on 20 December 2023.

(c)     Resolves that, in accordance with section 155 of the Local Government Act 2002, the proposed draft Traffic and Parking Bylaw is the most appropriate and proportionate way of addressing the perceived problem and does not give rise to any implications under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990.

(d)     Delegates to the General Manager Infrastructure, the authority to make any minor edits or presentation amendments to the draft Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2023 to correct any identified errors or typographical edits, before the bylaw comes into force.

(e)     Notes that Council resolutions made under the current Traffic and Parking Bylaw, as set out in the Traffic and Parking Bylaw Attachment[2], remain operative.

 

 

Discussion

2.       On 4 December 2023 the Strategy, Finance and Risk Committee deliberated on the Traffic and Parking Bylaw review which is due for statutory review and resolved the following:

Committee Resolution SFR9/23/1

Moved:       Commissioner Stephen Selwood

Seconded:  Commissioner Shadrach Rolleston

That the Strategy, Finance and Risk Committee:

(a)     Receives the report "Deliberations Report for Traffic and Parking Bylaw".

(b)     Notes that work is underway to address mobility parking concerns in the city centre

(c)     Agrees to the following updates to the Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2012:

(i)      clarifying that secondary vehicle crossings require written council approval

(ii)      introducing a registered parking category to better monitor time-limited parking with implementation subject to a further Council resolution

(iii)     incorporating drafting changes to the bylaw to clarify that council may issue approval through electronic permits

(iv)     removing redundant provisions now covered under relevant legislation to reflect legislative updates since the last review, correcting an omission and editorial changes to improve clarity.

(d)     Recommends to Council:

(i)      the adoption of the draft Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2023 (Attachment One), pursuant to section 145 of the Local Government Act and section 22AB of the Land Transport Act to be bought into force on 20 December 2023

(ii)      to resolve that, in accordance with section 155 of the Local Government Act 2002, the proposed draft Traffic and Parking Bylaw is the most appropriate and proportionate way of addressing the perceived problem and does not give rise to any implications under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990

(iii)     to delegate to the General Manager Infrastructure, the authority to make any minor edits or presentation amendments to the draft Traffic and Parking Bylaw 2023 to correct any identified errors or typographical edits, before the bylaw comes into force.

CARRIED

3.       A copy of the deliberations report and section 155 analysis is provided as Attachment Two.

Next Steps

4.       In accordance with the Local Government Act 2002, Council will give public notice of the bylaw and when it will take effect on the council website including through a public notice in the newspaper on the 16 December 2023. In accordance with the Land Transport Act 1998, we will provide a copy of the bylaw to the Minister of Transport within a week of the approval of the bylaw.

Attachments

1.       Traffic and Parking Bylaw - A15348216

2.       Deliberations report and section 155 analysis - A15348049  

 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 



















Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 













 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

11.8       Mount Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park

File Number:           A15341723

Author:                    Sarah Pearce, Organisational Design Lead

Authoriser:              Barbara Dempsey, General Manager: Community Services

 

Purpose of the Report

1.      The purpose of this report is to present Bay Venues Ltd’s proposal for the Mount Holiday Park to Council, along with a discussion of the proposal, and to seek Council direction regarding next steps.

 

Recommendations

That the Council:

(a)     Receives the report "Mount Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park".

(b)     Decides to:

(i)      Transfer the assets and management of the Mount Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park to Bay Venues Ltd, effective 1 July 2024, subject to financial due diligence and completing engagement with tangata whenua, and noting that ownership of the land remains with Council. Approves the inclusion of updated financials based on this decision in the LTP deliberations process;  or

(ii)      Retain the ownership and operations of Mount Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park ‘in-house’ (status quo)

 

Executive Summary

2.       The Mount Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park is a Council owned facility in Mt Maunganui. Bay Venues Ltd has approached the Council to propose that the assets and management of the Holiday Park are transferred to Bay Venues by 1 July 2024.

3.       The Holiday Park is a high-profile asset, located adjacent to the Mauao Historic Reserve, and Mount Hot Pools.

4.       There are benefits and risks associated with a potential transfer of the assets and management of the Holiday Park to Bay Venues. Council has also sought independent advice on the matter, which is detailed in the report and attachment.

Background

Mt Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park

5.       The Mount Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park (The Holiday Park) is a Tauranga City Council (Council) owned camping facility, located at 1 Adams Avenue, Mt Maunganui. The Holiday Park has been operating continuously since its establishment in the 1930s. It provides a range of camping facilities for holidaymakers and is one of the premier campgrounds in New Zealand. The site is culturally, strategically and commercially significant, due to its location next to the main Mount Maunganui beach, Mauao and the Mount Hot Pools.

6.       The Holiday Park is situated on Reserve land and is classified under the Reserves Act 1977 as a Coastal Reserve (p264-265 of Reserve Management Plan)[3]. It is not listed as a strategic asset within Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.

7.       A range of accommodation options are provided by the Holiday Park, from cabins through to camping sites, and there are currently 13 employees responsible for its day to day running, with 6 of these being permanent staff. There were 88,903 booked nights of accommodation at the park in 2022/23, a 19% increase on the previous year. The profits generated by the Holiday are commercially important for Council, and are used for site improvements, both at the Holiday Park and on surrounding areas, especially Mauao, as well as to pay down Council debt.

8.       The Holiday Park is currently managed entirely in-house by Council. Bay Venues Ltd have approached Council with a proposal which seeks transfer of assets and management of the Holiday Park to themselves (noting that the ownership of the land would remain with Council).

Bay Venues Ltd.

9.       Bay Venues Ltd (BVL) is a Council Controlled Organisation that manages 24 community facilities on behalf of Council.  BVL has a strong relationship with Council and a proven track record of successfully managing Council owned facilities for the benefit of the community.

10.     The current portfolio of facilities managed by BVL is diverse, including large, purpose-built facilities such as BayWave and Mercury Arena, through to small community centres across the city. BVL own and operate the Mount Hot Pools, this facility is adjacent to the Holiday Park.

Map of the Holiday Park and Mount Hot Pools

Proposal to transfer the Holiday Park to Bay Venues Ltd

11.     BVL approached Council in late 2022 expressing their interest in assuming the management of the Holiday Park (and ownership of its assets). Their proposal does not include ownership of the land, which would remain with Council.

12.     Since that time, Council has commissioned an independent report reviewing management and ownership options for the Holiday Park and BVL has formalised their proposal. A summary of both these documents is provided below.

 

The RSL Consultancy report

13.     RSL are a specialist consultancy for the recreation, sport and leisure sectors. They completed an independent management review of the Holiday Park in August 2023 (see Attachment 1). Whilst this report was commissioned by Council, both BVL and Council were provided an opportunity to provide information to RSL, who conducted an independent review.

14.     As part of this work, RSL reviewed the Holiday Park’s current operations, BVL’s proposal and a range of potential management models. They also considered key learnings from other councils.

15.     The RSL report recommendation was that Council should continue to operate the Holiday Park under current arrangements. Whilst the report highlighted areas where synergy between the Holiday Park and Mount Hot Pools could provide some benefits, the risks and losses to the community outweighed these benefits and there was no pressing need from a community standpoint to transfer the assets and management.

16.     The report also recommended that Council continue with already planned enhancements, including increasing the number of cabins onsite, and that Council and BVL work together to explore enhancements to improve the overall experience of both Holiday Park and Mount Hot Pools users.

17.     Some of the key observations from the RSL report are as follows:

·    Many of the benefits proposed by BVL can be achieved by an ‘in-house’ model.

·    There is less reputational risk to Council if the Holiday Park is retained in-house.

·    Any change to the Holiday Park ownership and management will have implications for the relationship Council has with the Mauao Trust, and iwi and hapū, and this would need to be carefully considered and managed.

·    Retaining the Holiday Park in-house aligns with other recent Council changes, such as bringing park maintenance operations back in-house.

The Bay Venues Ltd proposal

18.     Council received an official proposal from BVL to transfer the assets and management of the park in October 2023. The BVL report was completed following the RSL report, and it is the belief of BVL that it responds to the issues raised by the RSL report. The proposal recommends this transfer occurs on 1 July 2024 and is based on achieving the following benefits:

(a)     Increased development opportunities, including better integration of the Holiday Park with the Mount Hot Pools and resulting improvement in customer experience.

(b)     Improved cultural opportunities and partnership with mana whenua.

(c)     Opportunities to grow revenue through operating efficiencies, lower overheads, and a greater range of facilities.

19.     Revenue growth opportunities referenced in the report included providing integrated pricing options between the Holiday Park and the Mount Hot Pools, benchmarking pricing (and lifting as appropriate), developing a food and beverage option (possibly as a modular café) and providing retail on-site.

20.     BVL have acknowledged the risks raised in the RSL report and believe they have been addressed in the latest version of their proposal.

21.     Whilst cultural opportunities were referenced, there has been no engagement with mana whenua.

22.     The financial considerations of the BVL proposal are discussed in more detail later in this report.

Tangata Whenua considerations

23.     The Holiday Park is adjacent to Mauao Historic Reserve. Council’s Reserve Management Plan states:

Mauao is acknowledged as a taonga of immeasurable value which symbolises the endurance, strength and identity of local iwi. For them, Mauao is a link between both the metaphysical and physical worlds, and between the past, present and the future.

24.     Mauao historic reserve is owned by Ngāi Te Rangi, Ngāti Ranginui and Ngāti Pūkenga in the form of the Mauao Trust. The reserve is managed jointly by the Mauao Trust and Tauranga City Council under the direction of the Ngā Poutiriao ō Mauao (Mauao Joint Administration Board).

25.     The relationship between Council and the Mauao Trust is a significant and valued one. Council and the Trust work together on achieving the goals and actions of the Mauao Historic Reserve Management Plan 2018. Council are also represented on the Trust board itself via the Commissioners, and work is resourced through a ranger employed by Council. These staff relationships are an important mechanism for how Council work with and respect the Mauao Trust, iwi and the sacred tupuna maunga itself.

26.     The Holiday Park pays $330,000 annually (from 1 July 2021) to the Council Spaces and Places team towards ongoing restoration projects on Mauao and surrounding areas. BVL’s proposal allows for this to continue.

27.     The Holiday Park is not part of the historic reserve but is adjacent to it. BVL’s proposal does not have a direct impact on the historic reserve, but it is established practice to engage with tangata whenua on any issue that may affect Mauao. Given its close proximity to Mauao, Council regularly engages with tangata whenua regarding Holiday Park works and improvements.

28.     Tangata whenua have been advised of the proposal. Due to short timeframes, there has not been an opportunity to receive and consider feedback.

29.     BVL state in their proposal that they have a strong track record of working with mana whenua on previous projects, including at the Mount Hot Pools.

30.     There have also been conversations with iwi and hapū about the Holiday Park and Mauao initiatives. The site of the Holiday Park is within the rohe of hapu Ngāi Tūkairangi (who have an MoU with Council regarding this area) and Ngāti Kuku, and they have interests in this area which are additional to those of the Mauao Trust.

31.     Additionally, if there was to be a change in the management of the Holiday Park it would necessitate changes to the relationship between Council and the Mauao Trust.

Financial and economic considerations

32.     The Holiday Park has a current book value of 23.6m, with the land value component being $18.9m. At the end of June 2023, there was debt of $3.7m associated with the Holiday Park assets (excluding land).  A transfer of assets and operations of the Holiday Park should demonstrate value for money and provide benefits to ratepayers and the wider community. If a transfer is to proceed, these details will be considered and addressed in any deal agreed between Council and BVL.

Financial

33.     The Holiday Park currently is a revenue generating asset for Council. Although annual profits have fluctuated in recent years, the Holiday Park is budgeted to generate a cash surplus of $210k/annum on average over the first three years of the draft 2024-34 LTP. Transfer of the Park’s assets and operation would form part of BVL’s non-funded network, and any operating surplus would result in a reduction of the operating grant paid by TCC to BVL. As this surplus currently goes against debt reduction, this change would result in a direct rates saving to TCC. It would however, be offset by an increase in rates funding required to absorb TCC allocated overheads.

34.     A significant proportion of the holiday park tourists are domestic, particularly tourists from Auckland. The Covid lockdowns, especially the prolonged lockdowns in Auckland during 2021 have had a significant impact on visitor numbers.

35.     Operating expenditure at the holiday park has increased by 66% between 2019 and 2023. The largest cost increases have occurred due to:

·    Depreciation of 160%

·    Repairs and maintenance costs of 188%

·    Other operating expenses, such as rates, water, electricity of 86%

·    Employee expenses of 52% and internal allocations 54% (HR, finance etc)

36.     Council has proposed increases to user fees and charges at the Holiday Park as part of 2024/25 Draft Fees and Charges. A strategic review of the costs associated was completed and resulted in some increases above the rate of inflation to cover the operational expenses and fund capital improvements. This is currently being consulted on as part of the 2024-34 Long Term Plan.

37.     BVL anticipate investing $2.8m into the Holiday Park in the next five years.   Any future investment in infrastructure will require resource consent and iwi approval.

38.     BVL’s proposal is based on delivering a more commercial model to the Holiday Park, including improved synergies with the Mount Hot Pools.

39.     There is already a form of integrated pricing, with holiday park visitors receiving discounted entrance to the Mount Hot Pools (half price entry).

40.     BVL have identified a range of revenue growth opportunities as part of their proposal:

·    Integrated pricing options providing a better customer offering

·    Benchmark pricing against comparable facilities around the country

·    Develop a food and beverage offer

·    Consider providing a limited convenience/merchandise retail offer on-site.

·    Provide activation opportunities to create a more fun environment for children and youth to enjoy.

·    Continue to add improved accommodation options.

·    Phase out long term, low yield site deals currently in place

·    Leverage current collaborative relationship with Tourism Bay of Plenty to investigate branding the Holiday Park under a national brand (e.g., Top 10 Holiday Parks).

41.     BVL have indicated that there is an intention to continue to contribute $330k per year to Council’s Spaces and Places team for ongoing improvements to Mauao should they take over operation of the Holiday Park and have included this in financial assumptions. However, there would need to be further consideration given to how this amount may increase in future years and mechanisms to allow for increases and the impact of grant funding.

42.     Any capital investment required will compete with other council capital investments.

Funding and Financing Expectations

43.     If the decision is made to transfer the Holiday Park to BVL, budget adjustments will be made to the draft 2024-34 LTP as part of the deliberations process.

44.     Council’s Revenue and Financing Policy sets out the key funding principles, including accessibility, affordability and benefit to the user. The rationale being that user fees and charges are set at an appropriate level to promote the sustainable use of facilities, as well as provide access to a diverse range of events and recreational experiences for residents and economic benefits from visitors.

45.     Funding and financing arrangements between Council and BVL are outlined in the Enduring Statement of Expectations for BayVenues. Currently, BVL receives the following funding from Council:

·    Operating grant

·    Renewals funding

·    New capital funding

·    Loan interest funding

46.     There are planned works at the holiday park, and a current capital programme budget of $3.591m for the next ten years in the draft 2024-34 Long-Term Plan. Transferring the assets to BVL management would impact the funding BVL receives from Council.

·    The operating grant is likely to decrease (by the amount of surplus generated).

·    Renewals funding would increase to reflect the Holiday Park’s asset renewal programme.

47.     Currently, Council does not have to pay tax on profits made at the Holiday Park as it is a council owned and operated venue. This is not applicable to revenue generated by a CCO. If assets and operations were transferred to BVL, this would no longer apply and BVL would be responsible for tax. Any surplus is expected to be able to be managed through grant amounts and tax losses.

48.     A transfer of management of the Holiday Park would see Council lose benefit of overhead allocations. BVL has acknowledged this within the proposal and noted that overheads are lower for BVL in comparison to Council.  However, Council overheads would not decrease following the transfer.

Economic

49.     There are wider economic considerations relating to a potential transfer of facilities and operations of the Holiday Park to BVL. These are both quantifiable and non-quantifiable and speak to the range of economic interests within the community.

50.     The user experience at both the Holiday Park and Mount Hot Pools is likely to change. These changes may deliver a more customer-focused experience with a wider variety of options, but it will also represent a change that not all visitors or Tauranga residents support. The total benefit of these changes is not fully clear.

51.     It is likely that fees and charges will rise more highly for campground users, given BVL’s stated intention to benchmark these to offset rising costs and greater ability to raise prices. Benchmarking to similar facilities was one of the considerations when assessing user fees and charges in 2023/24 by Council, so this work has already been undertaken. Further fees and charges rises in the short-term present reputational risks for both Council and BVL.

52.     There are potential impacts on the wider economic and commercial relationships with local retailers. A central focus of BVL’s proposal is to increase food and beverage offerings. This is likely to have an impact on surrounding businesses, although the extent is unclear. The area surrounding the Holiday Park and Mount Hot Pools already has many cafés and eateries, with this area arguably already being at saturation point for these services. Council’s policy ‘Commercial Activities in Council Facilities’ requires Council to consider competitive issues, including whether a private sector provider in the marketplace able to deliver the required service. Council policy does not apply to BVL activities.

53.     Providing an on-site café in competition to existing businesses presents a reputational risk for both Council and BVL. This risk is acknowledged by BVL in their proposal and is intended to be mitigated through ongoing relationship building by BVL with local businesses.

54.     The Holiday Park provides indirect benefits to the community through economic activity generated in the area. The impact of a change in operations at the Holiday Park on the wider community has not been investigated, so should be considered both a risk and opportunity. Until this analysis is completed, potential outcomes are unknown.

Other key matters

55.     Mauao holds special significance for many of the city’s residents and is highly valued for its natural beauty and iconic status. The Holiday Park’s location, directly at the base of Mauao, connects it to the maunga in a unique way. It is unclear if further development or intensification of the Holiday Park is supported by the wider community, and if increased commercial activation at the base of Mauao is desired.

56.     Given the historic and cultural significance of Mauao and surrounding areas, it is possible that there will be archaeological considerations as part of any significant redevelopments that would occur as part of BVL’s planned redevelopment. It is unclear if this is an issue that has been considered, and what impact it may have in terms of feasibility, timings and costs of new projects on the site.

57.     The transfer of assets and management will require a suitable change management process for staff at the Holiday Park.

58.     Finally, the Holiday Park has already been undertaking planned improvements over recent years, with more scheduled to come. This has included work to transfer low value sites to higher value propositions, including increasing the number of cabins onsite. There are currently two cabins scheduled for the site, awaiting resource consent (which has not been granted to-date). BVL’s proposal also states their intention to improve accommodation options and phase out long-term low yield site deals. However, as stated above, this work is already being undertaken by Council, and can continue to be progressed regardless of which entity manages the Holiday Park.

Options Analysis

59.     The potential transfer of the management of the Holiday Park from Council to BVL is a significant decision and options must be carefully analysed.

60.     The cost-effectiveness of each potential option must be considered, especially in relation to the required funding, governance and delivery of the service to best meet the needs of the community. Decision makers must be satisfied that any potential change will result in a positive outcome in these three areas.

61.     There are two potential options to be considered.

62.     Option 1 – Transfer the assets and management of the Mount Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park to Bay Venues Ltd, effective 1 July 2024, subject to financial due diligence and noting that ownership of the land remains with Council. Approves the inclusion of updated financials based on this decision in the LTP deliberations process.

Positives

Negatives

·   Potential benefits of BVL operating both the Holiday Park and Mount Hot Pools can be realised.

·   May provide rates savings for Council, as the Holiday Park’s operating surplus would decrease the grant funding provided by Council to BVL.

·   Commercial Board oversight of operations

·   An enhanced ability to make commercial decisions with a separation from Council

·   Current risks and benefits are not fully understood and may only become apparent after a transfer of assets and management.

·   Does not reflect the recommendations of the RSL report.

·   Any investment required to unlock return will compete with Council investment in other areas.

·   Rates increases required to absorb Council allocated overheads (these would be offset by potential rates savings, if achieved).

·   The view of tangata whenua on the proposal are unknown.

 

63.     Option 2 – Management of the Mt Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park to be undertaken directly by Tauranga City Council (status quo):

Positives

Negatives

·   Best reflects the recommendations of the RSL review.

 

·   Potential missed opportunity to develop the Holiday Park as part of a combined facility with the Mount Hot Pools.

 

Legal Implications / Risks

Section 17a, Local Government Act 2002

64.     Local governments are required to regularly review the effectiveness of their service delivery, as per section 17a of the Local Government Act 2002. A review must consider options for the governance, funding and delivery of the service, including potential for delivery by either the local authority, a council-controlled organisation or another local authority, person or agency.

65.     The RSL report considers these factors and delivery options. Its recommendation was that Council retains the ownership and management of the Holiday Park.

Section 77, Local Government Act

66.     This section of the Local Government Act sets out Council’s requirements in relation to decision-making. Specifically, it states:

(1)   A local authority must, in the course of the decision-making process,—

(b)     seek to identify all reasonably practicable options for the achievement of the objective of a decision; and

(c)     assess the options in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

(d)     if any of the options identified under paragraph (a) involves a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water, take into account the relationship of Māori and their culture and traditions with their ancestral land, water, sites, waahi tapu, valued flora and fauna, and other taonga.

Iwi and hapū relationship protocols

67.     Council has iwi and hapū relationship protocols in place to guide its interactions with tangata whenua. These protocols set out Council’s commitment to work with iwi and hapū in accordance with the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi and identify geographical areas of importance.

68.     Ngāi Tūkairangi, Ngāti Kuku and Ngāi Te Rangi all identify Mauao and Mount Maunganui as sites of significance. Proceeding to make a decision on BVL’s proposal without consulting with iwi and hapū risks compromising these agreed upon relationship protocols.

Consultation / Engagement

69.     No engagement has previously been undertaken on this proposal. Public views are unclear.

70.     Engagement with tangata whenua has not occurred. Tangata whenua have been advised of the BVL proposal but have not been provided with adequate time to provide their feedback.

71.     Holiday Park staff have been informed that Council has received a proposal but no formal engagement has been undertaken. It is likely that any change from the status quo will cause unease amongst staff who will have concerns about what impact it may have on their employment. The BVL proposal states the existing staff will be retained.

Significance

72.     The Local Government Act 2002 requires an assessment of the significance of matters, issues, proposals and decisions in this report against Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.  Council acknowledges that in some instances a matter, issue, proposal or decision may have a high degree of importance to individuals, groups, or agencies affected by the report.

73.     In making this assessment, consideration has been given to the likely impact, and likely consequences for:

(a)   the current and future social, economic, environmental, or cultural well-being of the district or region

(b)   any persons who are likely to be particularly affected by, or interested in, the matter.

(c)   the capacity of the local authority to perform its role, and the financial and other costs of doing so.

74.     In accordance with the considerations above, criteria and thresholds in the policy, it is considered that the matter is of medium significance.

ENGAGEMENT

75.     The assessment of medium significance, together with Council’s policies, legislation, iwi and hapū protocols and the significance of Mauao and its surrounds, indicate that consultation should occur prior to a decision.

Next Steps

Option 1

76.     If Option 1 is progressed, the following next steps are required:

(a)     Advise BVL of decision to proceed with a transfer.

(b)     Undertake required financial due diligence.

(c)     Engage in further discussions with Ngāi Tūkairangi, Ngāti Kuku and Ngāi Te Rangi, and the Mauao Trust.

(d)     Report back to Council with the results of the financial due diligence and engagement with Ngāi Tūkairangi, Ngāti Kuku and Ngāi Te Rangi, and the Mauao Trust.

Option 2

77.     If Option 2 is progressed, the following next steps are required:

(a)     Advise BVL of decision not to proceed with a transfer

Attachments

1.       RSL Report - Mt Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park Review - A15361311  

 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 






















































 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

11.9       Executive Report

File Number:           A15262211

Author:                    Nic Johansson, General Manager: Infrastructure

Barbara Dempsey, General Manager: Community Services

Paul Davidson, Chief Financial Officer

Christine Jones, General Manager: Strategy, Growth & Governance

Alastair McNeil, General Manager: Corporate Services

Sarah Omundsen, General Manager: Regulatory and Compliance

Gareth Wallis, General Manager: City Development & Partnerships

Authoriser:              Marty Grenfell, Chief Executive

 

Purpose of the Report

1.      To provide updates on key projects and activities.

 

Recommendations

That the Council:

(a)     Receives the "Executive Report".

 

 

Infrastructure

Sustainability & Waste 

2.       Te Maunga Redevelopment Project

After putting the Te Maunga Redevelopment Project on hold in August, TCC has undertaken a Sub-regional Circular Economy Project to identify opportunities to transition our city towards a circular economy; and a BOP Regional Waste Infrastructure Analysis aimed at determining the waste infrastructure needs for the greater sub-region.

3.       These studies highlight the need for a well-functioning waste infrastructure network to support and enable population growth in the Bay of Plenty. Councils across the region have invested in waste services such as kerbside collection, but infrastructure requirements have largely been overlooked. The main findings of the two studies were as follows:

a)   Construction & Demolition Waste Solutions – the studies highlighted the high risk associated with cheaper disposal options, and competition for feedstock and end markets for sorted C&D waste. There is a clear need to establish a location/facility where reusable materials and items can be stored and resold.

b)   Cleanfill – is a cheaper option for disposal of C&D waste and the establishment of cleanfill alternatives in the area is likely imminent.

c)   The need for a Circular Resource Network - There is an opportunity to create a Circular Resource Network that consists of a Resource Recovery Park (RRP)/Circular Resource Network ‘Hub’. This is a centrally-located ‘hub’ that includes drop-off, bulking, storage, sorting, repairing, resale, some processing, and education with a network of consolidation points feeding into the ‘Hub’. Te Maunga has been identified as an ideal Circular Resource Network ‘Hub’.

d)   Organic Waste Processing Facility - A local (ideally regional) organic processing facility is essential for the processing of food and garden waste.

e)   Second Transfer Station – In order to support growth within the sub-region, a second transfer station is essential, to handle items that cannot be disposed of through kerbside services.

f)    Material Recycling Facility - There is potential for a regional Material Recycling Facility (MRF) that services the broader region.

g)   Regional Waste Strategy and Support - The region requires a refreshed Regional Waste Strategy and the establishment of a BOP Regional Strategic Waste role.

4.       Based on the above, it is evident that for TCC to meet the expectations of the local community and meet the goals and actions in TCC’s Environment Strategy, Waste Management and Minimisation Plan and Climate Action Investment Plan, the following three significant issues need to be resolved.

a)   The ideal use of and development at Te Maunga Transfer Station – how Te Maunga can be transformed into a Circular Resource Network ‘Hub’.

b)   The location for a local organic waste processing facility – whether a site at Te Maunga is suitable, given legal and regulatory constraints, as opposed to identifying a different site.

c)   A sub-regional transfer station to support population growth will require an in-depth business case to determine location, cost, and volumes of waste before funding can be made available through the next LTP. This includes assessing options to upgrade Maleme Street, which already has the necessary waste designation but has flooding issues and requires a stormwater treatment system.

5.       Work to resolve the above matters is underway, along with the identification of potential funding and co-investment opportunities. This includes potentially reallocating approved capex from the 2023/24 Annual Plan and draft 2024-34 LTP into later years. A paper setting-out preferred options will be presented to Council on 12 February.

6.       Planning – Te Maunga Construction and Development (C&D) business case

A workshop involving Bay of Plenty councils took place on 20 October. The workshop discussed key findings and opportunities from the Regional Waste Infrastructure Analysis designed to inform the Te Maunga C&D business case. 

7.       Key discussion points and findings included: 

·        A private waste company’s plans to establish a C&D waste collection service in Tauranga, including a C&D-specific transfer station and processing plant near Ngaruawahia. 

·        A second transfer station is needed in the west of the sub-region to cater for the growing population and the disposal of large, non-kerbside items. It is recommended that this be jointly-owned and operated by TCC and Western Bay of Plenty District Council. 

·        A regional organic processing facility is required for food and garden waste, potentially near Te Puke or further east, due to land availability and cost considerations. 

·        There is potential for a jointly-owned and operated regional Material Recycling Facility involving all BOP councils and, potentially, South Waikato councils. 

·        A Regional Circular Resource Network is proposed, with a primary Resource Recovery Park at Te Maunga, complemented by smaller resource recovery centres throughout the region. 

·        Immediate maintenance and improvements at the Te Maunga Transfer Station are required. 

·        Engagement to be prioritised with waste service providers regarding feasibility assessments and collaboration opportunities. 

Asset Services 

8.       Underway – Community engagement on slope hazard zones 

In early October, we sent 11,000 letters to property owners with slope hazard zones on their properties. The slope hazard zone maps identify different zones based on slope angle and height (2:1 failure zone, 3:1 regression zone and 4:1 runout zone). For most properties, this is an update of maps we have had since 2002. These zones are used in TCC’s building consent and planning processes and the property information is included in LIMs. Four public drop-in sessions were held in November, with more than 485 residents attending. More than 100 follow-up inquiries were created at the drop-in sessions for various teams across Council. The inquiry subjects varied, with about a quarter of the requests seeking site-specific reassessments.  Other themes included inquiries on flood mapping, vegetation and retaining walls and why information was shown on cross-leases and unit titles.  Concerns raised also included impacts on insurance and property values.

Transport 

9.       Planning – Park and Ride Trial – Tara Road

Approval to proceed with the implementation of a Park and Ride Trial at Tara Road was provided at the Council meeting on 4 September. Based on this approval, we planned to complete land purchase and design, to enable construction in the 2023/2024 summer, with the intent that the community would be able to use this facility from mid-2024.   

10.     In conjunction with the above, funding was sought from the Bay of Plenty Regional Council for an express bus service, to enhance the outcomes for facility and potential commuters. However, Regional Council funding was not committed for FY23/24 by, with a decision to be subject to the outcome of a business case and LTP processes. 

11.     The Waka Kotahi Business Case for the implementation of a Park and Ride trial at Tara Road is now progressing, with LTP funding being sought by BoPRC for the express bus service.   

12.     Based on the revised timeline, if funding is committed, we are forecasting a February 2025 opening date.  

13.     Planning – Cameron Road – Stage 2 

Engagement on the concept design has been completed.  We had 120 people attend in-person engagement events, with 245 surveys completed.  Virtual Room viewing figures (12 October – 16 November 2023) were 595 (563 new users).  Website statistics for 13 October to 12 November recorded 728 pageviews of the early design page, with and average session duration of 4minutes 19 seconds.  621 visitors were referred from the CRS2 page and Korero Mai newsletter (489 users, 91 new users).  

14.     Key feedback concerns related to disruption during construction and loss of parking for small businesses, around schools and at the hospital.  There was general acceptance that there was a need for change, with diverse views on how this should be achieved. 

15.     The business case is to be tabled at this meeting, with Waka Kotahi approval sought in March 2024.  The detailed design phase will take into account community engagement, partner and stakeholder feedback.

16.     Interim Speed Management Plan Progress

TCC is developing an interim Speed Management Plan (SMP) to meet central Government legislative requirements and contribute to a safer environment outside schools. The goal of the Interim Speed Management Plan is to support safe speeds around schools and other highly-used, active-mode areas.

17.     The interim SMP will aim to meet the target of implementing a speed zone at 40% of schools by 30 June 2024 and 100% of schools by 31 December 2027.

18.     The proposed programme involves:

·        Engaging with Schools and Marae on the proposed changes, prior to public engagement, in the first quarter of 2024.

·        Once public engagement is complete, preparation of a report on the speed management plan for Council consideration (expected in March 2024), prior to implementation.

·        Implementation of currently-funded physical works is scheduled to occur in May/June 2024, to ensure alignment with the Setting of Speed Limits Rule 2022.

19.     While the Interim Speed Management Plan aims to meet Government legislative requirements, we are mindful that enforcement is unlikely and it is therefore essential that the plan is accepted by the wider community. To achieve that, we are focusing on areas most likely to be received positively, while minimising the impact for motorists.

20.     The key focus areas are:

·        30km/h speed limits outside schools. This would involve variable 30km/h restrictions on most roads outside schools, but some local streets may need to have a permanent 30km/h zone, due to the likelihood that they will be used be used by children outside of school hours, and the expense of variable signage technology. Note that the Setting of Speed Limits Rule 2022 requires the implementation of 30km/h speed zones at 40% of schools by 30 June 2024 and 100% by 31 December 2027.

·        30km/h speed zones outside Marae, either static or variable, depending on Marae preference. Engagement with Marae will occur, with these speed restrictions being implemented upon request.

·        A permanent 30km/h zone within the Tauranga City CBD. This would apply from Second Avenue to Mission Street, east of Cameron Road.

·        A variable 30km/h restriction on Cameron Road, between Hamilton Street and Brown Street, to be activated when Tauranga and Wharepai Domains are in use for events.

21.     Targeting schools and marae would address areas where there are high numbers of particularly vulnerable pedestrians. In addition, a number of other benefits would result from targeting these areas first:

a)    The last set of speed limit changes showed that school limits are widely supported in the community and help with our TravelSafe relationships.

b)    We have a social license to roll these out without significant education and engagement programmes.

c)    School zones address the highest area of focus for Government and one of the highest areas of risk for us.

d)    By enabling safer active travel to school, we support travel behaviour change from a young age, which aligns with TSP/UFTI priorities for mode shift. Any behaviour change also helps to address congestion pinch-points across the network.

22.     Travel Safe 

Sixty-one young people with Learners or Restricted licences attended the TCC Travel Safe Young Driver workshops at Pāpāmoa and Bethlehem over the recent school holidays. The workshop key learning focuses are: 

·        Restraints, Impairment, Distraction and Speed (RIDS); Safe vehicles on the road, and maintenance checks. 

·        Sharing the road with vulnerable road users and heavy vehicles. 

·        A practical driving lesson with an instructor. 

·        Understanding car safety ratings, and what to look for when buying a car.  

23.     The workshops were supported by Waka Kotahi, Fulton Hogan and local driving instructors.   

24.     Feedback received from parents of the October workshop: 

·        "My son and I attended the workshop yesterday. Thank you so much for providing such an informative day.  We both got a lot from the day, and I agree, it is very beneficial for the parents to attend with the teens. Invaluable to hear the driving instructor’s feedback. Well done to you and the team for arranging a wonderful day". 😊 - Liz  

·        “I would like to say how impressed I was with the content and professionalism of all those involved today! It was very educational and well delivered to the target audience! We are extremely grateful for the opportunity to partake in this course. Subsequently… Sam has checked our tyre pressures and is mindful of heavy vehicles and other road users! A direct result from his learning today! Also of note, he now understands the horrific statistics of young male drivers and doesn’t want to be a part of the skids group or mentality! Once again, so many thanks for allowing us to be part of this experience!”  

25.     Transport Contract and Network Management team  

A Cambridge Road slip occurred in May 2023 during a heavy rain event, following a long-wet period. The slip area was within both TCC Local Road and the TNL project site. Due to the slip's nature and location, a wall is being built involving both TCC and Waka Kotahi land parcels. 

26.     Works commenced on 26 September, with the aim of finishing in 10 weeks. The critical timing for completing this project prior to Christmas 2023 is due to the upcoming closure of Cambridge Road in January 2024 to allow the TNL project to construct a new underpass under Cambridge Road. The scope of the works included construction of a new retaining wall, kerb and channel, stormwater drainage improvements and pavement reinstatement. 

27.     The project is on-track to be completed in early-December. 

28.     The photos date from the start of contract in September, with progress as at 20 November.  

A large hole in the ground

Description automatically generated    A construction site with a large concrete wall

Description automatically generated

29.     Transport Network Operations has successfully tendered a new streetlight maintenance and renewals contract for local roads and state highways in the Tauranga region. The TC275-23 contract was awarded to the incumbent contractor, Mckay Ltd, for $9,606,714. The contract period is for five years (3 +1+1). The successful tender was below the engineer’s estimate and the wide range of prices received shows a healthy tendering market. The contract is expected to come into force on 1 February.

Waters 

30.     Te Maunga wastewater plant – Marine Outfall – ROV awards 

The project undertaken to clear debris from the outfall pipeline using a remotely-operated vehicle received two awards at the October 2023 Water NZ Conference, winning the Best Project Award & Health and Safety Innovation categories. 

31.     Wastewater pipework on Birch Ave 

The renewal of an 80m length of wastewater pipework on Birch Avenue in Judea is nearing completion. The works were carried out via micro tunnelling in place, rather than the traditional open-cut method. This meant a smaller site set-up, which allowed us to keep traffic flowing in both directions throughout the works, reducing the disruption to the many businesses in the area. It also meant reduced damage to the existing road and likely a reduction in carbon emissions due to the reduced excavation required. 

 

 

Diagram of a diagram of a pipe cutting

Description automatically generated

Community Services

The items below are listed under the most relevant community outcome, although many do contribute to the other outcomes.

Tauranga Mataraunui – An inclusive city

32.     The Pasifika in the Bay Festival is always a highlight of the year, with Tauranga City Libraries attending the last four festivals. The festival is a great chance to engage with our community and show all the resources available in our local libraries. We also had an opportunity to show  the plan for Te Manawataki o Te Papa and get word out about these exciting new developments.   

 

33.     The libraries have restarted regular visits to the Merivale Community Centre after-school programme, providing the children with links to the library and fun enrichments sessions. Our Kaikōkiri Kaupapa Māori are developing further sessions with the centre to offer a regular kaupapa Māori-based programme.

34.     Te Ao Mārama Tauranga City Library ran three afterhours wellbeing workshops in November - A Family Journey to Plant-Based Living; Conscious Connected Breathing; and Time is not Toxic. These free sessions had good uptake.

35.     Currently on display in He Puna Manawa is Te Tohu Whakamaharatanga mō Te Tohu Whakatū Wāhine 1993 – 2023, a collection of 16 historically significant tukutuku panels. The exhibition launched with an evening event, including a panel discussion hosted by Amie Rolleston, Matanga Taonga Tuku Iho Maori.

The tukutuku collection was crafted by the Matua branch of the Māori Women’s Welfare League and was gifted to Tauranga Library in 1993 to share cultural narratives with the community.   Their initial unveiling in July 1993 was timed to celebrate the Women’s Suffrage Centennial in Aotearoa New Zealand.

This is the first time in 27 years that the collection has been brought together in one place.  Read more about the collection on Pae Koroki.

36.     The Diversity and Culture Advisor is starting work on refreshing our Welcoming Plan (currently 2018 – 2023) for next year. We will work closely with our Welcoming Communities Steering Group, which includes membership from Priority One, Toi Kai Rawa, the Ministry for Ethnic Communities, the Pacific Island Community Trust BOP, NZ Police and Western Bay of Plenty District Council. Community engagement will take place early next year, with the aim being to have the plan adopted in mid-2024.

37.     On 16 November, our Diversity and Culture Advisor held a successful Multi-Ethnic Forum, with migrant/multicultural communities attending. The focus of the forum was water safety and community safety, with support provided by Emergency Management BOP, NZ Police, Council’s City Safety Engagement Advisor and Global Swim.  The forum is held quarterly, with average attendance of 40-50 people from a range of cultural backgrounds. The goals of the forum are to support a more connected sector, collaboration, connect communities with resources and information, and have a stronger ethnic voice heard in the Tauranga community.

A group of people standing in a room

Description automatically generated

38.     Our Senior Advisor – Emergency Management and Advisor – Community Resilience recently attended a 3-day Geosciences Conference in Wellington, hosted by the Geoscience Society of NZ. The conference covered a range of topics, including tsunami studies and volcanology as well as several research presentations from NZ and international students. They will look to incorporate some of the learnings from the conference in their planning around hazard management and community engagement.

39.     The Contact Centre has been commended by ALGIM for being in the top 10 for Best Customer Experience nationally. The team is very proud to have received this outstanding service award.

40.     The first graduation for the Pike Ake Cadet programme for unemployed youth took place during November, with three cadets successfully completing the 12-month programme. All three have secured permanent jobs, either within Council or externally. Whanau and friends came along to share in the celebration and talk about the significant impact the programme had had on them and their whanau.  

41.     The installation of a set of new cricket nets has been completed at Waipuna Reserve in time for the summer season. Installation of the nets is part of an ongoing investment in sporting facilities across Tauranga.

 

42.     The design of a new netball shelter at Gordon Spratt Reserve has been confirmed. This is a prefabricated building which is being manufactured offsite for installation at the reserve.  Installation is anticipated late-January.

A drawing of a building

Description automatically generated

43.     The Tauranga Heritage Collection received more exposure during Pasifika in the Bay, via a stand showcasing objects with connections to the Pacific.

44.     We were fortunate to have two kaumatua groups from Pirirakau and Ngai Te Rangi visit the museum collection. Both groups provided strong support for the museum development, to showcase our local history and cultural artifacts. Also conveyed was the importance of a museum as a platform for community events, educational programmes and exhibitions that celebrate the diverse heritage of the region.

A group of people posing for a photo

Description automatically generated

45.     Baycourt was a primary venue for the biennial Tauranga Arts Festival, providing support to the Arts Festival Trust. Over the 10-day festival period, Baycourt facilitated three mihi whakatau to welcome performers, crew, and creatives to Tauranga. This endeavour not only aligned with the festival Kaupapa, but also exemplified our commitment to manaakitanga, a core value of Tauranga City Council.

46.     The Event Facilitation team successfully managed 66 events and bookings on public open space in the first quarter of the 2023/24 year. This number is comparable with the 2022/23 first quarter. We are seeing a continuing increase in filming activity, with seven filming activities facilitated in our public open spaces, two more than in the first quarter of 2022. The team is working on several inquiries from film industry participants who are looking to do film projects in the coming year.

47.     The Classic by HoopNation, a premier basketball event in New Zealand since 2017, attracted 7,000 attendees to Tauranga from New Zealand and Australia. Funded by Council and held at various venues over the Labour Day weekend, the event was attended by 1,300 athletes from 191 teams. Also included was a visit by local Whai basketball players to Merivale School. This outreach engaged Year 4-6 students in a morning of basketball action, leaving students and players with lasting memories.

48.     The Historic Village hosted the Diwali Festival of Lights on 28 October, drawing 2,500 community members to the Village Green, which was near capacity. The event's vibrant atmosphere, coupled with thematic decorations, highlighted The Historic Village as a unique venue for organising local events in Tauranga Moana.

 

49.     Over the summer months (December to March), Council will facilitate 54 large events with expected attendances of over 500, and an additional 44 City Centre Activations of outdoor cinema, live music, yoga and pilates. There will also be markets and private events which are not held on public open space.

50.     A new map has been installed at the entrance to the Village to help visitor wayfinding and tell the story of The Historic Village. The features all Village buildings and features watertight perspex boxes and poster lockers offering printed maps for visitors to take.

A sign with a map on it

Description automatically generated

51.     International Day of Disabled Persons on 3 December

The incredible talents within our local disability community were highlighted at this year's celebration of the International Day of Disabled Persons on 3 December. Taking place at Hopukiore (Mount Drury) Reserve, we showcased Tauranga’s vibrant disability community at a free, fun-filled, family-friendly day. Live performances included the main act, singer Sophie Maude, as well as dancing by Mount Dance Co, kapa haka from Idea Services, singer Hayley Little, and social circus act Circability.

We’re proud to host this event in association with our partners Parafed BOP, CCS Disability Action and Western Bay of Plenty District Council. Together, we’re working hard to champion inclusion and make Tauranga a more accessible city, where people are free to move around easily and safely, without limitations.

The Library also held a week-long series of events designed to support people living with a disability and celebrate the International Day of Disabled Persons. This included sharing all the inclusive resources we have available in the library, accessible activity enrichments, and an evening panel talk with members of the disabled community. 

Tauranga Taurikura – A city that values, protects and enhances our environment

52.     It was great to see the public enjoying the fresh sand slopes at Waikorire/Pilot Bay over the weekend. This sand, repurposed from our routine deep water dredging operations, serves a dual purpose: guaranteeing the safety of our shipping channels while contributing to the rejuvenation of beaches citywide. Rigorous quality assessments precede the deposition of this sand, ensuring its adherence to public health standards.

Tauranga - Tātai Whenua – A well planned city

53.     The Emergency Management team is looking forward to welcoming two summer interns – from Auckland and Otago Universities – to assist with our community engagement activities over summer. The summer interns both have strong connections to Tauranga and will be assisting with various task,s including community engagement, tsunami zone audits and operational reviews.

54.     Staff from across Council participated in the annual Shake Out Earthquake drill on October 19. This national exercise coordinated by The National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) reminds people of the right action to take during an earthquake - drop, cover and hold. It was great to see so many people get involved across all Council locations – even the Vessel Works and Pyes Pa Cemetery teams.

 A tractor pulling a trailer

Description automatically generated

55.     Fear Free, a company that specialises in training to de-escalate aggressive situations, delivered an engaging and thorough session for the Service Centre, Library and some Regulatory staff in October.

56.     Construction has commenced on a new deck structure Mauao at Awaiti, on the northern face of Mauao, as part of the placemaking programme of work. This work is progressing well and is expected to be completed before the end of November. This project has received a $150k funding grant from the Port of Tauranga. Visitors to Mauao this summer can expect several other features to be completed by Christmas, including sculptures, a feature seating area on the lower summit and the shaping of a natural amphitheatre near the water tank.

57.     Good progress is being made on the construction of the Destination Skate Park, with the project on track for April 2024 completion. The project team has been successful in obtaining additional external funding for construction zones 3 & 4 and completion of the design scheme.

A skate park under construction

Description automatically generated A skate park being built

Description automatically generated

58.     In the CBD, work has begun in conjunction with the City Centre team on the first of several placemaking/activation projects at Grey Street. Initial work involved the removal of the Palms in this location. Work will follow on some streetscape enhancements to give an impression of what the enhanced city centre will look like in the future.

A construction worker loading a bucket of dirt onto a road

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

59.     Building 62 at The Historic Village, known as Colonel Greer’s Cottage, has undergone an interior fitout, including new electrical circuits and lighting, completing the final phase to bring this building into use. A designated Green Room workspace features three workstations, a heat pump, Wi-Fi, radio charging stations, a wet area for wet weather gear, and comfortable amenities for event organisers hosting community festivals on the Village Green. The space is available for hire as part of The Village Green, or as a separate space if The Village Green is not in use.

A small white house with a door open

Description automatically generated

Tauranga Ara Rau – A city that we can move around easily

60.     As part of the Pāpāmoa Shared Path project, work has begun (in conjunction with the Transportation team) on the installation of raised pedestrian crossing tables to assist users to safely cross Domain Road.

61.     Construction on the Marine Parade Coastal Path is progressing, with the section from the Cenotaph to Hart Street being completed prior to Christmas. Construction of the section from Hart Street to Tweed Street will be completed in February.

A boardwalk along a beach

Description automatically generated A wooden walkway leading to a beach

Description automatically generated

Tauranga a te kura – A city that supports business and education

62.     November saw the start of the outreach initiative to Whakatipuranga teen parent school.  Library staff will visit Whakatipuranga and the students will come into a library to take part in   a creativity-based learning programme that has links to the New Zealand Curriculum. The activities will encourage participants to interact with their pēpi (babies), with kōrero to support literacy development.

63.     For those who missed ART + ARCHITECTURE: A TAURANGA ART GALLERY STORY, thanks to a collaboration between Toi Tauranga Art Gallery and the Heritage & Research Team – Tauranga City Libraries, anyone can now view the exhibition as an online timeline in Pae Korokī. Art + Architecture maps key moments of Tauranga Art Gallery’s conception and journey as a public art gallery. 

64.     Several years ago, in collaboration with the Tauranga Arts Festival, we launched ‘Glimpses’, a publication that explores the Tauranga Heritage Collection. At this year’s Arts Festival, we launched the third Glimpses publication: ‘Collecting Connections’. Eleven rangatahi were challenged to select one object that connected with them from more than 30,000 in the Heritage Collection. They were then invited to put forward an object of their own choice to be added to the collection. What emerged were individual and object-based connections that exceeded our expectations.

Museum staff with the young people who participated in the Glimpses project and some proud parents.

65.     Our Museum Educator ran a professional development session for the Art Gallery and Library educators - ‘Aotearoa Histories 101 and Te Tiriti o Waitangi ki Tauranga’.  Some feedback we received from this session was:

“Another big ngā mihi for your wonderful workshop. Was so great to get a refresh to Aotearoa Histories and to be able to see what you are teaching in the classroom. It’s also nice to be able to create lovely working connections between our Tauranga Moana GLAM sector colleagues.”

66.     As well as training Council colleagues, the Hands-on Tauranga outreach programme delivered a variety of topics to a record 1,198 students in Term 3. As we head towards the end of the school year, the number of Tauranga City students that have or will experience a Hands-on Tauranga Outreach session in Term 4 is sitting at 1,031 students. We have had excellent feedback from these sessions this year, with many teachers rebooking.

“Just wanted to say thank you again for your visit yesterday.  The children from all 3 classes were just absolutely buzzing and so engaged.  What an awesome resource we have in Tauranga moana.” Bellevue Sep 2023.

Term 4 is generally quieter for borrowing Hands-on Tauranga objects, but we still loaned 95 objects, with another 66 used for Outreach. Feedback from a teacher that borrowed objects this term:

“My class absolutely loved having them. They have had a wonderful time exploring the old toys. Thank you. Such an amazing resource.” St Mary’s School.

67.     As part of our popular Outreach sessions, our Museum Educator took the taxidermied kiwi to a group of Year 1 students at Pillans Point School recently. These students were particularly moved by the plight of Paora the kiwi in the Miami Zoo earlier this year and wrote some fabulous stories about Paora.  

68.     Our Museum Educator was invited to take part in a segment on the Breeze Radio station recently, promoting Hands-on Tauranga and the Museum project. Objects were brought in as part of the segment and radio hosts Max and Jolene were very enthusiastic about seeing the objects and finding out more about the Hands-on Tauranga service. 

69.     Our Director of Arts, Culture and Heritage was the keynote speaker at the Priority One AGM on 8 November. His speech focused on Te Manawataki o Te Papa and the role modern museums play in liveable cities, their economic impact and the transformational role a museum has, creating opportunities for visitors to learn about themselves and about each other.  His address was warmly received by the audience,with a lot of positive comments about the new museum around the room.

70.     On 6 November 2023, Baycourt launched an exclusive ticketing partnership with Eventfinda New Zealand, following a comprehensive RFP process. The transition from the existing provider, Ticketek, will occur gradually over the next few months. This partnership is rooted in a shared commitment to prioritise the customer, ensuring a consistent, intuitive, innovative, and user-friendly ticketing experience for patrons and venue hirers.

71.     Baycourt was recently approached by Massey University to participate in a new national research project being funded by the Ministry for Culture & Heritage to measure and articulating the value of the live performance sector in Aotearoa. The main purpose of the research is to demonstrate the economic and social/wellbeing benefits of the live performance sector, in a way that speaks the Government’s language. A significant proportion of the project is dedicated to implementing a nationwide survey of event attendees from June 2023 to June 2024. At the conclusion of the research, the University will develop a free, publicly available tool which the live event sector can use to articulate the value of their events and operations to funders and Government.

Chief Financial Officer

Finance

72.     In October, the Strategy, Finance & Risk Committee approved an increase of $100m in Council’s uncommitted facility, bringing the total facility cover to $200m.  The report indicated we would increase the uncommitted facility with our current provider (ANZ).  However, it is not possible to simply increase the existing facility and we are instead looking at a separate product.  Therefore, staff will assess quotes from a number of banks, consistent with TCC procurement guidelines.

Credit implications of not separating water entities from Councils

73.     Standard & Poor’s (S & P) has reported on the implications for councils’ credit ratings and debt of the decision not to move waters responsibilities to separate large entities, as originally proposed in the waters reform.  This report - New Zealand Local Government Outlook 2024 – Bridge over Troubled Waters - notes that while the alternative reform proposals remain unclear, if debts (past and future) are merely shifted into entities that remain under the control of councils, local government credit quality may continue to erode.

74.     A graph in the S&P report reinforces the submissions made by local government that while many of the costs of infrastructure and regulation have been borne by local government, its revenue from taxation has not increased as a proportion of GDP.  Central government taxation has instead taken the increase, even though councils’ investment in areas such as three waters, roading and development of new growth areas has in large measure contributed to this GDP growth.

Council borrowing milestone

75.     Council gross borrowing in November exceeded $1b for the first time.  The 2023/24 Annual Plan budgeted a gross debt level of $1.1b by June 2024.

IFF and rates system implementation

76.    
The first IFF levy for transportation projects commences in the 2024/25 financial year.  Details of rateable properties and incorporation in TCC’s new SAP rating platform is being undertaken at the moment.

(a)     Negotiations on a potential second IFF for Te Manawataki o Te Papa are still being worked through.

77.     Rating revaluation has been undertaken by Opteon, as part of moving to a new three-yearly cycle.  From the first draft revaluations, audit identified further work to be undertaken to satisfy quality requirements.  The second version was submitted to the Office of the Valuer General (DIA) on 24 November, with feedback expected within two weeks.

Tauranga Airport

Airport Operations

78.     There were 926 flights operated by Air New Zealand during October carrying 48,495 passengers, compared to 46,823 passengers and 886 flights in October 2022.

79.     Air NZ is operating with circa 90% loadings at regional airports across the country, meaning many people wishing to travel by air are either not being able to travel at a time that suits, or are not able to travel by air at all.

80.     Air NZ has two new turbo prop ATR aircraft arriving in mid-2024, adding capacity to regional routes. Unfortunately, they have been advised that the Pratt and Witney engines on their Airbus fleet will require major off-wing maintenance. The total maintenance period will be in the order of two years, with up to four of the jets out of service at a time. On top of this, they have a maintenance issue with some of their Boeing 787 fleet, causing the pausing of services to two overseas destinations. For regional airports, this means no additional services for the next two years, as the new turbo props will be partially covering the Airbus routes. For Tauranga, there is a possibility that some of the 50-seat aircraft services could be upgraded to 72-seat aircraft.  Air NZ is working hard to get hold of some lease aircraft, but there is a worldwide at present, particularly for turboprop aircraft.

Airport Development

81.     Tauranga Airport takes over the ownership of and responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the Airport’s lighting, visual navigation aid and standby power systems on 1 December. We are the first of the regional airports to do so. This equipment is very old, in poor condition and obsolete, in that there are no longer parts available. We have commissioned ADB Safegate, a multinational provider and maintainer of this type of equipment, to do a complete rebuild of the system, which commenced two months ago.  We anticipate a switchover to the new system will be possible late-March.

82.     We have taken this as an opportunity to install state-of-the-art equipment, including only-LED lighting, with the runway edge lighting being high intensity, as used at Auckland, Queenstown and most overseas airports. This decision was made to minimise the number of missed approaches and diversions due to poor visibility, as pilots must be able to positively identify the runway environment before descending below 600 feet when approaching from the west and 300 feet from the east. Gold Coast Airport reduced diversions by 90% when it went down this track about three years.

83.     The images below show what the runway lighting looks like now, from an altitude of 1000m, and what it will look like when the new system is operating. In addition to the edge lighting improvements, we will have high intensity approach lighting and REIL’s (runway end indicator lights, or strobes) which a pilot can request to be switched on. The lighting can be operated at settings from 1% to 100%. All of this equipment will be operated remotely from Christchurch or Auckland outside othe hours of service of our Air Traffic Control team. The new system will take away any confusion with local environment lighting, such as Hewletts Rd and the Port.

 

84.     The total cost of the upgrade is $2.8m, which is budgeted for and will be paid for via user fees and charges. The cost saving to Air NZ is significant, and business travellers will also benefit from a reduction in diversion-related productivity impacts.

85.     We will be asking kaumatua Manea Ngatai from Whareroa Marae to flick the switch in March, firstly to bless the new equipment and secondly as he was part of the team that installed the current system back in 1967.

86.     Internal lining of the new fire and rescue building has started.

Strategy, Growth & Governance

Te Pou Takawaenga

87.     Te Ara Whānui Update: The Te Ara Whānui app has now exceeded 2,000 downloads and is quickly gaining popularity as a handy reference tool, both within Council and externally.

88.     Takawaenga Field Trip updates: In keeping with Working Beyond Tauranga as set out in Our Direction, Te Pou Takawaenga has taken-up several invitations to visit other councils and iwi entities in Wellington, Eastern Bay of Plenty and the Far North. In all cases, we met with the local councils, local museums and iwi-led entities focused on sharing history with their wider communities. We have shared policies and processes around iwi and hapū engagement, support of te reo and tikanga, partnership approaches to projects and maintaining integrity in interactions.

89.     In return, we have received insight into how other councils approach this and how these activities may impact iwi and hapū entities. Regarding museums and history-sharing, the key theme has been authenticity and simplicity. Each of these learnings will be analysed for transferable learnings in the advice and guidance we provide.

 

 

 

Corporate Services

Community Relations

90.     The Media Impact Score (MIS) for October was 2.1, sitting above the local government average of 2.0. The number of reports also rose to 244. Positive reporting focused on transport developments - despite frustration about parking. This was a mostly positive theme, with recognition of Council's decision to defer the parking plans. The most positive theme of the month was TCC’s and Commission Chair Tolley’s response to vandalism of te reo Māori on rubbish bins. Very negative coverage was based around poor air quality in Mt Maunganui.

91.     In October, many Community Relations team members were involved in producing content and advertising collateral for the draft Long-term Plan. The strategy has been to try and reach people who might not ordinarily engage with council, both digitally and in person. Most engagement events are in shopping centres and markets, going to where people are rather than relying on residents coming to us. We have minimised other advertising activity through the consultation period, 15 November – 15 January, so as not to detract from this important engagement activity.

Digital Services

Association of Local Government Information Managers (ALGIM) Awards

92.     The Digital Services and Customer Services teams had a very successful night at the Association of Local Government Information Managers (ALGIM) Awards on 15 November. Tauranga City Council won the following national awards:

·    ICT Professional of the Year Award - Cheryl Pome'e, Digital Security Lead

·    Most Improved Cybersecurity

·    ICT Project of the Year Award - City Beautification

·    Top 10 for Best Customer Experience Award

93.     These awards are the result of a lot of hard work by our Digital teams and strong collaboration with the wider organisation. The ICT Project of the Year award is a great example of a one-team approach, working with the City Operations team to deliver an outcome we can all be proud of.

Digital Capital Programme – Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Programme

94.     The programme has achieved another significant milestone during this reporting period with the successful go-live of a new Human Resources Information System (HRIS), SuccessFactors.  This required the migration of all our core employee data and the new core system now allows staff and managers to manage employee data, request leave, manage performance and goals and manage teams.

95.     The go-live also includes mobile capability for staff to manage timesheets, leave and their employee information directly from their mobile phone. This is especially important for our field staff who do not always have access to a laptop.

Cyber Smart Week

96.     In late-October, we organised the highly anticipated "Cyber Smart Week" event, one of the cornerstones of our annual cybersecurity initiatives that delve into a myriad of crucial cybersecurity topics. To enrich the experience, we integrated the expertise of our Privacy and Business Continuity teams, offering valuable insights to enhance the proficiency of other TCC functions.

97.     This event saw a great response from staff, creating numerous opportunities to address cybersecurity and privacy concerns while elevating the awareness of users.

ExpenseMePro

98.     ExpenseMePro, the latest expense management solution for P-Cards, has been successfully implemented to replace Fraedom for the Finance team and budget managers.

Civic Digital Infrastructure

99.     Digital Services continues to support technology required for Civic Precinct projects, including 90 Devonport Rd, the Library and Community Hub, Museum, Civic Whare and public realm spaces.  Current focus areas include:

·    90 Devonport Rd – The contract was awarded to a selected Audio-Visual supplier. We are currently working through and updating the anticipated technology delivery programme.

·    Community Hub, Civic Whare and Museum – current focus across these spaces is integrating technology briefs and concept drawings into design.

·    Waterfront and public realm spaces – Investigating opportunities to include technology in the Waterfront and Public Realm projects, including digital signage, wayfinding (from a technology perspective), digital placemaking (projections, interactive opportunities), storytelling opportunities (from a technology perspective), public wi-fi zones, and digital kiosks.

Legal, Risk & Procurement

100.   The Legal Team has been educating relevant staff on the new Business Payment Practices Act 2023 and regulations and will be supporting the business to prepare for Council’s first six-month disclosure period (1 July to 31 December next year).  This legislation imposes significant new reporting obligations on large businesses (including council) relating to payment practices - payments on invoices received/issued and paid in a reporting period.  The policy purpose behind this legislation is to provide businesses (particularly small businesses) with visibility of the payment practices of the larger businesses they deal with.

101.   The Legal team has also signed up to the NZLS Gender Equality Charter, to ensure the team and profession continue to close the gender pay gap.

102.   The Risk team, in conjunction with Digital Services, has successfully completed User Acceptance Testing of the new risk management software (Camms). A soft go-live has launched, with roll-out to the wider organisation planned to commence in the first quarter of 2024.

Procurement Drop-in Sessions

103.   The procurement team recently held drop-in sessions, giving local businesses an opportunity to meet with us to ask questions, share their work and find out more about working with Council. 

104.   The team met with over 20 businesses, most of which were locally based or had a presence in Tauranga.  Feedback from the sessions was positive with most attendees strongly agreeing they found the drop-in session useful and indicting that they would recommend the sessions to others.  Likewise, the procurement team found meeting with these businesses a valuable experience, providing an excellent opportunity to build closer relationships with our supplier base.

105.   As a result of these sessions, we have already engaged two new suppliers and passed on details and referrals for others.  There will be further sessions available in the new year.

People, Performance & Culture, Health and Safety

Health and Safety

106.   Over the last six weeks, more than 130 staff have attended workshops on Contractor Management and Risk Management processes. 

107.   There has been an increased level of incident reporting, on the back of the newly-created Damstra training module.  More than 85% of staff have completed this training and are now aware of how to load an incident/event, and what needs to be reported.  The drug and alcohol policy communication plan is being completed ahead of people leader and staff information sessions.

90 Devonport Road

108.   The transition team facilitated five workshops for people leaders to help develop a transition plan to support staff relocating to the new building.

Talent Acquisition

The team is working through 62 vacancies. We have continued to be proactive in the market, identifying excellent candidates and supporting our people leaders to fill a range of complex and long-standing vacancies. This has resulted in over half of our vacancies progressing to offer stage. Our continued drive to deliver a positive and efficient recruitment process has been supported by the changing employment market and reduced requests for resource, in conjunction with the recruiting team utilising candidate search functions such as LinkedIn.  

Turnover

109.   Unplanned turnover has fallen again, now at 12.7%, down from 13% last quarter. This is the lowest we’ve seen in the past three years, but is not unexpected given the current economic uncertainty.

Learning & Development

110.   The team has wrapped-up a big year of learning delivery with the last two cohorts of Te Huringa Tai: Our Emerging Leaders programme finishing shortly, providing capacity for the development of new programmes for 2024, including Performance Management and People Leader Induction.

Performance, Monitoring & Assurance

111.   GIS data has now been migrated to AWS (Amazon Web Service). New internal and external viewers are being built in a test environment, along with other apps. All dependencies with older virtual desktops have been removed. The go-live trial for the field safety app for parking staff has also been undertaken.

New aerial photography for Tauranga City now available for all staff.

112.   The BI team has focused on deploying a Transport Insights Portal - giving an overview of transport related information in one place, available to all staff on insider; and a dashboard giving an overview of financial performance (presented at the 4 December Strategy Finance and Risk Committee meeting). Both projects aim to increase our knowledge and visibility of data.

113.   The CPAD team has been focused on internal audits of projects and facilitating workshops to identifying the significant number of projects occurring within the city centre over the next five years.

Regulatory Compliance

Building Consents

114.   We received 206 Building Consent and Amendment applications in October, for a total of 755 for the year to date. This was a slight increase in volume compared with the past six months (an average of 184 per month for the past six months), but 6% less than last year, and 8-20% lower compared to the July-October periods for 2019 – 2022. Anecdotally, the slight increase in October is driven by increases in the requirements of Building Code Clause H1 – Energy Efficiency, which came into force on 1 November.

115.   We granted 170 consents and amendments in October, for a total of 755 YTD. The volume of consents granted is clearly also down compared with previous years, reflecting the reduced number of applications received. 13 applications were refused in October, which is higher than for previous months. By way of example, we refused a total of 37 applications in the last financial year (an average of 3 per month). This is due to a concerted effort to ensure that we only accept applications with sufficient information.

116.   The proportion of consents granted within statutory timeframes has increased slightly, with 68% of consents and amendments issued within 20 working days in October. At the time of preparing this report, November’s figures are on track to improve by 10% or more. We have implemented several small process changes, and are working on others, to help improve this further. This includes daily reporting on applications that are approaching 20 working days, seeking additional capacity from our contractor and in-house workforce, as well as the increase in refused applications referred to above.

117.   As part of this concerted effort to get applications out before day 20, we have also focused on addressing older consents which can affect timeliness tracking. For example, if you look at the consents granted in October that were received in the past three months, 85.5% of these were granted within statutory timeframes. We had 94 applications in progress that were already over day 20 at the start of October, but by mid-November, that had reduced to 51 applications.

118.   Inspection wait-times for standard (45-minute) inspections have remained low, generally around 24 hours, whereas for our most complex inspection types (for instance R3 Finals) the lead-time has pushed out slightly to a maximum of five days. Inspection numbers remain roughly 20% down on previous years, with around 400 inspections completed most weeks. Because wait-times are low, there is reduced demand for our remote and weekend inspections.

119.   We issued 135 Code Compliance Certificates (CCCs) in October, for a total of 603 YTD. In October, 42 of the CCCs issued related to the construction of new dwellings and a further two consents related to the construction of 41 independent units in aged care facilities. Our compliance with statutory timeframes has remained consistently high, with 97% being issued within 20 working days in October.

120.   Our IANZ (on behalf of MBIE) assessment took place over two weeks, from 25 September to 6 October. The outcome of this assessment has been positive, with only eight ‘non-compliances’ identified. Action plans have now been approved for all the non-compliances and implementation is well underway.

Environmental Planning

121.   237 applications for resource consents and other associated approvals have been received so far in the 2023/24 financial year to date (Q1). October saw a decline in the number of applications received per month, which is consistent with previous years’ trend of a slowdown in the lead-up to the holiday break. Overall, numbers remain slightly higher than at the same time for 2022/23.

122.   For the 2023/24 financial year to date, Council has issued decisions in relation to 306 applications. Timeframe compliance for new applications (i.e., applications received since 1 July 2023) is currently 84%. This is a great improvement on previous periods, with 75% reported in Q1 of this financial year and 72% in Q4 of last year. It also marks the highest levels of compliance since 2019/20.

123.   Implementing process improvements to improve processing timeliness and efficiency remains a focus for staff. This includes the decision to be more direct in returning applications that do not meet the sufficiency tests in the RMA, rather than providing extra time for applicants to resolve issues post-lodgement. This decision has had a noticeable effect on timeframe compliance, with returns accounting for 27% of decisions on new applications.

124.   Further, staff are continuing a dedicated project to work through historic applications, alongside those lodged in this financial year. These have significant implications on timeliness over the course of the year. Clearing this backlog will provide a much better platform for managing workload and ensuring timeliness across all applications.

125.   In the financial year to date, staff have conducted development contribution assessments for 510 building consents, totalling $ 7.4 million in contributions, and 146 resource consents totalling $3 million in contributions.

126.   Staff continue to receive a number of requests for development contributions to be deferred, generally until a Certificate of Code Compliance (CCC) is issued. The current value of deferred DC’s is $6 milliion, with the majority of agreements including requirements for interest to be payable on the deferred amount.

Environmental monitoring

127.   Staff have responded to 98 RMA incidents and 119 noise incidents in the financial year to date, with a further 130 noise complaints responded to by contractors. Council has monitored 331 resource consents in the financial year to date. The majority of RMA incidents continue to relate to over-height fencing, breaches of resource consent, or concerns around density of housing.

128.   Noise complaints most frequently relate to either noise from residential or commercial activities and construction vibration. An increase in noise complaints is normal for the summer period. Staff recently met with Police to discuss the need for assistance during noise equipment seizures, to ensure staff and contractor safety following an increase in anti-social behaviour.

129.   With the scale of works both underway and proposed to be carried out by (or on behalf of) Tauranga City Council, staff are engaging with project teams to identify potential concerns and ensure noise and vibration issues are identified and addressed appropriately.

Matters of Interest

130.   A recent application by Wolfbrook for a housing development on Ridge St, Otumoetai, has drawn significant interest from local residents, with concerns being raised in relation to density and character. Although a decision is yet to be made in relation to notification, staff are now proactively engaging with the community, to keep them up-to-date on the process.

131.   A number of parties, including hapu and representatives of several active community groups, have joined the Allied Asphalt hearing process for regional and district council consents (to be heard by the Environment Court via direct referral). The next step will be a judicial conference where the Court will question the parties on their case, expert evidence and availability. Following this, the Court will set a date for the hearings.

132.   Mediation was recently held in relation to an appeal against a resource consent authorising the establishment of the THM Limited basketball training and event facility in Judea. Staff are hopeful that this matter can be resolved through settlement.

133.   The EPA have outlined engagement protocols and likely requirements from Council to assist them in their role of the Consenting Panel for the Sanderson Group’s Pitau Road project, which has been referred via the COVID-19 Recovery (Fast-track Consenting) Act 2020. Staff are preparing to receive formal requests for comments in late November/early December.

134.   Staff are progressing investigations into the use of motels for short-term/emergency social housing, following concerns being raised by members of the community.

Environmental Regulation

Alcohol Licensing

135.   Between 1 October and 20 November 2023, the Alcohol Licensing team has forwarded 219 various alcohol licensing applications to the District Licensing Committee for consideration and determination. A breakdown of the applications is provided in the table below.

Applications forward to the District Licensing Committee

 

Application Type

Number

YTD

OFF Licence (New)

2

4

OFF Licence (Renewal)

4

16

ON Licence (New)

6

11

ON Licence (Renewal)

19

45

Club Licence (New)

 

 

Club Licence (Renewal)

1

8

Temporary Authorities (ON & OFF)

13

20

Manager (New)

36

147

Manager (Renewal)

29

99

Special Licence

109

210

Total:

219

560

 

136.   The team also completed 35 premises inspections within this period, ensuring that licensed premises were being operated and managed as required under legislation. For the year-to-date, the team has inspected 84 new and renewal licensed premises.

Enforcement

 

Number

YTD

Infringements

0

3

ARLA Suspensions

0

4

ARLA Cancellations

0

0

Total:

0

7

 

137.   There have been no infringements or applications for suspension of a licence or certificate made to the Alcohol Regulatory Licensing Authority (ARLA) in this current reporting period.

District Licensing Committee Hearings Held

 

Number

YTD

ON LICENCE

3

6

OFF LICENCE

 

2

CLUB LICENCE

 

 

MANAGER

 

7

TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

 

3

SPECIAL LICENCE

 

 

Total

3

18

 

138.   Of the three applications referred to hearing for determination by the District Licensing Committee (DLC), one was granted and two were declined. The two declined were applications for a renewal of an ON Licence (Mount Social Club in Mount Maunganui) and an application for a new ON Licence (Greerton Social Club in Greerton). In relation to the declined applications, although there are two separate companies involved, the business owner is the same.

139.   The DLC indicated in their decision for the Mount Social Club that the amenity and good order of the area would increase by more than a minor extent if the renewal was refused. It had become evident during proceedings and during deliberations that the DLC believed that the actions required to safely manage Mount Social Club was not being carried out by the applicant. The DLC decided in this case to put public safety first and subsequently found the applicant unsuitable to operate such a high-risk tavern-style premises in the Mount Maunganui precinct.

140.   The decision to refuse the Mount Social Club application also reflected on the ability of the applicant to hold the same type of licence at the proposed new premises known as Greerton Social Club. As the business owners were the same, the DLC found them unsuitable to hold a tavern-style ON Licence.

141.   The applicant for both declined applications has advised Council that they are likely to appeal the District Licensing Committee decisions to the Alcohol Regulatory Licensing Authority (ARLA).

Local Alcohol Policy

142.   Recent changes to the Local Alcohol Policy were decided on by the Strategy, Finance and Risk Committee at a deliberation hearing on 30 October, with changes coming into force on 12 February 2024. These changes include:

(a)     Changing the opening sales time for ALL off-licensed premises from 7 am to 10 am.

(b)     No new bottle stores in areas where the deprivation index is 9 or 10.

(c)     A change to the closing time for on-license premises in the city centre bars to 2 am, instead of the current 3 am closing time.

(d)     A change to the one-way door policy, which will start at 1 am, instead of the current 2 am closing time.

(e)     A range of discretionary conditions that can be applied to off-license premises.

143.   Messaging has gone out to all those licensed premises affected by the changes, with further messaging to the public to be undertaken in the early new year. There are also plans to hold in-person meetings with affected parties in the lead-up to the changes coming into effect.

Environmental Health

144.   72 verifications of food businesses were undertaken in October and November this year, and 252 so far this financial year. Of the 252 verifications conducted year-to-date, eight received an ‘unacceptable outcome’.

145.   An unacceptable outcome means that the business had a number of non-compliances that need to be resolved, and the business’s verification frequency will increase until compliance improves. When a food business receives an unacceptable outcome, it must gain two acceptable outcomes before its verification frequency can be decreased.

146.   Registrations and service requests are set out below.

 

Registrations

1 October to 20 November

YTD

 

Food Registrations - New

42

113

 

Food Registrations - Renew

89

334

 

Health Registrations – New

3

5

 

Health Registrations - Renew

4

149

These are generally renewed in August, September, and October

 

Service Requests (complaints, queries etc)

1 October to 20 November

YTD

 

Food safety and suitability enquiries, complaints, investigations and enforcement

10

27

27 total investigations resulting in 8 enforcement interventions

Customer queries

12

33

 

Health registration

1

5

 

Hairdressers

0

4

 

Housing

1

1

 

Health miscellaneous

4

7

 

Food registrations

32

87

 

Compliments (on service)

2

3

 

TOTAL:

 

167

 

 

Matters of Interest

147.   The Environmental Health team hosted a regional food meeting in November, with verifiers and food safety officers attending from the Ministry for Primary Industries and Taupo, Rotorua, Western Bay of Plenty, Whakatane and Opotiki District Councils. Agenda items included an MPI compliance update; conducting verification of Kombucha manufacture and critical control points; preparing for a food complaint investigation; our tools of the trade (essential items for checking compliance); overview of the recent nationwide Prime energy drink investigation and seizures; and a general Q and A session.

Animal Services

148.   Actions taken in relation to Animal Services complaints received from 1 October to 23 November are listed below.

 

Warnings / Notice

Abatement Notices

Dangerous / Menacing Classifications

Infringements Issued

Prosecutions Commenced

Oct 23

Barking - 43

 

Dangerous - 1

 

 

Roaming - 16

2

Menacing - 2

164

0

Aggression - 3

 

Section 62 Muzzle - 2

 

 

Nov 23

Barking - 27

 

Dangerous - 0

 

 

Roaming - 8

2

Menacing - 2

130

1

Aggression - 1

 

Section 62 Muzzle - 0

 

 

YTD

Barking 178

 

Dangerous - 1

 

 

Roaming 63

15

Menacing - 6

492

2

Aggression 17

 

Section 62 Muzzle - 10

 

 

 

149.   As of 24 November, 92.8% of known dogs have been registered. This is an improvement on last year’s registration rate and is certainly a big leap from late-July when only 74.1% of known dogs had been registered.

Matters of Interest

150.   One of the more unusual captures occurred during November when an Animal Services Officer was driving down Welcome Bay Road and came across a dog with a lamb happily trotting alongside it. He stopped his van and gave the dog a call, it walked over to him and jumped into the back of the van when he opened the door. The lamb then came over, and after walking around the van stood by the back near the dog and was captured. Both were claimed by their owner and reunited a few days later.

151.   The dog control officers recently attended a training course at TECT Park, learning how to respond if they be attacked by an aggressive dog. The facilitator of this training was Guus Knopers, who trains dogs for Kiwi Aversion, Customs and Border Control. In the past and through Guss, Animal Services has rehomed two dogs from the pound for new-found careers in drug and bomb detection. During the training, one of the officers’ tasks was to escape to their vehicle with a Belgian Malinois attached to their arm. This proved quite difficult, particularly if the vehicle was locked as they didn’t have keyless entry (something to consider for future vehicles).

152.   The job isn’t all about dogs and the team ended up having to remove two pigs from a property in Gate Pa. Pigs are not allowed to be kept within the city boundary and in addition, the environment the pigs were being kept in was poor. After several complaints, staff managed to convince the owner to hand the pigs over – failure to do so would have led to infringements from the SPCA and we would have had to execute a search warrant and seize the animals.  Each pig weighed in around 90 kg, and it was a full team effort to move them.

Parking and Bylaws

153.   During October Council received 172 parking requests for service and 48 for Bylaw compliance matters.

154.   Council’s application to MBIE for the Freedom Camping Transition Fund has been approved. Funding of $25,000 for additional educational patrols and a communications strategy is available to council this summer season.

155.   Infringements to date are set-out below.

 

1 – 31 October

YTD

Bus Lanes

719

5240

Parking

4789

18766

Freedom Camping

56

134

Key Account Management

156.   Our Key Account Management function continues to support the delivery of excellent regulatory outcomes (primarily operating across the Environmental Planning and Building Services teams, while working closely with Infrastructure), providing a single point of contact for engagement and communication with applicants and their teams.

157.   Key projects/customers include the Civic Precinct redevelopment, The Strand, Memorial Park, 2 Devonport Road, 90 Devonport Road, Haumoana private hospital, Northern Quarter, Ministry of Education, Fosters Construction, Wolfbrook Residential Limited, Ministry of Justice, Group Home Builders, Spaces and Places capital project delivery, Mike Greer Homes, Pukaingaturu B18 Trust, Pitau Street project, Kainga Ora for Fernciffe Farm, Barrett Homes, Northern Quarter and Classic Developments. We continue to receive strong interest in this service and continue to grow our portfolio of customers in this area.

City Development

City Partnerships  

158.   The Trust Deed for the new Te Papa Community Amenities Charitable Trust has been finalised and we’re close to appointing trustees. This will be used as a vehicle to fundraise for Te Manawataki o Te Papa - Civic Precinct development initially, and then move on to fundraising for other important community amenity projects. 

159.   We have applied for $7.5 million of funding for the Local Government Flood Resilience Co-Investment Fund for the two landslides at Egret Avenue. A decision is due at the end of November.  

160.   A grant of $35,000 from The Lion Foundation has been confirmed for the Destination Skatepark Zones 3 & 4 project. A total of $4,908,217 of external funding has been granted in the last 12 months to Spaces and Places projects – see below. 

Project 

Funder 

Amount 

Destination skatepark zones 1 & 2 

TECT 

$1,023,000 

Destination skatepark zones 1 & 2 

Lotteries 

$528,847 

Destination skatepark zones 1 & 2 

NZCT 

$459,370 

Destination skatepark zones 1 & 2 

Project Tauranga 

$200k 

Destination skatepark zones 3 & 4 

Grassroots Trust 

$250k 

Destination skatepark zones 3 & 4  

The Lion Foundation  

$35k 

Destination skatepark zones 3 & 4 

NZCT 

$200k 

Marine Parade coastal pathway 

MBIE Tourism Infrastructure Fund 

$800k 

Marine Parade coastal pathway 

Port of Tauranga 

$162k 

Mauao viewing platform 

Port of Tauranga  

$150k 

Merivale Community Centre (grant transfer) 

TECT 

$300k 

Merivale Community Centre (grant transfer) 

Lottery 

$500k 

Merivale Community Centre (grant transfer)  

BayTrust 

$300k 

 

161.   Staff have undertaken a review of the Enduring Statement of Expectations (ESE), the overarching governance document which outlines the general governance principles and ongoing expectations of our five substantive council-controlled organisation (CCO) boards, with a revised ESE going to Council for approval on 27 November.  

162.   We hosted the six-monthly Governance-to-Governance function with board members from four council-controlled organisations and representatives from TCC and WBOPDC. 

163.   Te Manawataki o Te Papa Charitable Trust held its Annual General Meeting, where trustees received copies of the Annual Report and financial statements. 

164.   The City Partnership Specialist (Economic Development) continues to work closely with Priority One and the University of Waikato. The Tauranga campus has seen a 22% increase in 2024 domestic applications, compared to the same date in 2023, with indicative growth across Health, Engineering, Computing Management, Māori and Indigenous Studies, and Law. Demand for student accommodation is also up, and seven additional staff roles have been approved for 2024. With the support of TECT, the University has secured additional properties in the precinct for future activation. 

165.   Education Tauranga reports that enquiries and demand from international students in China, South Korea, India and Japan are significantly higher, and the is translating to tangible study applications. 

166.   The City Partnerships Specialist (Mainstreets) is rolling out a summer activations programme, which includes Angus Muir’s ‘Shapes of Summer’ lighting installations in the city centre from late-December to late-January. 

167.   New Funding Agreements have gone out to the four Mainstreet organisations for their signature, and all four Mainstreets have recently held their AGMs. 

168.   The City Safety and Engagement Advisor has been actively engaging with Mainstreets and their members on issues relating to safety, as well as other projects. He has also been involved in internal discussions relating to the civic response over the New Year period, providing support, information and liaison between various parties. A profile on this new role, and how well it has been received by the business community, was featured in the Weekend Sun: https://www.theweekendsun.co.nz/the-weekend-sun.html.  

Library and Community Hub 

169.   Site enabling and demolition works have commenced with construction scheduled to start in January.  

170.   The interior developed design package was approved at the November Steering Group Meeting. 

Civic Whare / Exhibition Centre / Museum (CWEM) 

171.   The revised design programme is targeting 24 November to reach developed design, with 100% detailed design due by 30 May. 

172.   Facade value engineering has progressed, with resulting design elements now being incorporated into the developed design milestone package. Revised floor plans have been approved and floor layouts are now frozen.  

173.   Early procurement and enabling works packages are currently being developed for the project, to mitigate supply chain risks.  

Tauranga Art Gallery  

174.   The seismic strengthening design has concluded and is being integrated into the detailed design package, in consultation with construction partners LT McGuinness. 

175.   The detailed designs, cost estimates, and programme will be finalised with the Tauranga Art Gallery Trust (TAGT) prior to signing the construction contract. 

The Strand Reserve  

176.   The Strand carpark is now fully closed to the public. Construction materials, including 300 tonnes of rock armour, has been delivered to site. The removal of street furniture and the dewatering tank has been completed for the construction of the northern seawall. The construction of the seawall, and installation of the living seawall pods, is underway. 

177.   The Waterfront playground is currently in the developed design phase, with 100% design due to be completed by the end of January.    

 

 

300T of rock armour delivered on site for Northern Seawall Construction to commence. 

Northern Seawall site cleared. 

Te Hononga ki Te Awanui (Harbour Link) Stage 1: Boardwalk and Underpass  

178.   A Karakia was held on 10 November, with site establishment commencing on 13 November. 

179.   Demolition of the existing boardwalk has commenced, along with construction of the temporary causeway. 

180.   Building consent and Environmental Construction Management Plan approval has been received. A revised programme has been approved with a completion date in Quarter 3 2024.  

 

Demolition of existing Boardwalk and construction of a temporary causeway to enable demolition and construction. 

Masonic Park 

181.   Site works have now commenced and engagement is ongoing to coordinate physical works with nearby hospitality businesses and the Tauranga Art Gallery. 

182.   The initial PowerCo design for relocation of the power transformer has been received. NorthPower will be engaged by PowerCo to provide a programme of works. 

183.   Issued for Construction drawings have been received and approved and all building consent RFI’s have now been closed out. 

Masonic Park construction site covered to reduce dust after excavation works.

Dive Crescent Carpark  

184.   The stormwater infrastructure installation and repaving along Dive Crescent has now been completed, as has the keystone wall and security fencing along the railway corridor. 

185.   Project completion is still on schedule for mid- to late-December. 

 

 

Keystone wall and railway corridor security fencing. 

Kerbing and footpath excavation. 

Beacon Wharf  

186.   100% detailed design for the Beacon Wharf seawall has been completed.  

187.   Blue sponge has been relocated in preparation for the works, and rock armour for the seawall has been delivered to site.  

188.   A contaminated land survey has been completed, along with the sediment and erosion control plans. 

 

 

Long Reach digger manoeuvering to avoid pohutukawa. 

Seawall construction. 

90 Devonport Road (Civic Administration Building Fit Out)  

189.   The Level 3 floor was completed in early-November. Steel stud framing has been approved and ordered and the fit-out consent has been lodged. 

190.   The first of the façade glazing and cultural art panels have been installed. 

 

  

Fabricated façade art panel.

Render showing façade art panels. 

 Elizabeth Street East/Tunks Reserve  

191.   Construction of the new stairway has been completed and the civil works and footpath construction is now 95% complete. 

192.   Bush hammering works on the northern footpaths has commenced and the drinking water fountain has been installed. 

193.   Project completion is still on schedule for late-December. 

 

 

Furniture installed at one of the lookout areas. 

Bush hammering works progressing on the footpath. 

 

Banks prepared for planting. 

Memorial Park Recreation Hub  

194.   Options for the design and delivery of a new aquatics facility are scheduled to be presented to Council on 11 December.  

195.   The preliminary investigations for locating the four indoor courts are currently in progress, with the preferred option to be presented to Council on 11 December.    

 160-176 Devonport Road Carpark  

196.   Demolition is well underway and scheduled for completion pre-Christmas.   

197.   A three-month Civil Works contract to establish the car park is due to commence in January, including the relocation of the Masonic Park bus shelter and Midnight Sun artwork.  

City Development 

198.   Work is currently underway to make small improvements to the streetscape area on Grey Steet outside the entrance to He Puna Manawa. The works include the replacement of the maintenance-intensive Queen Palms, and removal of the cracked walls and raised planters. Works are expected to be completed in the first week of December and will inform a future extension of the streetscape improvements to Grey Street. 

199.   A masterplan of Red Square public realm and art improvements is being prepared and an activation plan has been announced for the Square over the summer months. Red Square will be a key public space for the city centre while Te Manawataki o Te Papa, Masonic Park, and the Waterfront are under development. 

200.   Council staff from across the organisation came together recently to form the ‘city centre taskforce’, in an effort to develop a coordinated approach to minimising disruption and maximising efficiencies across the city centre. This place-based approach to collaboration across the organisation, brought together capital delivery activities with asset renewals, operational activities and commercial developments, to ensure we build and retain social licence with our community through this significant regeneration programme. 

201.   An accessibility audit has been completed for the city centre and alongside the transportation team, we’re moving to implement quick wins which will make immediate improvements to our city centre streets and public spaces. 

Brand Tauranga 

202.   Work continues on the development of a destination marketing brand for Tauranga and the sub-region. A newly formed governance group has met twice and is working to deliver this new brand in the first half of 2024. Further updates will be provided early in the New Year. 

City Centre Parking Data 

203.   October city centre parking data is shown below. The first two graphs outline occupancy rates in the Elizabeth Street and Spring Street parking buildings per hour, showing that there is significant parking availability in both buildings from late afternoon. The second table also illustrates that the Spring Street parking building has lower occupancy rates, as people get used to it being fully open again – increased communications will help to raise awareness. 

 

Elizabeth Street parking building – October occupancy rates above 

 

 Spring Street parking building – October occupancy rates above 

 

204.   The table below shows how people paid for on-street parking in October, with credit card at pay machines being the preferred way to pay. App usage remains high with commuter parkers, so encouraging lunch-time (short-term) parkers to use the app will help the ease of parking.  

  

Communications and Engagement  

205.   November saw the continuation of the “It’s On” campaign to continue to raise awareness of what’s happening in the city centre, help people understand the ‘why’ behind the disruption, and send people to our dedicated web pages (www.tauranga.govt.nz/ourfuturecitycentre) for more information. This communications activity included a media release, as well as radio and billboard advertising (as below). 

   

 

206.   With a number of key waterfront projects now in full swing, our continued focus is to share the story of transformation and share progress with the community as it happens, so they can visualise how the area will come to life over the coming year. This has included stories related to the ‘living seawall’ (click for the media release, with artist impression below), construction of the boardwalk, and the Beacon Wharf upgrade, with more to come.  

 

207.   A key project in development is the collection of data to track the impact that the city centre transformation is having in a variety of ways. This involves measuring aspects like spend/transactions, foot traffic, parking, transport modes, building consents and environmental impacts. 

208.   The ‘Summer in our city centre’ initiative has kicked off for another year, offering a series of free, family-friendly events to encourage people to visit the area. The events page on the My Tauranga website is pictured below. To raise awareness and encourage people to join in the fun, a marketing and communications campaign is being rolled-out, which includes billboard, radio, print, bus back, digital ads, posters and social promotion.

Events on offer include free outdoor cinema nights, sunrise pilates, lunchtime yoga, live music, markets, family fun and more. The annual ‘Tauranga Moana Bomb Comp’ is also back by popular demand and will take place at the main wharf on the waterfront on Saturday, 16 December.

Events held so far have been well attended by the community. 

 

 

209.   Proactive face-to-face engagement with impacted local businesses continues, with the main topics discussed including the upgrades to Elizabeth Street/Tunks Reserve, upgrades at Masonic Park, closure of The Strand carpark, and what disruption to expect during pre-construction works at Te Manawataki o Te Papa between now and the end of the year. An ‘It’s On’ brochure was also distributed to stakeholders to share with customers. A ‘City Partners’ stakeholder event was held on 27 November to provide some of our key stakeholders with a broad update on the work taking place in the city centre. 

 

Attachments

1.       Key Events - December to March - A15335124  

 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 



Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

11.10     Te Manawataki o Te Papa Ltd - Letter of Expectation for 2024-25

File Number:           A15362085

Author:                    Sanjana France, CCO Specialist

Authoriser:              Gareth Wallis, General Manager: City Development & Partnerships

 

Purpose of the Report

1.       The purpose of this report is to confirm the Letter of Expectation for 2024-25 from Tauranga City Council to one of its council-controlled organisations, Te Manawataki o Te Papa Limited.

Recommendations

That the Council:

(a)     Receives the report "Te Manawataki o Te Papa Ltd - Letter of Expectation for 2024-25".

(b)     Approves the Letter of Expectation from Tauranga City Council to Te Manawataki o Te Papa Ltd (Attachment 1).

 

 

Executive Summary

2.       A Letter of Expectation for Tauranga City Council’s (TCC) newest council-controlled organisation, Te Manawataki o Te Papa Limited (TMOTPL) is attached for Council’s approval.

3.       Letters of Expectation for three council-controlled organisations, Bay Venues Limited, Tauranga Art Gallery Trust and Tourism Bay of Plenty, were approved previously by Council on 3 November 2023.

4.       These letters provide guidance to the council-controlled organisations on what Council expects to see in their Statements of Intent for 2024-25 to 2026-27.

Background

Legislative requirements for council-controlled organisations

5.       Part 5 of the Local Government Act 2002 sets out the statutory regime for council-controlled organisations. The key components are:

·    appointment of directors/trustees;

·    consideration of the draft statement of intent and providing comment;

·    regularly monitoring council-controlled organisation’s performance; and

·    including the council-controlled organisation’s objectives and performance in the council’s long-term plan, annual plan, and annual report.

6.       Under the Local Government Act legislative framework, Council has minimal opportunity for input into a council-controlled organisation’s planning for the following year, until the draft Statement of Intent has been completed and submitted to Council, at which point Council has two months to respond.

7.       Several councils take a more proactive approach, working collaboratively with their council-controlled organisations and providing them with clear guidance at the early stages of the annual planning process. This helps ensure that the council-controlled organisation’s objectives and strategies are aligned with the councils, and is particularly important when council-controlled organisations deliver significant services on its behalf.

8.      

9.       Since 2014, TCC has worked proactively with its council-controlled organisations to set clear expectations and to develop expectation documents, in particular, the over-arching Enduring Statement of Expectations and the annual Letter of Expectations. The Letter of Expectations outlines key areas of focus for the council-controlled organisations for the following year, usually linked to strategic priorities for the city.

10.     This process has been focused for those substantive council-controlled organisations that TCC has significant control over i.e., Bay Venues, TAGT, TBOP (joint shareholder with Western Bay of Plenty District Council), and TMOTPL. An Office of the Auditor General Report in 2015 cited this process as an exemplar of best practice when dealing with and managing council-controlled organisations.

Letter of Expectations for 2024-2025

11.     The Letter of Expectations for TMOTPL has been socialised with the Commission and the council-controlled organisation and is provided as an attachment to this report.

12.     The Review of Strategic and Operational Alignment of TCC with its council-controlled organisations (Pedersen, February 2020) recommended that:

“Pending the development of new strategies, and to the extent that is possible, annual letters of expectation of the council-controlled organisations specify desired outcomes rather than outputs or tasks.”

13.     Given that a new elected council is planned to take office in late-July 2024, Council wishes to provide them and our council-controlled organisations with clear intentions and pathways which deliver on priority community outcomes. In the Commission’s remaining months at Council, they have a mandate to focus on delivery and finishing projects that have started, which will be reflected in the Long-term Plan 2024-34. Therefore, this year’s Letters of Expectation link to the six key priorities for the next ten years and beyond, which continue to reflect what we have heard through community consultation processes.

14.     In consideration of the upcoming local government elections in July 2024, the timeframes have been brought forward for the Statements of Intent 2024-25 to 2026-27. Council has requested the drafts are provided by 19 January 2024 and the final versions by 30 April 2024, rather than the standard legislative timeframes of 1 March and 30 June respectively.

15.     This Letter of Expectations also links to the Our Direction framework and Council’s community outcomes, which are relevant to the areas of service that the council-controlled organisations deliver on behalf of council.

16.     TMOTPL’s sub-programmes and critical governance role in overseeing the delivery of civic precinct development projects is discussed in the Letter of Expectation, and their key partnership position is further encouraged.

17.     One of six strategic priorities for Council is to drive delivery of the City Centre Masterplan –Te Manawataki o Te Papa, the broader City Centre Action and Investment Plan, and the Te Papa Peninsula Spatial Plan to revitalise and reactivate the heart of the city. Te Manawataki o Te Papa seeks to establish Tauranga’s city centre as the commercial, civic and cultural heart of the Western Bay of Plenty sub region. This Letter of Expectations highlights TMOTPL’s important role and their core projects which are central to delivering this transformation.

18.     This year’s Letter of Expectations encourages accountability and transparency in decision-making, increased diversity and accessibility, efficient use of public funds, tangata whenua partnerships, and managing the balance between social, economic, cultural and environmental wellbeing of our communities.

19.     Council expects that the strategic priorities contained in this Letter of Expectations will be reflected by the TMOTPL Board in their Statement of Intent. These should be supported by a realistic number of performance indicator measures where appropriate, which should help tell the story of the ongoing value back to Council and the community.


 

Strategic / Statutory Context

20.     While not a legislative requirement under the Local Government Act (2002), when combined with the Enduring Statement of Expectations, the Letter of Expectation is a key document through which Council provides clear guidance to its council-controlled organisations.

21.     The Letters of Expectation help ensure that the council-controlled organisation’s objectives and strategies are aligned with Council’s, by providing key areas of focus that Council expects to see reflected in the council-controlled organisations’ Statements of Intent. 

Options Analysis

Option 1: Approve the Letters of Expectation RECOMMENDED

22.    Council approves the Letter of Expectations for TMOTPL.

Advantages

Disadvantages

·    Council-controlled organisations are part of the TCC group and are expected to operate in ways which contribute to the success of the group as a whole.

·    The community outcomes that are delivered by services provided from the council-controlled organisations assist Council to achieve the community outcomes and four wellbeings prioritised through the Long-term Plan.

·    Nil

Option 2: Do not approve the Letters of Expectation NOT RECOMMENDED

23.    Council does not approve the Letters of Expectation for the council-controlled organisations.

Advantages

Disadvantages

·    Nil

·    Council may not be able to achieve its Long-term Plan community outcomes.

·    Lack of strategic direction, leading to a potential negative impact on Council’s relationship with its TMOTPL.

Financial Considerations

24.     There are no financial considerations.

Legal Implications / Risks

25.     There are no legal implications or risks.

Consultation / Engagement

26.     Community consultation or engagement is not required or appropriate for this matter.

Significance

27.     The Local Government Act 2002 requires an assessment of the significance of matters, issues, proposals and decisions in this report against Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.  Council acknowledges that in some instances a matter, issue, proposal or decision may have a high degree of importance to individuals, groups, or agencies affected by the report.


 

28.     In making this assessment, consideration has been given to the likely impact, and likely consequences for:

(a)   the current and future social, economic, environmental, or cultural well-being of the district or region;

(b)   any persons who are likely to be particularly affected by, or interested in, the matter; and

(c)   the capacity of the local authority to perform its role, and the financial and other costs of doing so.

29.     In accordance with the considerations above, criteria and thresholds in the policy, it is considered that the matter is of medium significance.

ENGAGEMENT

30.     Taking into consideration the above assessment, that the matter is of medium significance, officers are of the opinion that no further engagement is required prior to Council making a decision.

          Click here to view the TCC Significance and Engagement Policy

Next Steps

31.     Once adopted, the Letters of Expectation will be incorporated into an official letter to each council-controlled organisation, signed by the Commission Chair and delivered to the Chair of each council-controlled organisation by email.

32.     The Letters of Expectation are intended to inform the council-controlled organisations’ draft Statements of Intent, which are due to Council on the earlier than usual date of 19 January 2024.

33.     Council will then provide feedback on the draft Statements of Intent to the council-controlled organisations by the earlier than usual date of 1 March 2024. The final Statements of Intent must be adopted by the council-controlled organisation boards and submitted to Council by 30 April 2024. This date will enable the Commission to approve the Statements of Intent before the end of their term.

Attachments

1.       DRAFT for approval - TMOTPL Letter of Expectations 2024-25 (A15221360) - A15371255  

 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 



 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

11.11     Meetings Schedule 2024

File Number:           A15294640

Author:                    Coral Hair, Manager: Democracy and Governance Services

Authoriser:              Christine Jones, General Manager: Strategy, Growth & Governance

 

Purpose of the Report

1.       This report recommends the adoption of a meetings schedule for the first six months of 2024 until the Commission’s term of office concludes after the 20 July 2024 election.

 

Recommendations

That the Council:

(a)     Receives the report "Meetings Schedule 2024".

(b)     Adopts Attachment 1 as the meetings schedule for the period January to July 2024.

 

 

Background

2.       The Council may adopt a schedule of meetings to cover any future period the Council considers appropriate. It is recommended that the Council adopts a meetings schedule for the period January to July 2024 as included in Attachment 1.

3.       The schedule sets out a three-weekly Council meeting cycle, with the Strategy, Finance and Risk Committee meetings to be held six-weekly and as required. The other two committees and advisory groups are held every two or three months.

4.       Dates for joint committee meetings are co-ordinated with the Bay of Plenty Regional Council, the Western Bay of Plenty District Council and other councils in the Bay of Plenty. The joint committee dates go beyond July 2024. 

5.       Dates for hearings and deliberations on the Long-Term Plan 2024-34 have been included in the meetings schedule.

Date

LTP Related Meeting

12-14 February 2024

Council – Hearing of submissions

4-5 March 2024 d

Council – deliberations on submissions

22 April 2024

Council - Adopt Long-Term Plan 2024-34

 

6.       The Local Government New Zealand Conference, Zone 2 and Metro meeting dates are included in the schedule.

Strategic / Statutory Context

7.       Clause 19(6) of Schedule 7 of the Local Government Act 2002 provides for the Council to adopt a meeting schedule to cover any future period.

Options Analysis

Option 1 – Adopt the meetings schedule for 2024 (preferred option)

8.       The Council has the option of adopting a meetings schedule for the period January-July 2024.

9.       The incoming council will adopt their governance structure and meetings schedule for the second half of 2024 when they take office following the elections on 20 July 2024.

10.     This option enables the Commissioners, external appointees, staff, media and the public to know when meetings are scheduled for the term of the Commission.

11.     While the Council has previously adopted a year’s meetings schedule, the six-month period is required in these circumstances. For these reasons this option is preferred.

Option 2 – Adopt a meetings schedule for a different time period

12.     The Council has the option of adopting a meetings schedule for a different time period; for example, 12 months.

13.     This option would still provide for certainty; however, the Commission cannot bind the incoming Council who will adopting a meetings schedule when they come into office that reflects the governance structure they adopt.  Joint committee meetings will have been set for the full year and these will be incorporated into the meetings schedule for the second half of the year. For these reasons this option is not preferred.

Financial Considerations

14.     There are no financial considerations to adopting a meetings schedule.

Legal Implications / Risks

15.     The legislation provides for the adoption of a schedule of meetings.

Significance

16.     The Local Government Act 2002 requires an assessment of the significance of matters, issues, proposals and decisions in this report against Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.  Council acknowledges that in some instances a matter, issue, proposal or decision may have a high degree of importance to individuals, groups, or agencies affected by the report.

17.     In making this assessment, consideration has been given to the likely impact, and likely consequences for:

(a)   the current and future social, economic, environmental, or cultural well-being of the district or region

(b)   any persons who are likely to be particularly affected by, or interested in, the decision.

(c)   the capacity of the local authority to perform its role, and the financial and other costs of doing so.

18.     In accordance with the considerations above, criteria and thresholds in the policy, it is considered that the decision is of low significance.

ENGAGEMENT

19.     Taking into consideration the above assessment, that the decision is of low significance, officers are of the opinion that no further engagement is required prior to Council making a decision.

Next Steps

20.     Meetings schedule to be available on the Council’s website.

21.     Calendar requests sent out.

Attachments

1.       2024 Planner - January - July Meeting Schedule - A15371032  

 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 



Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

11.12     Overview Report - Memorial Park Recreation Hub Programme

File Number:           A15307703

Author:                    Mike Naude, Director of Civic Developments

Authoriser:              Marty Grenfell, Chief Executive

 

Purpose of the Report

1.   The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of the suite of reports included on this agenda related to the Memorial Park Recreation Hub Programme. This includes providing the history, strategic context and information that is pertinent to all of the reports, as well as an overview of how each report fits within the wider programme of works. This report presents three options for the delivery of the Memorial Park Recreation Hub, based on the findings of the individual reports. Having considered all reports in the suite, this report provides recommendations for the suite of decisions that will deliver the programme budget.

Recommendations

That the Council:

a)   Receives the report "Overview Report - Memorial Park Recreation Hub Programme"; and

·                 Either:

b)   Approves option B as outlined in this report, at a total programme cost of $150.85M, to include:

§ An aquatics centre with leisure, toddler, programme, bombing pools, splash pad, eight indoor lanes and two outdoor lanes (option 2) at a cost of $119.85M.

§ Indoor courts at an alternative city-centre location with 4 courts at a cost of $25M.

§ Upgrades to the Memorial Park to enhance parking, access, recreation facilities for young people and spaces for community gatherings at a cost of $6M.

·                 Or:

c)   Approves option C as outlined in this report, at a total programme cost of $140.8M, to include:

§ An aquatics centre with leisure, toddler, programme, bombing pools, splash pad, two indoor lanes, eight outdoor lanes, and three hydro slides (option 3) at a cost of $107.4M.

§ Indoor courts at an alternative city-centre location with 4 courts at a cost of $25M.

§ Upgrades to the Memorial Park to enhance parking, access, recreation facilities for young people and spaces for community gatherings at a cost of $6M.

d)   Note that funding is available within the current Long-term Plan 2021-31 budgets to accommodate option b or c of this report; and

e)   Note that any adjustments to future funding requirements for active reserves will be addressed through the Executive Report to the Long-term Plan 2024-34 deliberations.

 

BACkGROUND

2.   Memorial Park is a large recreational park in Tauranga’s central Te Papa Peninsula and home to Memorial Pool, Queen Elizabeth Youth Centre/Memorial Hall (referenced as QEYC) and a range of recreational amenities.  Memorial Pool is an outdoor pool built in 1958 which is coming to the end of its useful life.  QEYC is a well-used multi-court facility built in 1965 which is coming to the end of its useful life. Both the pool and hall are managed by Bay Venues Limited on behalf of the Council.

A history of decisions to redevelop the Memorial Pool and Memorial Hall

3.   A 2017 needs assessment undertaken on Memorial Pool (alongside Otumoetai Pool) found there is a clear case for change, not only driven by the age, condition, use and financial costs, but also recognising the modern requirements of an aquatic facility to be fit for purpose and meet the needs of a diverse and growing population.  The needs assessment recommended undertaking a feasibility study for a multi-purpose recreation and leisure facility in Tauranga central/west catchment.

4.   Budget was included in Council’s Long-Term Plan (LTP) 2018-28 for Bay Venues to redevelop Memorial Pool at a budget of $30M from 2022 to 2023.

5.   In 2018, Tauranga City Council and Bay Venues Ltd agreed to undertake a feasibility study on a new multi-purpose aquatics/recreation hub in the CBD.  In 2019, Bay Venues Ltd commissioned Visitor Solutions, HDT Architecture and Boffa Miskell to undertake a community facilities needs analysis and feasibility study for a CBD recreation and leisure hub located on Memorial Park.  This feasibility study was completed early in 2020 and was due to be presented to Tauranga City Council in March 2020 but was cancelled due to the March 2020 COVID-19 lockdown.

6.   The feasibility study identified significant demand for increased aquatic provision in Tauranga, particularly indoor and leisure water. A key conclusion for the feasibility study was Tauranga’s aquatic network has insufficient leisure provision for the majority of aquatic users. This conclusion was based on the 2019 needs analysis which concluded that there is significant need to provide more aquatic leisure in the network to cater for the largest group of aquatic users and reduce pressure on Baywave. 

7.   The feasibility study was based around a large-scale $95 million development proposal which included indoor/outdoor aquatic facilities, indoor courts, fitness centre, mini-golf and a spa/wellness centre.

8.   Due to Tauranga City Council’s financial constraints and large capital works programme, Tauranga City Council and Bay Venues Ltd reviewed the CBD Recreation and Leisure Hub feasibility study in late 2020.The revised feasibility study and business case informed the development of budgets for the 2021-31 LTP.

9.   The Council’s Community Facilities Investment Plan 2021 identified the Memorial Park Recreation Hub (replacement of Memorial Pool) and redevelopment of the Memorial Hall (including provision of additional courts as part of the Memorial Park Recreation Hub) as a priority for the 2021-31 LTP.

10. The Council consulted with the community on the redevelopment of the Memorial Park pool ($49M) and the redevelopment of the Memorial Park indoor sports facility ($54M) through the LTP. The Council’s final 2021-31 LTP included projects to redevelop the Memorial Park pool and indoor sports facility ($52M for the Aquatics Centre and $48M for the indoor sports facility).

11. The Council has developed a number of Action and Investment Plans over the last year which have included the Memorial Park, Aquatic Centre and Recreation Hub as priority actions.

12. The Council is currently consulting on the draft LTP 2024-34. The draft LTP budgets include the Memorial Park Aquatics, Recreation Hub and Park enhancements at a total budget of $129.6M to be completed by the end of 2028.

13. A project team was set up in June 2023 to deliver concept plans for the delivery of a new Memorial Park Recreation Hub and a Memorial Park Spatial Plan. The initial scope of the recreation hub included a new aquatic facility and indoor sports facility as provided for in the 2021 LTP.

The case for investment in the park, pool and indoor courts

14. The 2019/20 Feasibility Study recommended a redeveloped Memorial Pool should provide for core functions of aquatic play and leisure (both indoor and outdoor), learn to swim, therapy, fitness and some aspects of aquatic sport. Retaining outdoor provision was identified as important to the aquatic network to support leisure provision. The need for Indoor Courts was identified as part of the Recreation Hub, with a strong need for more indoor courts across the city, to cater for current demand and future population growth. 

15. The feasibility study identified a clear case for investment of aquatic and indoor court facilities at Memorial Park:

Gap in aquatic leisure

There is a significant gap in the provision of aquatic leisure to provide for the greatest proportion of aquatic users.  This should preferably be indoor all-year round, supplemented by an outdoor leisure pool to replace the outdoor pools at Memorial Pool.

Aging assets at the end of useful life

Memorial Pool is over 70 years old and Memorial Hall is 65 years old. Both are at the end of their useful life.  Redevelopment is more economic compared to ongoing repair.

QEYC also has condition issues with roofing, cladding and ventilation issues which need to be addressed to secure the ongoing provision.

The current playground is at the end of its useful life

Indoor court capacity

QEYC/Memorial Hall is a well utilised indoor court facility which is vital to the network and cannot be lost.  In addition, Tauranga needs more indoor courts to cater for current and future demand.  Retaining the existing provision and any opportunity to increase capacity should be considered.

Increased aquatic provision

 

Tauranga needs more indoor aquatic provision to cater for current and future demand.  Increasing aquatic capacity will relieve heavy pressure on neighbouring Baywave and Greerton facilities, particularly if centrally located in Tauranga’s CBD.  Development of Memorial Pool as a citywide facility is identified as the most important aquatic action in the 2019 Needs Analysis.

Learn to swim and hydrotherapy

Learn to swim and hydrotherapy are important aquatic markets particularly recognising Tauranga’s younger and older populations. These programmes also provide opportunities for revenue generation.

Revenue generation

Opportunities to improve the financial performance of community facilities should be considered such as fitness centre or commercial leisure eg hydro slides.

Increased need for recreational and social outdoor space

The Memorial Park will become an even more highly valued space for casual recreation, social gathering, and “being outside” as surrounding development is intensified with less private outdoor space. The current visual quality does not truly reflect the status of the park as a high-profile reserve or reinforce the park’s historic purpose as a community focused gathering place.

·             

Governance Council Controlled Organisation

16. The Council has created a separate entity to govern the Te Manawataki o Te Papa project delivery, Te Manawataki o Te Papa Limited (CCO). the Memorial Park Recreation Hub programme is also governed by the CCO. In addition, the programme is informed by the Civic Development Assurance Group. Early discussion has included the establishment of a Steering Group, Design and Technical Reference Groups to guide the project through the preliminary design stage. Actual operational delivery is by way of resources either employed by or contracted to Council. Council is the principal to all project development contracts with suppliers and the employer of the project management team.

17. The Te Manawataki o Te Papa Board have reviewed the suite of reports relating to this project. The Board Chairperson will speak at the 11 December Council meeting to present the views of the Board on the matters contained within the report. It is expected that the Board Chairperson will table a short written paper on behalf of the Board.

 

Overall Programme Options

18. The Memorial Park Recreation Hub is a programme to redevelop the Memorial Hall, Memorial Pool and Memorial Park to provide modern, fit for purpose recreation and sports facilities to meet the needs of the Tauranga community, as part of the broader network of facilities.

19. The project scope envisaged a combined multi-sport and aquatic centre within Memorial Park. However, initial scoping works identified that the cost of $175M was well outside the project budget of $122M (excluding $8M Memorial Park upgrades).

20. Alternative options have been investigated to deliver the Memorial Park Hub programme outcomes for the community, but within the LTP budget.

21. The programme team has looked to develop more affordable options for the aquatics facility, with a focus on prioritising the greatest need in the city’s aquatic network. In accordance with the needs analysis the priority for increased aquatic facilities is in the recreational/leisure use, which currently represents approximately 20% of the network offering, and based on national benchmarks would be expected to represent 60-70% of the network.

22. The programme team has also considered alternative locations for both components of the programme; the aquatic centre and the multi-sports centre (indoor courts). A high-level analysis of alternative locations for the aquatic centre identified that Memorial Park was still the preferred location for the aquatic centre. A viable alternative venue for the indoor courts has been identified.

23. The individual reports included on the agenda alongside this overview report outline various options for Council to deliver on the programme, including the provision of indoor courts at a different location from the aquatic centre.

24. A range of options are outlined on the following page for Council consideration:

·           

RELATED REPORTS ON COUNCIL AGENDA 11 DECEMBER 2023

25. Based on the options outlined above, there are a number of reports on this 11 December 2023 Council agenda. These reports consider a range of matters which are directly, or indirectly related to the Memorial Park Recreation Hub Programme.

26. Below is a summary of the reports and the matters which they address:

Report Title

Purpose

Memorial Park Recreation Hub – Aquatics Options Report

This report presents the revised Memorial Park Recreation Hub concept design for approval. It outlines three options for the Council to consider for the development of a Memorial Park Recreation Hub, including retaining a Recreation Hub facility in one venue that incorporates both aquatic and indoor court facilities, or achieving the same level of services over two sites.

Approval of Memorial Park Site Development Plan

This report presents the Memorial Park Site Development Plan, including seeking confirmation to progress the external landscaping upgrades proposed as part of the wider Memorial Park to complement and facilitate the Aquatic Centre project.

Strategic Property Purchase for Memorial Park Recreation Hub Project

Due to the nature of this report it is being considered in public excluded. However, the purpose of this report is to ensure the most cost-effective delivery of the Programme objectives, specifically related to indoor court provision. This report provides for the purchase of an alternative site for provision of indoor court facilities.

Concept Design for indoor courts

Due to the nature of this report it is being considered in public excluded. However, the purpose of this report is to ensure the most cost-effective delivery of the Programme objectives, specifically related to indoor court provision. This report considers the possible design of indoor court facilities at an alternative location.

Procurement Strategy

Due to the nature of this report it is being considered in public excluded. The purpose of this report is to ensure the most cost-effective delivery of the Programme objectives by presenting options for the procurement of the Memorial Park Recreation Hub Programme.

Strategic / Statutory Context

27. Council adopted a new vision for Tauranga City Council in June 2022, and also endorsed it as a shared Vision for Tauranga. The vision is based on three key themes clearly expressed by our communities as being important for a future Tauranga – environment, community and inclusivity, and vibrancy. These three themes form the basis of the vision statement:

Tauranga, together we can

Prioritise nature

Tauranga is a city where… we celebrate, protect and enhance our natural environment, integrating it into the city for all to enjoy

Lift each other up

Tauranga is a city where… we foster and grow our communities, celebrate our differences, and lift up those who are vulnerable

Fuel possibility

Tauranga is a city where… we foster creativity and innovation, celebrate our arts and culture, and empower our changemakers to create a vibrant city into the future

With everyone playing their part, together we can create the change our city needs.
Kei a tātou te pae tawhiti
The future is all of ours.

Because, Tauranga, together we can.

28. In August 2023, the Council adopted the ‘Our Public Places Strategy’ with the ambition of:

Together we can have public places to play, relax, be inspired, and connect with people and nature.

29. In August 2023, the Council also adopted a Play, Active Recreation, and Sport Action and Investment Plan, 2023-33 (AIP).

30. This AIP focuses on the Our Public Places Strategic Plan objective of: Increasing participation by providing easily accessible opportunities for organised and informal play, active recreation, and sport for people of all ages, backgrounds, and abilities.

31. The AIP identified 5 actions related to the Memorial Park Recreation Hub:

Action No.

Actions and programmes of work

Proposed timeframes

Indicative cost[4]

Who

Priority

25.

Redevelopment of Memorial Hall (QEYC) and provision of additional court as part of Memorial Park Recreation Hub

Short Term

$$$$ LTP 2023- 2025

TCC, Bay Venues Ltd, User Groups

Priority action

33.

Replacement of Memorial Pool with Memorial Park Recreation Hub (indoor and outdoor pools).

Short Term

$$$$ LTP 2026- 2028

TCC

Priority action

7.

Memorial Park - reserve development to consider interface of the park with the Memorial Park Recreation Hub, including playground redevelopment and consideration of other play and active recreation opportunities (including potential junior bike skills path, skate park and hard courts)

Medium Term

$$$ LTP 2026- 2027

TCC

Priority action

38.

Replace destination playground at Memorial Park when due for renewal through site master planning. Refer Memorial Park Master Planning Action

Medium Term

$$$ LTP 2026- 2027 (cost is full reserve master plan)

TCC

Priority action

30.

Find alternative space for displaced users from 3 courts while Memorial Hall is redevelopment and Mount Sports Centre (e.g. school gyms, vacant industrial building, outdoor courts)

Immediate – Short Term

Part of wider project budgets

TCC, Bay Venues, other potential host sites

 

 

32. The Memorial Park upgrade also aligns with Council’s Reserves and Open Space Action and Investment Plan, which includes aspirations to increase participation by providing easily accessible opportunities for organised and informal play for people of all ages, backgrounds and abilities; and emphasise the green environment, passive space and amenity functions of our reserves, as well as the traditional play space.

Financial Considerations

33. The total programme budget of $129.6M is included in the draft Long-Term Plan 2024-34. In addition, the Long-term Plan includes budgets for various active reserves.

34. Option B outlined in this report has a total programme cost of $150.85M. Option C outlined in this report has a total programme cost of $140.8M

35. Both options outlined in this report can be accommodated within existing Long-Term Plan 2021-31 budgets, and any additional adjustments required to the active reserves budget in the 2024-34 Long-term Plan will be addressed through the Executive Report to the Long-term Plan deliberations.

Legal Implications / Risks

36. The Council has been undertaking work to redevelop the Memorial Hall and Pool for over five years, and a decision to not proceed with this programme would have reputational risk.

37. The current facilities are also reaching the end of their life and continuing to use the facilities without redevelopment would still require substantial upgrades and increasing maintenance costs.

38. The specific project risks, including potential for cost escalation, are included within the individual reports.

39. Relevant legal considerations are addressed within each of the individual reports.

Consultation / Engagement

40. The Council has undertaken previous engagement with the community to understand community support for this project through the Long-Term Plans 2018-28 and 2021-31.

41. The projects have garnered support from the community, including requests by users specifically for more facilities, both to cater for increased numbers and a broader variety of recreational activities.

42. Specific targeted stakeholder and mana whenua engagement has occurred as part of the development of each of the proposals and is ongoing. More detail is included in the individual reports where relevant.

Significance

43. The Local Government Act 2002 requires an assessment of the significance of matters, issues, proposals and decisions in this report against Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. Council acknowledges that in some instances a matter, issue, proposal or decision may have a high degree of importance to individuals, groups, or agencies affected by the report.

44. In making this assessment, consideration has been given to the likely impact, and likely consequences for:

(a)   the current and future social, economic, environmental, or cultural well-being of the district or region;

(b)   any persons who are likely to be particularly affected by, or interested in, the decision; and

(c)   the capacity of the local authority to perform its role, and the financial and other costs of doing so.

45. In accordance with the criteria and thresholds in the policy, the decision to build an Aquatic Centre and indoor courts is a significant investment. However, the Council has already made the decision to develop the Memorial Park Recreation Hub through the LTP 2021-31. The proposals being considered through this suite of reports has a strong and logical flow from the previous Council decision, but with some notable variations to how the project is delivered. Therefore, in accordance with the criteria and thresholds in the policy, it is considered that the issues addressed in this suite of reports are of medium significance.

46. The individual reports include a separate assessment of significance where relevant.

·    

Attachments

Nil

 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

11.13     Memorial Park Recreation Hub - Aquatics Options Report

File Number:           A15201283

Author:                    Kelvin Eden, Capital Programme Manager: Major Community Amenity

Mike Naude, Director of Civic Developments

Authoriser:              Marty Grenfell, Chief Executive

 

Purpose of the Report

1.       To present the revised Memorial Park Recreation Hub concept designs for approval including project costs and options regarding the final scope for delivery.

 

Recommendations

That the Council:

(a)     Receives the report "Memorial Park Recreation Hub - Aquatics Options Report".

(b)     Approves aquatic centre Option 2 of the attached Memorial Park Recreation Hub & Spatial Plan document at a total cost of $119.85M to progress to preliminary design including a revised costs estimate;

or

(c)     Approves aquatic centre Option 3 of the attached Memorial Park Recreation Hub & Spatial Plan document at a total cost of $107.4M, plus two additional hydro slides at a cost of $2.4M, to progress to preliminary design including a revised costs estimate.

(d)     Seeks a further report on completion of the preliminary designs and cost estimates that will include an update on findings from preconstruction investigations.

 

 

Executive Summary

2.       Following geotechnical reporting and seismic analysis of existing structures the Memorial Park Recreation Hub project has been revised to comprise a new aquatic centre on Memorial Park and an indoor court facility at an alternative location.

3.       The attached Memorial Park Recreation Hub & Spatial Plan document outlines the concept designs and costings for the project options with analysis against the critical success factors identified for the project.

4.       Two options are presented for an aquatic centre on Memorial Park with indoor court provision to be provided at an alternative location.

5.       The principal difference between aquatic centre options 2 and 3 is the location of the primary 25m lane pool within or outside the building. It is noted that Memorial Pool to be demolished is the only outdoor lane swimming pool within the TCC network.

6.       Option 2 at $119.85M has a larger building floor area with the 8 lane, 25m lane swimming pool inside and a smaller 4 lane 25m outdoor lido pool. This will offer greater pool capacity and options to structured aquatic activities at the site and within the city network.

7.       Option 3 at $107.4M will provide an 8-lane outdoor pool and a 2 lane indoor 25m pool.

8.       Option 3 includes the addition of two extra hydro slides bringing the total to three hydro slides. This comes at an estimated cost of $2.4M incorporated into option 3. The business case analysis has identified a significant uplift in visits and revenue from three slides at an additional 11,000-12,000 visits per year. This will provide an enhanced range of visitor experiences and flow into increased café and retail use.

9.       Following concept approval, the project team will progress to preliminary design and consenting. This is expected to shift to developed design in mid-2024.

Background

10.     The background to the Memorial Park facilities, the case for change and history of decisions to redevelop the Memorial Pool and Queen Elizabeth Youth Centre/Memorial Hall (referenced as QEYC) are outlined in the Overview Report – Memorial Park Recreation Hub Programme on this agenda.

11.     The attached Memorial Park Recreation Hub & Spatial Plan document outlines the project development, engagement and options developed to meet the revised project scope. This will be summarised in the section below.

concept Design & Cost Document

12.     Option 1 from the Memorial Park Recreation Hub & Spatial Plan document provides for a 10,936m² recreational hub including an indoor/outdoor aquatic centre, fitness centre and four indoor courts. At an estimated cost of $175M this option sits well outside the total project budget of $122M (excluding $8M for park upgrades). Site soil conditions are a significant factor in this cost with the need for substantial piled foundations identified through geotechnical reporting.

13.     Through a re-examination of the brief, the project team sought to substantially reduce the floor area through the removal of the indoor courts and associated components. The provision of indoor courts is being evaluated at an alternative location where a more viable financial case can be found.

14.     From a number of concepts, two options have been progressed and are outlined in the attached document and summarised below. Careful consideration has been taken to ensure these options align well with the critical success factors developed within the Memorial Park Recreation Hub Feasibility Study.

15.     The needs analysis within the Feasibility Study identified four significant conclusions on the type of aquatic provision in Tauranga’s network being:

(a)     There is a significant need to provide more aquatic leisure in the network.

(b)     Increase provision of structured water space is required.

(c)     More provision of programmable pools, learn to swim and hydrotherapy are required.

(d)     It is important to maintain some outdoor aquatic provision within the citywide network.

16.     Both options have similar sized fitness centre (620-650m²), however Option 3 would more easily allow a future extension.

17.     Both options allow for the warmer water (Programmes Pool, Learn to Swim Pool and shallow Leisure Pools) to be located inside the building. The key difference in pool provision is the location of the 25m lane pool being outside in option 3 where this pool is inside in Option 2 with an additional 4-lane lido pool outside.

18.     The projected year 1 visitor admissions for the three options are detailed in the table below. Option 1 includes a significant sum for indoor court users and spectators. Under Options 2 and 3 these users will utilise an alternate option being considered for indoor court provision.

1                 

2                Option 1

3                Option 2

4                Option 3

5                Pool Admissions

6                209,772

7                206,585

8                194,859

9                Hydro slide tickets (not extra visits)

10            32,064 (3 slides)

11            21,962 (1 slide)

12            20,737 (1 slide)

13            Fitness Centre

14            148,750

15            73,625

16            80,750

17            Indoor Courts

18            280,176

19            -

20            -

21            Spectators

22            58,625

23            29,556

24            25,114

25            Total

26            697,323

27            309,765

28            300,724

 

19.     Both options include an outdoor splashpad, bombing pool, cafe and one hydro slide. Following the development of these options the project team has recommended the addition of two hydro slides at an estimated cost of $2.4M to option 3. The attached document outlines the case for a substantial increase in visitation and revenue with this addition.

20.     A key advantage of the Memorial Park site is the availability of geothermal energy. The concept designs include geothermal bore source heating and consideration of a potential 250kW solar PV array targeting 10% on-site renewable energy generation.  By comparison, an air source heat pump option for the same facility is forecast to increase energy use by 168%.

21.     A sustainability framework has been developed by Beca for the project. The design analysis has identified that the concept designs may align with a 5 Star Greenstar rating with the inclusion of bore heading and a solar array. The project team have identified this a key consideration through the further design process. Further sustainability measures are detailed in the attached document to be considered through the design stages.

Options Analysis

Option 2

22.    

Advantages

Disadvantages

·    This option will provide a larger/deeper indoor pool capacity with a similar pool offering to Option 3 all inside with the addition of an outside lido pool.

·    A larger indoor lane pool will provide more certain year-round and all-weather use, enabling a greater capacity for structured aquatic activities within the City.

·    The larger pool provision provides more capacity in the citywide provision and could supersede the Otumoetai Pool, saving significant operating costs and need for future upgrade.

·    At a cost of $119.85M, this option is more expensive than option 3.

·    Outdoor lane provision will be reduced from the current Memorial Pool.

·    The larger building area and café provision limits the connection of the facility to the wider reserve within the identified constraints.

 

Option 3 – Recommended Option

23.    

Advantages

Disadvantages

·    At a cost of $109.8M (including two additional hydro slides) this option is cheaper that option 2.

·    The outdoor lane pool will increase the public outdoor lane pool capacity within the City.

·    The aquatic centre will achieve a greater connection to the wider reserve with an outdoor focus and more central and visible café available to facility and park users.

·    The building design allows greater flexibility to expand the fitness centre in the future.

·    The predominantly outdoor lane swimming will reduce the use seasonally and within certain weather.

·    The outdoor focus may be a deterrent to some structured aquatic activities such as water polo, underwater hockey and synchronised swimming.

·    The option will provide a lower capacity for structured aquatic use with only two indoor 25m lanes.

 

Strategic / Statutory Context

24.     Memorial Park is a high-profile reserve under the Tauranga Reserves Management Plan 2019, classified as Recreation Reserve under the Reserves Act 1977 and zoned Active Open Space under the Tauranga City Plan.

25.     Previous decision making has outlined the condition of the facilities on the park and case for change within our growing population. The provision of an enhanced aquatic and indoor court facility within the central city has subsequently been included in the Play, Active Recreation & Sport Action & Investment Plan 2023, the Community Facilities Investment Plan 2021 and proposed 2024-34 Long Term Plan.

26.     The options of this report seek to achieve the outcomes sought in Council’s strategic framework through a new aquatic facility on Memorial Park and provision of an indoor court facility on a more suitable and financially viable location.

Financial Considerations

27.     The design process has sought to provide a facility that meets the design brief as informed by the strategic planning and analysis done to date. The challenging ground conditions on Memorial Park have required a revised approach to provide the necessary indoor court and aquatic provision.

28.     The financial impact of the options presented within this report are listed below:

 

Budgets

 

Option 2

Option 3 (including 2 additional hydro slides)

Proposed Budget

$119.85M

$109.8M

 

29.     Option 3 is the most financially viable option when considered as a standalone project. However, when considered in the context of the city aquatic network, option 2 may enable the retirement of Otumoetai Pool, removing the maintenance and upgrade costs of a pool nearing the end of its useful life.

Legal Implications / Risks

30.     The design team have analysed the project risks in the attached document.

31.     Key risks relate to the early stage of the development, the poor ground conditions, funding and geothermal capacity.

32.     The project team has assessed these risks and incorporated them into the design programme and cost projections.

33.     Preconstruction investigations, including geotechnical report and geothermal bores, will provide greater insight into risks and will be reported back to Council alongside preliminary design.

Consultation / Engagement

34.     Mana whenua have been engaged as project design partners through a number of hui. The design team are developing a cultural narrative framework alongside the spatial planning team and mana whenua. The framework will develop a shared understanding of the cultural design drivers underpinning both projects based on the Tauranga Moana Design Principles.

35.     Initial engagement has been undertaken with reserve lease holders, user groups, and key aquatics and indoor sport stakeholders. A user group forum will be established with Bay Venues Limited leading the communication with these stakeholders. This forum will inform design development and management of the reserve and users during construction.

Significance

36.     The Local Government Act 2002 requires an assessment of the significance of matters, issues, proposals and decisions in this report against Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.  Council acknowledges that in some instances a matter, issue, proposal or decision may have a high degree of importance to individuals, groups, or agencies affected by the report.

37.     In making this assessment, consideration has been given to the likely impact, and likely consequences for:

(a)   the current and future social, economic, environmental, or cultural well-being of the district or region

(b)   any persons who are likely to be particularly affected by, or interested in, the decision.

(c)   the capacity of the local authority to perform its role, and the financial and other costs of doing so.

38.     In accordance with the considerations above, criteria and thresholds in the policy, it is considered that the decision is of medium significance.

Next Steps

39.     The attached document contains a development programme summary.

40.     The project team will progress to preliminary design and consenting for the preferred option. This is expected to shift to developed design in mid-2024.

41.     Procurement of enabling, demolition and pre-purchase works will be progressed.

42.     The second stage of approval will involve preliminary design and findings from preconstruction works reported back to Council. This will provide greater certainty regarding project risks.

 

Attachments

1.       Memorial Park Recreation Hub & Spatial Plan - A15349179  

 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 




















































 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

11.14     Approval of Memorial Park Site Development Plan

File Number:           A15338615

Author:                    Alison Law, Manager: Spaces & Places

Amanda Davies, Manager: Spaces and Places Project Outcomes

Authoriser:              Barbara Dempsey, General Manager: Community Services

 

Purpose of the Report

1.      To present the Memorial Park Spatial Plan and implementation as part of the Memorial Park Aquatic Centre Programme.

 

Recommendations

That the Council:

(a)     Receives the report "Approval of Memorial Park Site Development Plan";

(b)     Endorses the long-term spatial plan for Memorial Park; and

(c)     Approves upgrades to Memorial Park at a cost of $6 million, in line with the spatial plan.

 

 

Executive Summary

2.       The redevelopment of the Queen Elizabeth Youth Centre and the Memorial Park Pool, together with the need to renew the playground at Memorial Park, provided an opportunity to develop a long-term Spatial Plan (the Spatial Plan) for the whole park that will deliver improvements to the reserve in a coordinated and staged manner.

3.       This report recommends Council endorses the Spatial Plan (Attachment 1) and approves upgrades to Memorial Park in line with the spatial plan and the Memorial Park Aquatic Centre development, at a cost of $6 million (Attachment 2).

Background

Memorial Park Spatial Plan

4.       The Tauranga Reserves Management Plan (TRMP) categorises Memorial Park as a high profile reserve that provides for a range of activities, in particular opportunities for both formal and informal play, social gathering, and access to water. However, the TRMP notes that the park’s “visual quality does not truly reflect the status of the park”. The development of a Spatial Plan is one of the management statements contained in the TRMP.

5.       Memorial Park is classified as a recreation reserve under the Reserves Act 1977 and as noted above is categorised as a high profile reserve in the TRMP. The TRMP describes Memorial Park as a “key large recreational open space for Tauranga residents and visitors”.

6.       Implementation of the Spatial Plan addresses many of the management statements for the park contained in the TRMP. In particular, the Spatial Plan seeks to improve connectivity through the park, limit further car parking on Jordan Field, and “reinforce the park’s historic purpose as a community focused gathering place”.

7.       The Play, Active Recreation and Sport Action and Investment Plan (Play AIP) identifies Memorial Park as a destination play space that people would travel to and stay for an extended period. The Play AIP includes an action to invest in a plan that considers how the park interfaces with the Memorial Park Aquatic Centre (Aquatic Centre) and includes opportunities for play beyond just the redevelopment of the playground.

8.       The large open fields and the park’s proximity to the water make it highly valued by residents and whānau for informal social gathering. The Spatial Plan preserves the open space for large gatherings and provides associated infrastructure such as car parking, barbecues, toilets and seating.

9.       The Spatial Plan provides for a truly high-profile reserve including; improved open space areas and associated infrastructure; improved options for youth and play; movement via shared paths through the park; improved access to the water; renewal of the fountain including pathways and gardens surrounding the fountain and upgrades to the model railway area through increased planting and pathways. It is recommended that Council endorse this option as the long-term plan for the park.

10.     The implementation of the Spatial Plan over time will ensure that improvements to the park are befitting of its high profile status and provide for a unique play experience.

11.     Spaces and Places officers have worked alongside the project team delivering the concept design for the Aquatic Centre. The Spatial Plan provides for the Aquatic Centre to be a key element of Memorial Park and enables quality outcomes to be achieved across the whole park over the long term.

Implementation

12.     The proposed upgrades to Memorial Park at a cost of $6m, alongside the Aquatic centre development, includes:

·    Network of new shared path connections, including points of entry with Devonport Road and Eleventh Avenue

·    An upgrade of the existing play area, including a wetland play zone, new nature play trail and a new swing area

·    Improvements to open space areas, including lawn spaces, seating, picnic areas and all weather path access

·    New youth play zone including initial establishment of features for skate users

·    Centralised carparking with planting

·    New tree and amenity planting areas

13.     Early concepts for the unique play experience at Memorial Park suggest additional natural play areas that acknowledge the area’s previous ecological function and coastal environment. The intention is this play experience is complementary to the play experience on the waterfront.

14.     Youth play will be catered for. This is consistent with the aim of the Play AIP to increase opportunities for rangatahi to engage in play to address the low number of Bay of Plenty rangatahi engaging in recommended amount of physical activity. (Community feedback is also supportive of increasing play options for older children).

Financial Considerations

15.     The proposed project cost of $6 million was included through the draft budget for the wider Memorial Park programme included in the draft Long-term Plan 2024-34.

Legal Implications / Risks

16.     The renewal of the current playground is required as it is at the end of its useful life. There is a potential safety risk if not renewed promptly.

17.     The Spatial Plan assumes the renewal of leases for Tauranga Model Marine and Engineering (the model railway) and the mini golf facility. The renewal of these leases is subject to further negotiation and agreement with the lessees. As both leases are foreseen in the TRMP, there is no requirement for further public consultation on the lease renewal. There are no other legal implications arising from the recommended options.

Consultation / Engagement

18.     The redevelopment of Memorial Park has been considered and consulted on through several statutory processes including the aforementioned TRMP and AIPs. Options for the development of the park and the Spatial Plan have been considered through the wider Memorial Park project. This has included hui with mana whenua and representatives of key stakeholders.

19.     In particular, mana whenua have been involved in the development of specific cultural design drivers for Memorial Park. These include recognition of the area’s historic use as a place to gather and provide safe anchorage. These design drivers will be further refined and incorporated into the wider Memorial Park programme as the design and development progresses.

20.     Te Rangapū Mana Whenua o Tauranga Moana have previously noted the role of Memorial Park in providing a range of free activities and being large enough for whānau to host gatherings.

21.     Informal public feedback has been supportive of retaining the mini golf and model railway.

Significance

22.     The Local Government Act 2002 requires an assessment of the significance of matters, issues, proposals and decisions I n this report against Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.  Council acknowledges that in some instances a matter, issue, proposal or decision may have a high degree of importance to individuals, groups, or agencies affected by the report.

23.     In making this assessment, consideration has been given to the likely impact, and likely consequences for:

(a)   the current and future social, economic, environmental, or cultural well-being of the district or region

(b)   any persons who are likely to be particularly affected by, or interested in, the decision.

(c)   the capacity of the local authority to perform its role, and the financial and other costs of doing so.

24.     In accordance with the considerations above, criteria and thresholds in the policy, it is considered that the decision is of medium significance.

ENGAGEMENT

25.     Taking into consideration the above assessment that the decision is of medium significance, officers are of the opinion that no further engagement is required prior to Council making a decision.

26.     As we move through to detailed design and implementation we will continue to engage with mana whenua and representatives of key stakeholder groups.

Next Steps

27.     Subject to approval at this meeting, staff will progress the development and implementation. The construction timeline is dependent on the Aquatic Centre development.

Attachments

1.       Attachment 1 Memorial Park Spatial Plan - A15369439

2.       Attachment 2 Memorial Park Implementation - A15363507  

 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 













Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 


 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

12        Discussion of late items


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

13        Public excluded session

Resolution to exclude the public

Recommendations

That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting.

The general subject matter of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48 of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:

General subject of each matter to be considered

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter

Ground(s) under section 48 for the passing of this resolution

13.1 - Strategic Property Purchase for Memorial Park Recreation Hub Project

s7(2)(b)(ii) - The withholding of the information is necessary to protect information where the making available of the information would be likely unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied or who is the subject of the information

s7(2)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable Council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

s48(1)(a) - the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding would exist under section 6 or section 7

13.2 - Public Excluded Minutes of the Council meeting held on 27 November 2023

s7(2)(a) - The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of deceased natural persons

s7(2)(b)(ii) - The withholding of the information is necessary to protect information where the making available of the information would be likely unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied or who is the subject of the information

s7(2)(c)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary to protect information which is subject to an obligation of confidence or which any person has been or could be compelled to provide under the authority of any enactment, where the making available of the information would be likely to prejudice the supply of similar information, or information from the same source, and it is in the public interest that such information should continue to be supplied

s7(2)(h) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable Council to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities

s7(2)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable Council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

s48(1)(a) - the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding would exist under section 6 or section 7

13.3 - Indoor Court Provision - Concept Design & Cost Estimate and Exemption to Open Competition

s7(2)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable Council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

s48(1)(a) - the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding would exist under section 6 or section 7

13.4 - Memorial Park Aquatic Centre - Procurement Strategy

s7(2)(b)(ii) - The withholding of the information is necessary to protect information where the making available of the information would be likely unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied or who is the subject of the information

s7(2)(g) - The withholding of the information is necessary to maintain legal professional privilege

s7(2)(h) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable Council to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities

s7(2)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable Council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

s48(1)(a) - the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding would exist under section 6 or section 7

13.5 - Tauranga Art Gallery land purchase and capital project update

s7(2)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable Council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

s48(1)(a) - the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding would exist under section 6 or section 7

13.6 - Progression of Procurement for Cameron Road Stage 2

s7(2)(b)(ii) - The withholding of the information is necessary to protect information where the making available of the information would be likely unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied or who is the subject of the information

s48(1)(a) - the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding would exist under section 6 or section 7

13.7 - Transport Major Projects Governance and Oversight Arrangements

s7(2)(a) - The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons, including that of deceased natural persons

s7(2)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable Council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

s48(1)(a) - the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding would exist under section 6 or section 7

13.8 - Tauriko West: Strategic Considerations for Tauriko West Enabling Works Procurement

s7(2)(g) - The withholding of the information is necessary to maintain legal professional privilege

s7(2)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable Council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

s48(1)(a) - the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding would exist under section 6 or section 7

13.9 - Te Tumu Urban Growth Area

s7(2)(b)(ii) - The withholding of the information is necessary to protect information where the making available of the information would be likely unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied or who is the subject of the information

s7(2)(g) - The withholding of the information is necessary to maintain legal professional privilege

s7(2)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable Council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

s48(1)(a) - the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding would exist under section 6 or section 7

13.10 - Sale of Smiths Farm - Selection of Preferred Purchaser/Developer

s7(2)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable Council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

s48(1)(a) - the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding would exist under section 6 or section 7

13.11 - Exemption from Open Competition - New Inlet Works Mechanical Plant Procurement

s7(2)(h) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable Council to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities

s48(1)(a) - the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding would exist under section 6 or section 7

13.12 - Exemption to Open Competition - Prefabricated Public Convenience Block

s7(2)(h) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable Council to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities

s7(2)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable Council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

s7(2)(j) - The withholding of the information is necessary to prevent the disclosure or use of official information for improper gain or improper advantage

s48(1)(a) - the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding would exist under section 6 or section 7

13.13 - Direct Appointment under Exemption - Biofilter Replacement

s7(2)(h) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable Council to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities

s48(1)(a) - the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding would exist under section 6 or section 7

13.14 - Waterfront Projects Funding - Request for Budget Adjustments

s7(2)(h) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable Council to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities

s48(1)(a) - the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding would exist under section 6 or section 7

13.15 - Te Manawataki o Te Papa Infrastructure Funding and Financing Levy

s7(2)(h) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable Council to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities

s7(2)(i) - The withholding of the information is necessary to enable Council to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)

s48(1)(a) - the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding would exist under section 6 or section 7

 

 

 

 

 

 


Ordinary Council meeting Agenda

11 December 2023

 

14        Closing karakia



[1] Council direction in preparing the draft LTP was to exclude construction costs associated with the Kaituna Overflow.  However the majority of these constructions costs were included in the LTP period.  An internal submission has been made on the basis that Commissioners may want to push these budgets out as per original direction. 

[2] The council resolutions made under the Traffic and Parking Bylaw are available in an attachment to the bylaw which can be viewed on the council website at https://www.tauranga.govt.nz/Portals/0/data/council/bylaws/files/traffic-parking-attachments.pdf.

[3] https://www.tauranga.govt.nz/Portals/0/data/council/plans/reserve_management/files/tga_rmp/final_tauranga_rmp_reserve_specific_info.pdf.

[4] Indicative cost column also identifies funding status within the working draft 2024-2034 Long-term Plan, as at July 2023. Any change in funding status will be identified in this table once the LTP is adopted in April 2024.